Jump to content

July 24-28, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

It may happen before that. Y&R, Days, GL, and Passions are the only shows not falling. ATWT is being a little more consistent now but they are still in the middle of the pack. I can see Days beating B&B before Hogan takes over the way things are going since I am thinking B&B will be in the 2's relatively soon. I also think GL may beat an ABC soap, hopefully GH but probably OLTL.

It should be an interesting few weeks of numbers to say the least. The summer has been bad for pretty much all the shows but the five I mentioned above so we may see some surprises coming up IMO.

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

I think EVERYONE reading this should watch GL and TELL EVERYONE to watch GL and get the buzz going ALL OVER for GL and just for like two weeks BOOST GL's ratings enough to beat OLTL or AMC, and then tune out again. :lol:

  • Members
Posted

Is anyone here a Nielsen family or is anyone you know? I wish there was a system to measure what people are really watching versus a small sample size. It may statistically significant but I still don't buy it. With today's technology, they should be able to tell what everyone is watching without doing a sample like this.

  • Members
Posted

ICAM Roger! If I were head of daytime I would be fighting for a new way to tally these ratings and wouldnt stop until something changed. Its pitiful with today's technology that there isnt a better ratings system in place.

  • Members
Posted

Happy that Y&R and GL have stayed consistant. ATWT should be higher cause it's really good. I think P&G should see ABCD slump and go in for the kill.

For starters, GL bring back Edmund so we can start the next Winslow clan...... Olivia/Ava/Edmund would be great. Bringing back Sebastian and Holly would give Reva a break. Bring the real Spauldings back (including Amanda and Vicky), Soras Kevin & Jason Marler, Soras Zack, Jude, & Clairissa. Add Danny, Michelle, Ed, Marah, & Shayne to the mix and GL will have enough characters and core familes to rejuvinate Springfield once again.

I know they have a budget to follow, but they need to at least give them enough to revamp the show. P&G and CBS needs to at least do that. New HeadWriter would be on the top of my list though then work down from there.

  • Members
Posted

ITA, all the ABC soaps are going down the tubes, and OLTL looks like it'll be the first. A 2.3? Yikes.

I wish ATWT was higher, though I didn't think that week was so great. And good for Y&R.

  • Members
Posted

GL at 2.2 consistently? What's to keep OL from joining them? They've been pushing the same stories and the same agenda for months and the show's been dropping. Why would people start watching now?

  • Members
Posted

This is good news for DAYS. An increasing focused approach on more traditional storytelling, combined with the return of Stephen and Mary Beth has done wonders. Let's hope this keeps up when Hogan takes over.

ABCD is totally in the shitter now. Serves them right.

  • Members
Posted

One of the problems of ABC Daytime (in addition to subpar writing) is the promotion. A quick visit to the "General Hospital" site on ABC.com directs a user to get acquanted with the "teen scene" of the soap.

Those featured are Ben Hogestyn (Lucas), Julie Marie Berman (Lulu), Kirsten Storms (Maxie), Lindze Letherman (Georgia), Scott Clifton (Dillon) and Ignacio Serricchio (Diego). What's the problem with this web advertisement? These actors/characters are rarely ever featured. That is especially glaring since most soaps give their younger actors more face time during the summer months.

Sisters Maxie and Georgie rarely share any screen time, while Georgie and her ex-husband Dillon are seen together even more rarely. Lulu and Diego are also often MIA, while Lucas is lucky to been showcased once a month. It is ironic that ABC.com would advertise characters that are rarely ever utilized.

While these actors/characters may not deserve to be prominently featured, but they should be on screen if the network is going to promote them.

Personally, if a soap can afford to have numerous characters that can be absent for days, or in Lucas's case weeks, they don't serve a real purpose. With all the belt tightening occuring on soaps, perhaps moving these rarely used characters off the canvas is a more attractive alternative.

  • Members
Posted

Months? OLTL has had the same stories running for two years and still there is no end in sight. People can tune out for months and come back to find nothing has happened.

  • Members
Posted

As much as I personally want McTravesty's AMC ratings to tank, I can't but be happy that all of ABCD is suffering.

It makes one wonder. Since Fronsie's put so much time and effort into synergy between the shows, branding them as one uniform ABCD entity, including sharing similar/exact and simultaneous themes amongst his soaps in an effort to bring in the ratings to ABCD that if his plan goes awry it could pull ALL ABCD soaps down simultaneously in the ratings.

Could his synergistic gimmickry for ratings gold turn into a ratings black hole for all three shows? Sorry 'bout the mixed metaphors, there. We know the similar writing styles the over-arching themes in stories (for my show, I've called it the GHification of AMC which is outside of McT's own special brand of twisted sickness) are already a Fronsie staple for all 3 soaps which is another contributing factor, imo.

Tankety-tank-tank. *insert ABCD HW here* and Fronise...Got. To. Go!

  • Members
Posted

I'm a perfect example of this...

I haven't been able to watch OLTL since May and the only parts I catch are the 2 min. after AMC that my tape catches....and every episode this summer has started with Rex and Adriana on the beach and a stalker....everything I catch from the show is a repeat of what I see everyday. It's gross. That show needs a major overhaul!

  • Members
Posted

I think it's been a campaign of Fronsie's since his arrival and the individual flavors of the shows have been diminished. I wouldn't go so far as saying they "have to share a common theme" but there are duplicated and copy cat themes (I think the Jonathan Lavery and Manny storyline were compared a lot). I think perhaps the darkness, the attitudes towards women (lots of violations flying around), a glaring lack of diversity, pushing criminals as heros, propping characters who've been annoited by the corporation at the expense of the overall show and cast, blah, blah, you've heard it all a thousand times before.

With Fronsie, the marketing drives the content, not the other way around. It's a short-sighted, short-term gain, long-term pain philosophy, imo because story and character MUST be the foundation of soaps. While I admire his work in trying to promote daytime and bring into the new milenneum how soaps are marketed and forward leaning in terms of alternative sources of revenue (SOAPnet, product placement, etc) he's going about all ass backwards.

I think he's astonishingly ignorant and retro about diversity issues. I know what he says about his focus group numbers but playing into people's ignorance and actively ignoring social responsiblity...bad idea for the good of the longterm brand, imo.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

      I went back to see how teen Sami even figured out how to sell a baby in 1993, and the recap is unintentionally hilarious. The exposition is so blunt it feels like the writers drafted it between bites of lunch. Suddenly there’s a teen mom named Karen who sold her baby through a shady lawyer, and somehow Sami just… knows this man and pays him with hospital volunteer money. You can tell they were trying to make the whole thing “plausible” enough, but also knew the baby wouldn’t be gone long enough to justify a real subplot.  I know one thing, if Karen had confided in Jamie, Sami would've never met Steve Miller. Jamie knew that snitches get stitches. Not to be confused with the horrific Stephen Miller, who was 8 in 1993.
    • I can’t help but to get drawn in by Dani and Andre but it just angers me that it’s so obvious that they’re not endgame.
    • John and Marlena may have committed adultery, but they weren't going to be smug creeps about it. "Roman, how do you feel about the name Isabella Titania Brady?"
    • -- It's always amazing to me that these "terrible breakdowns" (by writers so bad they shall not be named) are saved by incredible script writers. Every time 

      Please register in order to view this content

      -- Kat is a "spoilt bitch" while Eva isn't??? -- Does Kat go too far with her mouth? Absolutely. But I get it. Eva has done some terrible things and continues to enable her criminal mother while Kat's family and boyfriend DEFEND her and show her love. -- Eva's complaints about Leslie are meaningless, because they're never backed up with anything. I'll take "spoilt bitch" any day before I take "criminal enabling hoe." -- It's nice that Martin accepts Eva, but the way he's handling it is eye-rolling. Eva gets hugs and smiles and full acceptance while Kat is trashed -- to Eva's face. -- Martin is STILL obsessing over the Kat conversation about sex that Samantha heard. Are you kidding me with this? And now Eva offers to speak to Kat. Yeah, very cute that the sister who screwed the other sister's boyfriend is the one with relationship advice. -- The food at Uptown looked pretty good today. Orphey Gene's food has yet to impress me, and I think it's clear that the country club chef is an alcoholic who cannot control his kitchen.
    • At this point, Marlena, John, and Roman all thought Roman was Belle's father. Sami had switched the initial blood tests. When it was time for another round of tests (because Belle was jaundiced), Sami panicked and kidnapped the baby.  Up until January 1994, Sami was the only one who knew that John was Belle's father. Next up were Stefano and Peter, once Stefano read Sami's diary (he figured it would reveal what was going on between John & Marlena). Stefano revealed the truth of Belle's parentage to Roman AFTER Marlena revealed her tryst with John (about two weeks later, to be exact). Marlena and John were the last ones to find out (during February sweeps, naturally). The John Black name was revived in September 1991.
    • The show has been getting better and better. Dani and Andre solidly "coupling" has been amazing. Genie Francis says soaps don't do couples anymore...maybe Dani/Andre can prove her wrong. To me they are the best couple on the show.  Eva vs Kat is always great. The show continues to find ways to keep it going and I'm all for it. Kat annoys me so bad. She is such a spoiled princess and acts it. I agree the comment about wishing Eva had been aborted was low. If that were the case, then why is she constantly getting in Eva's face? Why doesn't Kat just stay away and ignore her completely like she doesn't exist? I know. I know. It wouldn't be soaping.  This Hayley plot to kill Bill now taking a detour onto Izaiah has me curious. Does Hayley even know what she wants? I can't wait to see the fallout for Hayley and Randy....but not too soon.  I am tired of hearing about Winterfest already though. Can we get to it? lol
    • Great rundown of Long's second stint. Now you got me wondering...and again, thinking how real life impacted the direction of the show. We were talking about how practically the minute Long landed back on GL, she wrecked Ross and Vanessa and threw Alan and Reva together. Soon after, Alan started pursuing Vanessa again (because he was SO afraid of the "real" feelings he was having for Reva for the first time in his life, LOL). It's like she was determined to do an Alan/Vanessa/Somebody triangle at some point. She started one with Billy as the third side (well, actually, Alan was the third side) back in late 83/early 84 before Bernau exited GL the first time. So she had to drop it. But since Billy was gone this time, she seemed to decide, hey, I'll do it, only with Reva as the missing side of the triangle. Then Maeve left, messing that up! So I wonder, would she have had Alan and Vanessa marry? Maybe not, but I doubt Vanessa would have taken kindly to being overthrown for Reva. Could have been done in a really humiliating way, like after the invitations went out or even at the wedding. Maybe she would have helped Phillip with his plot to dethrone Alan. Lots of interesting possiblities.  I did like the way this story was handled. Chelsea was clearly more in love with Phillip than he was with her. Even "dead," no one could compete with Beth. So it was always doomed, but they showed how Phillip lost his way because he was obsessed with getting back at his dad. I also thought the relationship between Alan and Chelsea was a little...strange. He was very much in favor of their relationship, even though she came from an even lower background than Beth's. She also always fiercely defended Alan. Which has made me wonder if--ick--one of the many writing teams was thinking about putting them together romantically. (Of course, in my headcanon, where Alan has a youthful romance with the never seen Reardon sister, his fondness for Chelsea then makes perfect sense.) I always wondered why they never thought of putting Chelsea with Rick, especially after they butted heads over the death of her fiance. Seemed like a no-brainer.
    • Aubrey's Marina was great...but they wasted her...she could have been a new Nola (since she was living in the BH I would have had her find the N.R. + K.N. thing Nola carved in her bedroom...."I don't know who this girl was but she seems to be as unhappy as I am stuck here.") And have her set her cap for a good recast Shayne and take on the Old Bag Reva when she tries to interfere.."Oh please, I heard she was back in Oklahamo giving blow jobs behind the gas station, and she acts like she is Mother of the Year...God I hate her."  When they recast with that boring Kit girl and then...cutesy Mandy it was done. I love the idea of Billy and Van bonding over hell on wheels Peter. and kicking **** to the curb.Billy went to prison to protect him from Roger but that was never mentioned when Billy returned. Peter and Aubrey's Marina would raise Hell together..do a Nolaredux  in that he bangs her, she gets preggers, passes that off as Shayne's with Ole Bag Reva suspicious...I could see Marina ringing a bell to get the Ole Bag to bring her some ice cream...."But Grandma...oh you hate that I am sorry, okay, Grammy, you know I can't be stressed and oh, Shayne would be mad if I lost the baby..."ah what could have been.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Yeah, that's I mentioned the christening, when the truth comes out Reading October and November 1993, what is actually nuts is how much story they went through in a month. Because John's not even interested in Marlena at the time of Belle's birth.  He is rebound lusting for Kristen, who delivered Belle (funny mention in SOD about Marlena being unable to service at the Horton cabin on her "cellular" phone, I assume there was heightened vigilance to the exposition covering the tech of the time).   And, of course, since it was Kristen helping Marlena give birth during a stormy night, they both looked glossy, windswept, and gorgeous.    Justice for Jamie, I bet she's still holding Sami's secrets wherever she is.
    • You know what's crazy? Even though JFP ultimately has been a disaster at many soaps, and even though all the negatives about her are true, I'd still prefer her over Josh Griffith at Y&R. She can take over for him anytime, and I will applaud.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy