Jump to content

ALL: Pivotal Years for Soaps


Recommended Posts

  • Members

That is easy - Gloria Monty at General Hospital. It changed the whole face of daytime as it was known at the time. She created a youth craze that was different, and people flocked to it.

The collapse for both NBC and CBS came because instead of trying to do something different they tried to be just like GH, and it didn't work.

All the other soaps except for Y&R hurt themselves severely. Days got some popularity but they never rose back to even the high point in the ratings that they had in the 70's. Only Y&R sought to be different and they are the ones that rose to the top.

Even GH's formula got old even for them, and Y&R rose over them because GH's newness and uniqueness wore off because suddenly every show was just like them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

1989. GENERATIONS debuts on NBC, half the cast is comprised of African-American actors. Within a year, most of the other shows started featuring more black characters, in particular The Young And The Restless who was the shows' direct timeslot competitor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Y&R was the first soap broadcast in color? I really don’t think that’s true. I believe the NBC soaps were the first in the mid-‘60s. OLTL and particularly AMC were the first soaps that drew young viewers on a large scale. Y&R did, however, set the standard for production values on Daytime TV. They had the best lighting and sets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In 1980 it was a combination of the following factors:

1.Days of Our Lives, that year, was apparently really bad. As bad as Langan, Higley and Reilly's second tenure were, what happened on Days in 1980 was equally damaging to the show. A number of longtime performers were let go and very few (if any) of the new characters created had any staying power at all.

2.The creation of AW spin-off Texas, which starred Beverlee McKinsey. McKinsey's move from AW to Texas caused AW's ratings to drop. Contrary to popular belief, AW's switch to 90 minutes in 1979 didn't cause the big ratings collapse- since AW's ratings were steady declining anyway, but was still NBC's highest-rated soap which it remained for most of the 90-minute run. After then, AW lost its position as NBC's highest-rated soap and never regained that.

3.The Doctors was moved into a new timeslot, effectively sealing its fate.

4.The fact that Days was in a bad state caused its ratings to drop first, and it soon affected the other NBC soaps. If you compare the 1979-80 and 1980-81 seasonal ratings (which can be viewed on this forum) you'll notice the big drop. However, both Days and AW made something of a miraculous recovery by 1984, even if nowhere near the levels they attained before 1980.

5.It also goes to show how the ratings and quality of one soap, can easily affect the ratings of all others around it. The success of AMC and GH in the late 70s had a knock-on effect on OLTL and Ryan's Hope, whilst B&B must be extremely grateful for being positioned between Y&R and ATWT. Until the early 90s, AW's ratings were easily affected by those of Days because of scheduling- and when Days' ratings surged suring 1983-84, it benefitted AW. When Days were in retreat by the early 90s, it also pulled AW's numbers down with it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Y&R was not the first soap broadcast in colour, it's not even the first soap to debut in colour. It's also not the first to not use organ music, or debut without organ music. Days didn't feature organ when it premiered, and as memory serves - was the first soap to debut in colour (still not the first to broadcast in colour - dont remember who that was). Dark Shadows also did not feature organ music, it had a wonderful and creepy score.

Y&R's debut was nothing special or dateworthy. It was just another soap to come along that happened to be great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How about Y&R was the first, and only soap, to be broadcast in High Definition TV.

IA that Y&R's debut was pivotal because of its vast production values compared to other soaps. Not to mention that the main focus was the actors, and the background always came secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

soaps prior to Y&R had their actors act infront of curtains, rather than build sets. That's something true of all soaps, none have really had a budget where they can go "look at my sets, arent they great!".

Plus, we know Y&R has always had lavish sets, and would always start scenes and episodes focused in on a piece of the set. Plus, I believe Y&R was the soap that used to have fresh flowers delivered each day that cost a significant amount of $$ before switching to fakes like the others use. Ether them or ATWT. So saying their background is secondary is untrue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

but again ... every soap focues on the acting rather than their background sets. Pointing lighting at certain things is not grounds for being a landmark. It's just a style. Just like other shows illuminate their entire sets and close the camera in on the actors faces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy