Jump to content

July 24-28, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

It may happen before that. Y&R, Days, GL, and Passions are the only shows not falling. ATWT is being a little more consistent now but they are still in the middle of the pack. I can see Days beating B&B before Hogan takes over the way things are going since I am thinking B&B will be in the 2's relatively soon. I also think GL may beat an ABC soap, hopefully GH but probably OLTL.

It should be an interesting few weeks of numbers to say the least. The summer has been bad for pretty much all the shows but the five I mentioned above so we may see some surprises coming up IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think EVERYONE reading this should watch GL and TELL EVERYONE to watch GL and get the buzz going ALL OVER for GL and just for like two weeks BOOST GL's ratings enough to beat OLTL or AMC, and then tune out again. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Is anyone here a Nielsen family or is anyone you know? I wish there was a system to measure what people are really watching versus a small sample size. It may statistically significant but I still don't buy it. With today's technology, they should be able to tell what everyone is watching without doing a sample like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ICAM Roger! If I were head of daytime I would be fighting for a new way to tally these ratings and wouldnt stop until something changed. Its pitiful with today's technology that there isnt a better ratings system in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Happy that Y&R and GL have stayed consistant. ATWT should be higher cause it's really good. I think P&G should see ABCD slump and go in for the kill.

For starters, GL bring back Edmund so we can start the next Winslow clan...... Olivia/Ava/Edmund would be great. Bringing back Sebastian and Holly would give Reva a break. Bring the real Spauldings back (including Amanda and Vicky), Soras Kevin & Jason Marler, Soras Zack, Jude, & Clairissa. Add Danny, Michelle, Ed, Marah, & Shayne to the mix and GL will have enough characters and core familes to rejuvinate Springfield once again.

I know they have a budget to follow, but they need to at least give them enough to revamp the show. P&G and CBS needs to at least do that. New HeadWriter would be on the top of my list though then work down from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GL at 2.2 consistently? What's to keep OL from joining them? They've been pushing the same stories and the same agenda for months and the show's been dropping. Why would people start watching now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is good news for DAYS. An increasing focused approach on more traditional storytelling, combined with the return of Stephen and Mary Beth has done wonders. Let's hope this keeps up when Hogan takes over.

ABCD is totally in the shitter now. Serves them right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One of the problems of ABC Daytime (in addition to subpar writing) is the promotion. A quick visit to the "General Hospital" site on ABC.com directs a user to get acquanted with the "teen scene" of the soap.

Those featured are Ben Hogestyn (Lucas), Julie Marie Berman (Lulu), Kirsten Storms (Maxie), Lindze Letherman (Georgia), Scott Clifton (Dillon) and Ignacio Serricchio (Diego). What's the problem with this web advertisement? These actors/characters are rarely ever featured. That is especially glaring since most soaps give their younger actors more face time during the summer months.

Sisters Maxie and Georgie rarely share any screen time, while Georgie and her ex-husband Dillon are seen together even more rarely. Lulu and Diego are also often MIA, while Lucas is lucky to been showcased once a month. It is ironic that ABC.com would advertise characters that are rarely ever utilized.

While these actors/characters may not deserve to be prominently featured, but they should be on screen if the network is going to promote them.

Personally, if a soap can afford to have numerous characters that can be absent for days, or in Lucas's case weeks, they don't serve a real purpose. With all the belt tightening occuring on soaps, perhaps moving these rarely used characters off the canvas is a more attractive alternative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As much as I personally want McTravesty's AMC ratings to tank, I can't but be happy that all of ABCD is suffering.

It makes one wonder. Since Fronsie's put so much time and effort into synergy between the shows, branding them as one uniform ABCD entity, including sharing similar/exact and simultaneous themes amongst his soaps in an effort to bring in the ratings to ABCD that if his plan goes awry it could pull ALL ABCD soaps down simultaneously in the ratings.

Could his synergistic gimmickry for ratings gold turn into a ratings black hole for all three shows? Sorry 'bout the mixed metaphors, there. We know the similar writing styles the over-arching themes in stories (for my show, I've called it the GHification of AMC which is outside of McT's own special brand of twisted sickness) are already a Fronsie staple for all 3 soaps which is another contributing factor, imo.

Tankety-tank-tank. *insert ABCD HW here* and Fronise...Got. To. Go!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm a perfect example of this...

I haven't been able to watch OLTL since May and the only parts I catch are the 2 min. after AMC that my tape catches....and every episode this summer has started with Rex and Adriana on the beach and a stalker....everything I catch from the show is a repeat of what I see everyday. It's gross. That show needs a major overhaul!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's been a campaign of Fronsie's since his arrival and the individual flavors of the shows have been diminished. I wouldn't go so far as saying they "have to share a common theme" but there are duplicated and copy cat themes (I think the Jonathan Lavery and Manny storyline were compared a lot). I think perhaps the darkness, the attitudes towards women (lots of violations flying around), a glaring lack of diversity, pushing criminals as heros, propping characters who've been annoited by the corporation at the expense of the overall show and cast, blah, blah, you've heard it all a thousand times before.

With Fronsie, the marketing drives the content, not the other way around. It's a short-sighted, short-term gain, long-term pain philosophy, imo because story and character MUST be the foundation of soaps. While I admire his work in trying to promote daytime and bring into the new milenneum how soaps are marketed and forward leaning in terms of alternative sources of revenue (SOAPnet, product placement, etc) he's going about all ass backwards.

I think he's astonishingly ignorant and retro about diversity issues. I know what he says about his focus group numbers but playing into people's ignorance and actively ignoring social responsiblity...bad idea for the good of the longterm brand, imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • These contract guarantees of 1 ep per month are ridiculous. How can you even have a story if your character apprars 4-5 times in a month? It's sad.
    • It's hard to tell with some actors appearing on average 4 times in a month whether they're recurring or just on a low guarantee contract. Someone recurring  like Beth Maitland can be used a lot for several months then disappear. So the monthly tallies aren't enough to go by.
    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy