Jump to content

2006 Election Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

This guy on CNN is really making it pretty convincing that this recount is kinda dumb.

2000 recount (difference of 530 some votes) - FLORIDA (presidency)

2005 recount (difference of 300 some votes) - VIRGINIA (attorney general)

In both of these recounds, the difference in votes were UNDER 1,000 votes and ended up favouring the winning party GOING INTO the recount.

This year, the difference is over 11,000 votes....TO ME it is ABSOLUTELY impossible that the republican is going make up over 11,000 votes to be declared the winner...NOT IN THIS LIFETIME!

Democrats win Virginia and barring a late upset in Montana, they will win the majority of the Senate!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 159
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Its Montana, there really isn't any major cities :)

It traditionally is a red state, so the fact that the Democrats are winning here is monumental, especially considering the Republican candidate has been sent to the Senate for the last 15 years I think.

ANOTHER UPDATE:

Democrats @ 50% - 147,524

Republicans @ 47% - 140,097

Liberals @ 2% - 7,338

73% precincts IN!

What they are saying is that most of the western precincts in Montana are in and it is the eastern precincts that are coming in now and are still to come in. Traditionally these have been more republican...where as the western precincts have usually gone republican but with more democrat support. (hope that makes sense).

Its AMAZING to me that this race is coming down to MONTANA of all states. I mean they will have under 400,000 votes when all is said and done....just CRAZY!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here is a breakdown of MONTANA (their major cities populations): I am amazed this state is going BLUE at this moment...their demographics just SCREAM republican to me!

Billings = 90,000

Helena = 67,000

Great Falls = 57,000

Missoula = 57,000

Butte = 34,000

Bozeman = 28,000

Those are the biggest cities in Montana, so we are looking a state that doesn't even have 1 million people!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm sorry, but this just cracked me up....

Chris Matthews is reviewing the races which have already been caused, and it got to Missouri....

he talked about McCaskill and how both she and Talent ran good campaigns.

He mentioned that Talent really didn't do anything wrong in his campaign except be a Republican. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You knwo what is a slight shame? is that there are good, decent Republicans who lost their seats just because they were members of that party. Bush, Rove and that admin. have alot of explaing to do in the next days ahead, to explain how this whole thing happened.

I heard that crap. He's such a tool. Did you see how Joe Scarborough got pissed at him earlier this evening for agreeing with Howard Dean that Joe was not fair and down the middle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I liked when Felicia was over the top and was more Felicia the writer than Felicia the mother figure. Personal taste as always. For me, Felicia was AW to me. She was one of the few constants on a show that was constantly changing.  RIP Denise Alexander. I always liked her on the show despite her storyline never reaching its full potential. The sad thing is I would watch that storyline in a second over so much of what happened on AW from 1986 onwards. Strangely, youtube recommended a AW episode to me last night that involved Mary comforting Scott about Dawn. I really do wish they had found a way to make those two characters work long term.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Yes, I like him too. He is a good actor, and I agree with your comments about his personality. I also want to add, I think that he comes across as realistic and IMO sane. Yeah, he's done some bad things, but he seems pretty in control for the most part and not the least bit crazy. I appreciate that type of behavior in someone who can behave like a villain. And I continue to buy that he really does love his daughters. Unlike Leslie who seems to only use and mistreat Eva, I have seen Bill soften when it comes to his daughters. And I do believe he would do what he felt he had to do to protect them. His love for his children, helps make him more layered as a character. I really enjoyed his scenes with Dani today. I enjoyed the show today. I thought that the scenes with Nicole being comforted by both her parents including them switching out to comfort her were sweet and cute. I particularly enjoyed her scenes with Vernon. I love her relationship with her parents. I also liked Tomas/Eva scenes. He genuinely seems to care about her, and I am interested in seeing how things will play out between them and him and Kat.
    • Dani really got on my nerves. Her own life is a total disaster, yet she interferes with everyone else's. What could she possibly say to Ted that will change anything? That will help anyone? And as you said, while she bashes Bill, she wants him back -- all the while knowing who he is and who he's been for years. None of these scenes are pushing me to appreciate Dani. -- OTOH, Bill got some very good shots in at Dani. He won that face-off. -- June is just a ball of cliches and stereotypes to this point. I hope this goes somewhere. -- Martin flies off the handle much too easily, but I did appreciate that he grew calm and subdued, and even sad, with Ted. -- I'm glad Tomas is pretty, because damn, that acting. -- I'm glad Derek looks so good in tight jeans, because damn, that acting. -- LMAO at Leslie gaining entrance to Nicole's house because Nicole wanted the front door ajar so Door Dash could leave her takeout.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • No, we would really do it.  Those pix were so famous! In early May 1970 Susan introduced Doug Williams to Julie. Her intent was evil. But, it backfired on her. Doug & Julie fell in love. Everyone knows the rest of this story.
    • Doesn't matter if its off topic. No need to point it out. Things will get back on topic soon enough. They always do . . . And I do love the off topic photos from the Bill Bell era!  So thanks.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

          Thank you. I didn't realize there was confusion. You cleared it up.  It is more than crazy that this whole conversation is off-topic.
    • Sure!  And we promise, Mr Corday -- we will ridicule those wonderful old episodes daily on social media.   NOT!   
    • "To give her child a name" just means to make the child legitimate and be able to take the father's surname.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy