Jump to content

DAYS: Gloved Hand Speculation


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Making John the real Roman after 15 years would be so pointless and would conflict with so much history from the 90s. Sure, there are fans that want to see Drake as Roman. There also fans that want to see JER back as head writer. It just shouldn't happen, LOL. Keep John Black as Forrest Alamain and move on. Like you said, Phoenix when the topic of Tony was around, you shouldn't go back and re-write allready re-written history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well, it really wouldn't be rewriting history in regards to John. If you had to make Claire Philip's, yes but other then that it would be a life altering twist. Nothing would be rewritten. Like others said, if it is done fine but it isn't going to be so no big deal. I would like to dip more into John's past though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, like Mitch, that has been a bone stuck in my craw for 15 years. That was beyond a doubt the dumbest story twist in Days up to that point. How in the hell can you brainwash someoneinto THINKING he was someone else? Mitch, you have a brother-in-amrs on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Somewhere on Day's Cafe is mention that Hogan will bring out John's true paternity or close to that I don't remember word for word. If that is accurate at all, I'm thinking there is a lot of John's unknown past that will be revealed in months to come. I do hope he is NOT an Alamaine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mistake or no mistake, that storyline has given one of the most popular male characters in Daytime history. John is John Black. I could never see him being Roman. They're too different now. Back in the mid-90s, yes the reversal could've happened. Now, it's too late and would just be a mistake.

John's past should be established though. The best bet would just to solidify him as Forrest Alamain. That's your best bet, Hogie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And in your opinion, that's fine. In mine, I want John as Roman Brady. They have tried two different backgrounds for him, and it's working so well they never touch on either of them. Also back in the 90s, Days was stuck with one hackneed writer after another,who couldn't write a scene for Looney Tunes much less DOOL. With as many people who love Josh Talyor but don't like him as Roman, if HS decides to go that route, I'll do a happy dance,and he'll have one viewer who'll love him from here on out.

And that's the way it is. My opinion. Have fun everyone. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While there are many who would love see John as Roman, or would have loved to have Alex turn out to be Roman, the fact of the matter is, the audience that DAYS wants to capture with the quality it is now churning out would likely turn it off at the thought of being fooled like that for that long. It's not everyday, and that's what most people want out of these shows now, to an extent. I say this as someone who did a switcharoo in my BLOG and never regretted it more, but the story was written, so I did it, instead of just "RECASTING". Of course, with the return of the DiMeras, one could say the return the everyday is nowhere near happening, but I digress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

John should under NO circumstances be Roman. His past has been messed with for so many years, to rewrite everything others have done would be stupid. The last thing DAYS needs is another rewrite, MMT style. Keep him as Forrest Alamain, heck, make him Daphne DiMera's son...but him being Roman is dead, let it stay dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But isn't he Daphne's son already?

And, over the years they have made him so many different people, Forrest Alamain, Roman, Romulus, Father John, Stefano's henchman, etc. I just need closure on who he actually is, and I would LOVE Josh's Roman to be Chris Kostichek.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That is the major reason why I want him as Roman. I would provide closure. He could be Roman with all the elements of being John. Nothing would change accept his family. The fans wouls not tune out over this. This is not anothe dead is alive spoof. The fans love Drake and would be happy with this as many are sick of the multiple identities plot with him. I like that myself but I can see why others wouldn't.

It's a moot point anyway because I don't see this happening but, if it did, it would not kill the ratings. In fact, the drama that ensued would boost them. Shelle does nothing for the ratings so they can be sacrificed despite me liking them together. I don't see this as a slap in the face to fans, especially since many would not mind seeing it.

Oh well. If it happens, fine. If not, fine too. I don't see it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even though I want him as Roman, there is a problem if they did this on the real show:

Other Headwriters. This has been a major problem with who John is over the years, one headwriter wants him as Forrest, one wants him as Daphne's son, one wants him as Roman. If Hogan did it, it would be nice, but if a new HW ever cae around and Hogan was ousted, that HW could just cahnge John's history all over again, just like Langon did. Langon made him Daphne's son all of a sudden.

On blogs we KNOW it won't change because we will always be the HW, but on the real show, other HWs will always be a problem with everything.

Anyways, I can see Willow being one of EJ's employees now.... because she all of a sudden popped out of nowhere, hmmmmm.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That is a great point, which is why if it by some mirical does happen, he has to become whoever he is and it needs to stay that way. I also think fans would not leave in droves. With all the stuff that is happening on ABCD, where their shows are near the bottom, I really find it very hard to believe that changing one character's identity that should have never been changed in the first will make ratings tank. As long as both Drake and Jso stay on the show, I'm all for it. If others are not, I see where they are coming from, and, if they choose to stop watching because of it, they will be missed. But, I would rather watch a great story that ended like that, and with all the dramatic material still to be told, then seeing some of the crap we have seen for the last few years. Hell, HS and the writing staff are just now starting to end stories that should have never started in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree that the dramatic quality would be great, Roman, and far greater than any of the *be nice* unacceptable quality we've been dealt over the past 10 or so years, however, I think I'm one of the few fans that would liek to see things settle back into the everyday drama. Not the BORING crap, but the everyday nontheless- more grounded in family and friendship and less focused on the extreme. But, that's just me! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When I mentioned Roman as one of EJ's henchman, I wasn't speculating whether John was really Roman. I would prefer that John remain an Alamaine, so that John can maintain his fortune and so that we can have an opening for Vivian coming back on the show. That would be so much fun!!! I loved her!!

I was just thinking that the Roman that Stefano wheeled into Salem what 10 years or so ago was never THE Roman of the 80s/early 90s. That Roman died valiantly in the service of the ISA in the mid-90s. I believe that JER set it up back in the mid-90s that Roman died before Stefano/Kristen brought back this particular Roman.

In all candor, I don't think that Days needs Roman and if they decided to kill him off once and for all, I really wouldn't mind!! If Hogie wanted to go with a mystery, he could have Bo/John/Steve look for the identity of the real Roman's killer and work on whatever case the real Roman was investigating at the time...

Sorry, Roman. I know how much you like Roman but he seems like wasted space to me (even though Hogie is writing him better now). I just think that Roman's place in Salem has come and gone....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Keith, we do agree on that. The wild, stupid stories that have been told for the past ten years need to end. I think all I'm saying is that this is one of the very few plot twists that still just sticks in my craw, and if he can be given back his identity, once and for all, we can get back to telling real, humanistic stories, and stop with all the tomfoolery that had made Days the laughing stock of the soap world (And that boggles the mind),

I feel you Keith, and do agree on the drama. I do feel that my the slight chance it does happen, that will be the last story of its kind on Days for quite some time. :)

Oh, I see what you are saying too. Josh's Roman has been written so badly, that he doesn't even bear any resemblance to the heroic Roman of the 1980s, with both Wayne and Drake playing the role. Josh has come into his own better lately, and that is doing wonders for the character, but I just can't help saying "Why is Marlena talking to Chris?" Every time I see him on-screen. :lol: I just never could accept him as Roman Brady, who I do feel is a very vital character on the Days canvas. But, I do see your point. :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know the fashions have gotten mixed reviews but I actually like what the new costume designer is putting the cast in. It feels more modern and the more tacky pieces I feel make sense for rich people. They're buying for the brand and the price and we often see celebs in things like this. Especially for a character like Nikki, I feel the more over the top (and tacky), the more realistic it is.
    • Well, her staff pointing out the movie connection never seemed to stop Long from using those plots.  She was right about Vanessa--she needed a man who loved her, which she'd never really had up to then. But as others have pointed out, Long borrowed heavily from Taming of the Shrew to get it done. (which while I kinda disputed that, I get more now, having watched Kiss Me Kate a few times since.)
    • "Holly had her share of the blame..." NO, she did NOT. WOW. That's what you get for trying to be fair and giving these people the benefit of the doubt! The Rita rape episodes do not seem to be available. It sounds like Calhoun thought it was not dramatized, but it was. I saw it when it aired. Yes, it's close to 50 years ago, and memories aren't 100% reliable. I also know that Zaslow reportedly complained that it was written too much like a seduction and that's why the Dobsons portrayed Holly's rape differently. Maybe it started like a seduction and she rejected him and that's when it turned violent. I don't remember that part, if it exists. What I do remember is that Roger threw Rita so violently to the floor that she hit her head. They showed him coming at her from her point of view and he looked all fuzzy. It was an act of violence, not a seduction. Rita kept it a secret until it looked like Roger might be acquited, and then finally admitted it. She didn't make it up, it definitely was not a ploy.
    • I was actually referencing another scene between Roger and Alex, which I think is right after they marry.  But yeah---I'm not really impressed with Calhoun's reasoning. Or the "both recall it wasn't unprovoked" line. Wasn't Holly trying to leave him when he raped her? Oy vey.
    • I know we have discussed the location of Bay City in the Another World thread and the fact that originally Irna conceived of it as being the real Bay City MI, and it was later writers that treated it as a fictional Bay City [probably IL]. This article seems to suggest that that idea was well-established by 1981. I wonder when it started.
    • Desert Sun, 22 December 1983 Guiding Light’ writer looks for fresh ideas By TOM JORY Associated Press Writer NEW YORK (AP) - “Guiding Light” has been a daytime companion for millions since 1937, starting on radio and switching to TV after 15 years. Can anything new, really new, ever happen to the Bauers or the Reardons or any of the other folks in Springfield? “I get really upset,” says Pamela Long Hammer, principal writer for the CBS soap opera since March, “because I’ll come up with this neat scenario and someone will say, ‘That’s like “Strangers on a Train.’” “I think, ‘They keep stealing my material.’ “The way I figure it,” she says, “there are only so many stories in the world. It’s the characters who keep the show new and exciting. All of our stories come from them: I don’t come up with a plot, and then work a character into it.” Continuity is important. Someone out there surely knows all that’s happened, to everyone on the show, in 46 years. How about Miss Long Hammer? "Nope. I care about what our core families have been doing,” she says. “I’m always interested in what happened to Bert Bauer (played since 1950 by Charita Bauer) 20 years ago, but as far as going back and reading scripts, no. “Others on the show keep track,” she says. “I’ll suggest something, and be told, ‘You don’t remember, but five years ago, they had this terrible fight. They would never speak to one another now.”’ Miss Long Hammer, a former Miss Alabama who came to New York as an aspiring actress in 1980, began writing for daytime television while playing Ashley on NBC’s “Texas.” She eventually wrote herself out of the story. Her staff for “Guiding Light” includes nine writers, among them her husband, Charles Jay Hammer, whom she met while both worked on “Texas.” NBC dropped “Texas” after two seasons, and episodes from the serial currently are being rerun on the Turner Broadcasting System’s cable-TV SuperStation, WTBS. Gail Kobe, who was executive producer of “Texas,” now has the same job on “Guiding Light.” And Beverlee McKinsey, who played Iris Carrington in “Another World” on NBC, and later in "Texas,” will join the Light” cast of the CBS soap in February. Miss Long Hammer is reponsible for the long-term story, which can mean looking ahead 18 months or more. Staff writers deal with specifics, including the scripts for individual episodes. She says she draws on “imagination and instinct” for the “Guiding Light” story. Often, that involves inventing new characters. “‘I look at Vanessa (Maeve Kinkead), one of our leading ladies,” Miss Long Hammer says. "What could make the audience care more about her? “Then I think, ‘Why can’t she find a man she can love, who will also love her?’ Voila, here comes Billy Lewis (Jordan Clarke). “Another example,” she says, “is Alan Spaulding (Christopher Bernau). All of a sudden, he’s got a sister no one ever knew about. “They come complete,” says Miss Long Hammer of the serial’s characters, including the new ones. “We know who they are and where they came from long before the viewer gets all that information. That’s one of the most interesting things about daytime, the complexities of the characters.” The writers make a big effort to keep the show contemporary, and four of the leading players are in their late teens or early 20s Judi Evans, who plays Beth Raines, Kristi Tesreau (Mindy Lewis), Grant Aleksander (Philip Spaulding) and Michael O’Leary (Rick Bauer). “Guiding Light,” longevity notwithstanding, is a moderate success by that ultimate yardstick of the industry; ratings. The show is behind only “General Hospital,” “All My Children” and “One Life to Live,” all on ABC, and CBS’ “The Young and the Restless,” among soaps. And Miss Long Hammer says she’s convinced writing is the key to even greater achievement. “When I say I love the characters, it’s not a light thing,” she says. “I think what the audience senses is an enthusiasm and an energy among the people who do the show.”
    • I initially read this as Marilyn Manson and did a double take.  Thanks for the screen grabs. The outfits are horrible. Somehow Victoria's Miss Piggy dress is the best. Ashley looks like a French madam bent on revenge, and Abby looks like she hot glued lace scraps to her garbage bag.
    • LOL...I do have the vaguest of memories of Katherine driving her and Phillip Sr to his death. But I don't recall Katherine being as over-the-top as Reva. Surprisingly, I don't even think Brenda Dickinson's Jill was---although lord knows Brenda probably is a real-life Reva. I have read the recaps of earlier Roger, and it surprised me that he doesn't love Holly. He had an affair with Hillary (SHOCK, I tell you, SHOCK when I read that one) while married to her.  Thanks to the cast turnover, other than Jerry and Maureen Garrett, there wasn't anyone else he had worked with, that I can recall. It would've been interesting if Mart Hulswit had still been in the role of Ed, how much more they might've let Ed/Roger clash. I really do have a soft spot in my heart for Krista's Mindy.
    • San Bernardino Sun, 21 July 1981 Soap gets a new lease on life By TOM JORY Associated Press NEW YORK (AP) NBC's Texas premiered Aug. 4, 1980, in the toughest time slot in daytime TV opposite top rated General Hospital on ABC and CBS' enduring -Guiding Light As recently as the first of this year, " Texas appeared doomed, a victim of barely measurable ratings. All that has changed, and the show approaches its first anniversary with a new executive producer, a new team of writers, a new look and a new slant on life. Even the ratings have improved a bit, from 14 percent to l5 percent of the audience in the time period in November and December to 15 percent to 16 percent today. "We have Houston like Ryan's Hope has New York City," says Gail Kobe who took over Texas as executive supervising producer in March,"and we feel a real tie with that city. We've got to reflect in the show what's happening in that real town, and I think we're doing that." It was a significant step, taking Texas- its roots in the fictional Bay City of NBC's Another World -to a real-life setting. "I don't think it's got to be  the kind of place that people can't can't find on the map," says Ms. Kobe "I think the audience in daytime is more prepared for reality today." It meant giving the show a recognizable Houston backdrop, a more contemporary sound -country and western performers like Ray Price will appear periodically and a lighting system that would clearly represent the hot, bright Texas sunlight. . Texas faced difficult odds from the start, the competition and the inevitable comparison with CBS' prime-time superhit, Dallas, notwithstanding. There was the problem of introducing a multiplicity of characters, many of them imports from Another World, as well as a story line, in an hour-long format. "It was the first show to start at an hour," says Kobe, a former actress who had been supervising producer for Procter & Gamble Productions, which owns Texas and five other daytime shows. "It's very difficult to fill that much time with a large cast, and not leave the viewer confused. "With a daily show, you have to let the audience know who to root for," she says. ''And if you're trying to begin a story, too, no one's going to keep track." The changes began even before Kobe took the show from Paul Rauch, who had faced the seemingly impossible task of producing both Texas and Another World simultaneously. Beverlee McKinsey, whose generally unpleasant character, Iris, had come to Texas from Another World as a young ingenue, was given back her mean streak.  "She had become a sweet woman,"Kobe says, "and the audience was used to seeing her do terrible things. It just didn't work." In addition, she says, time was spent establishing the identities of the characters. Joyce and Bill Corrington, who had created the show with Rauch, were replaced as head writers in February by Dorothy Purser and Samuel Ratcliffe.  
    • 1995 CBS was sold to Westinghouse and Les Moonves arrived at CBS. I pointed out 1995/96 Murder, She Wrote as sabotage in the Tank Jobs and Sabotage thread.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy