Jump to content

May 1-5, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Amen and well said! Couples can be torn apart or estranged from each other as long as the writing is solid, compelling, and realistic (in terms of how the couple is torn apart, whether or not the characters are behaving like themselves or dumbed down pod people). Unhappy couples don't equal unhappy viewers. It's the repetitive, lazy, plot-driven, contrived, predictable, rehashed garbage that turns viewers off and makes them no longer care what happens to their characters.

Of course, this can be applied to any show when this is happening, it just so happens that right now it is happening most noticably on DAYS.

The network refuses to admit that lightning didn't strike twice. Reilly's lost his creative juice. He's all dried up and needs to be put to pasture with the other cows with bloated egos.

Because the show has aired behind Y&R since its 1987 debut. B&B benefits from its Y&R lead-in while other soaps that are aired at 10/9am in the morning in key markets (Guiding Light!) earn pooey ratings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

There are several "Days" points that everyone can agree on...

*hitting or tying record low ratings for "Days" and "Passions" does not encourage TPTB at NBC to keep their soap line-up in business. Remember, that historically, NBC has never excelled in daytime - even when the beloved "Santa Barbara" was racking up Emmy nominations and wins. With Ken Corday and Sony entering negotiations with NBC on picking up the final two years of their four year renewal, ratings such as these put Corday and Sony at a disadvantage.

*just because TV Guide's Michael Logan mentioned the possible demise of NBC Daytime last fall and nothing came of it doesn't necessarily carry any weight. For instance, if NBC were to cancel "Days" next week, it would still be contractually obligated to air the series until 2007 - at least six months worth of episodes. Daytime moves at a glaciar pace compared to primetime, so just because a rumor doesn't become reality doesn't mean it truly is a rumor. Perhaps NBC decided last fall to wait until the end of the current TV season (later this month) to make a decision on its daytime future.

*all the ABC soaps garner higher ratings than "Days" does at the moment. I agree that it would make financial sense to let NBC drop "Days" and "Passions" without getting involved. However, ABC doesn't air a full complement of soaps like CBS does, so naturally ABC would be targeted as a potential home for the NBC castoff. Another (longshot) possibility is Fox, which currently allows its affiliates to program the daytime line-up. An "Days"/Fox pairing has been rumored as well, but Fox hasn't expressed any interest in starting a daytime line-up whether it be soap opera or not.

Lastly, sadly, if NBC does dump daytime, it appears likely that both NBC soaps will enter the TV history books instead of finding another life at another network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well with all the talk about DAys and Passions cancellations the fans of GL don't need to sit too comfortably either. If Days and Passions are cancelled GL will find itself at the bottom all alone. DAys is the only show lately that it even gets close too. Occassionally it gets a little closer to ATWT than the others. And this weeks ratings stunk really bad. They didn't even have a recovery day during the week like Days did. And I think they have set record lows recently and tied them as well.

Days and Passions cancellations only puts GL in more danger of being cancelled. And I honestly don't think that the networks will replace them with soaps either - so it is a very good possibility that we will be looking at 6 soaps sometime in the next 2 or 3 years.

I don't think P&G will stay in the business of soaps much longer. It has been said that ever since AW's cancellation they wanted out. I don't think they will keep ATWT too long after they get rid of GL. Most likely the will either try to sell ATWT to the network or a network or cancel it not long afterward.

Everyone can sit back and talk about Days and Passions and I know as well as anyone that cancellation is a possibility for both. But GL is not safe and the cancellations of both shows will only hurt it. And hurt the whole genre that we all are supposed to love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I may be mistaken, but I believe NBC announced the cancellation of "Another World" in Spring 1999 and ended its run in June of that year.

Also, many NBC soaps have aired their final episodes in December/January, among them...

Santa Barbara (1993)

Sunset Beach (1999)

Generations (1991)

Texas (1982)

Somerset (1976)

The Doctors (1982) [which ended the same day as "Texas"]

So, the time frame for the daytime season is really irrelevant when it comes to cancelling a series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course the time frame of the daytime season is irrelevant. I was just pointing out that the daytime season runs for a whole year, since you thought the network would wait until the end May to decide the fate of their lineup. I see no reason TPTB would wait until the end of primetime season to decide the fate of daytime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe it depends on the announcement of the cancellations. I have no idea why I remember - maybe because I was a HUGE Santa Barbara fan and was devastated when reading the news - but I remember reading that NBC cancelled SB as early as September '92 in...the soap section of Star Magazine! LOL! I even recall it said the last airing would be in January.

So if a soap season is September to September, it makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I disagree with your post. GL has been getting a 2.1 to 2.4 for the past couple of years and it hasn't been canceled yet. If they cancel Passions and GL is still getting the same ratings, it isn't going to effect them just because they are in last place. Shows get paid by their actual points not their rank. Now if their ratings drop any further then there's the risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree about fans willing to see their favorite couples broken up for awhile as long as the story is well-written. However, that is not what Days is about today which is why fans have given up throwing the sandwiches at the TV and are just changing the channel.

One of the best stories Days ever wrote for J&J had to do with Jennifer's rape and the aftermath. From the time they returned from Alamania (Nov) until early January they were still together but with a great deal of conflict. They split up with the famous rape slap and Jack even married Eve. Fans went along for the ride and it was a great story.

Yes, they ultimately reunited but they were apart for months and fans enjoyed the story. It was heart-felt, character driven and you never doubted for a moment who the rooting couples were.

This is the difference today. Couples are split up but for idiotic reasons - Marlena gets amnesia after being "dead" for almost a year and splits with John. Since John/Marlena fans never truly got a payoff, it was hard to get behind the Marlena/Alex story - and the "mind control" aspect was just annoying. Why JER didn't decide instead to focus on the John/Marlena/Roman baby angle instead is beyond me. It would have made a lot more character sense and generated more angst than the Alex story.

Jack after dying twice in the Stalker story returns to Salem - only to learn he is about to die yet again. Talk about story fatigue - I have begun to wonder if all poor Jack can do is die or prepare to die. So, he "dies" a third time and Jennifer takes up with Frankie. Does any J&J fan really want to see Jennifer doing the deed with Frankie in a back yard lawnchair when we have had precious little J&J romance over the past three years. I refuse to believe that the only choice for J&J is to either be written off or have Jack constantly dying. With a little effort, there could have been a good story. Jennifer's constant trauma could have caused her to have a mental breakdown, how about an ex-love of Jack's past shows up (now that would be original for Jack - apparently no one but Jenn is allowed to care/love him).

I won't even go into LUMI. To think that the fans waited 10 years for Lumi and now we are back at the beginning with Lucas/Carrie and Sami/Austin. It is mind-numbing.

I won't even go into how wrong Hope/the shirtless wonder sex was. I have no words. And Bollie has already been explored upteenth times. The fans are sick of it being explored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You basically proved the point. The ranking doesn't matter. If it did, Passions would have been gone regardless of it's ratings (demos or otherwise.) Someone has to be last and if the last place soap was always canceled, we would have soaps canceled every few months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know in the past that the lowest show has not always been immediately cancelled, but with no shows doing that good right now the cancellation of 2 shows or even one show makes it a whole lot easier for TPTB to cancel another one.

The example of Passions can not be used to exempt GL either. Passions has been saved I think for 2 reasons - the first being it's demos and it getting the ratings in the demos NBC wanted it too. It has also been saved by the mere fact that NBC is down to 2 shows. I think honestly that if NBC cancels one it will cancel the other and vice versa if one is saved the other will be saved. I don't think NBC wants a new show and they don't want one show. Those 2 things are the reasons NBC has stuck with Passions.

GL is not doing that well in most demos. It has not had any big ratings increases. P&G is not investing money in anymore new soaps which indicates the rumor they want out is true.

I think the biggest thing GL has going for it is the big upcoming anniversary. I don't think CBS or P&G will do anything until after that. I think the show could go even if Passions stays, but if Passions does go the decision will be even easier.

And we will get more talk shows in their place because TPTB say they are cheaper to produce.

GL and Passions are also the biggest at risk because they are the only shows that have not been consistently in that 5 way fight for 3rd place that has been going on for a year or longer now. Those shows are DAys, GH, AMC, ATWT, and OLTL. GL and Passions are consistently 8 and 9. If GL could get up in that fight it might be saved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

HERE WE HAVE LARGEST GAIN/FALL FOR THAT DAY OF SOAP EPISODES ALONG WITH THE MOST VIEWED DAY OF THE WEEK MARKED FOR EACH SOAP.

MONDAY, MAY 1

1. Y&R: Monday, 5/1: 4.1/5,269,000 (+229,000)

2. B&B: Monday, 5/1: 3.2/4,171,000 (+60,000)

3. GH: Monday, 5/1: 2.9/3,750,000 (+610,000) [LARGEST GAIN] [MOST VIEWED EPISODE]

4. AMC: Monday, 5/1: 2.8/3,488,000 (+302,000) [MOST VIEWED EPISODE]

5. OLTL: Monday, 5/1: 2.7/3,372,000 (+432,000) [MOST VIEWED EPISODE]

6. ATWT: Monday, 5/1: 2.4/3,205,000 (+116,000) [MOST VIEWED EPISODE]

7. DAYS: Monday, 5/1: 2.2/2,822,000 (-112,000)

8. GL: Monday, 5/1: 2.1/2,765,000 (+108,000)

9. PSNS: Monday, 5/1: 1.3/1,680,000 (-188,000) [LARGEST FALL]

TUESDAY, MAY 2

1.(1) Y&R: Tuesday, 5/2: 4.3/5,428,000 (+159,000) [LARGEST GAIN]

2.(2) B&B: Tuesday, 5/2: 3.2/4,126,000 (-45,000)

3.(3) GH: Tuesday, 5/2: 2.8/3,454,000 (-296,000)

4.(4) AMC: Tuesday, 5/2: 2.7/3,246,000 (-242,000)

5.(5) ATWT: Tuesday, 5/2: 2.5/3,172,000 (-33,000)

6.(6) OLTL: Tuesday, 5/2: 2.4/3,059,000 (-313,000) [LARGEST FALL]

7.(8) GL: Tuesday, 5/2: 2.2/2,795,000 (+30,000)

8.(7) DAYS: Tuesday, 5/2: 2.3/2,780,000 (-42,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Tuesday, 5/2: 1.4/1,809,000 (+129,000)

WEDNESDAY, MAY 3

1.(1) Y&R: Wednesday, 5/3: 4.1/5,238,000 (-190,000)

2.(2) B&B: Wednesday, 5/3: 3.1/3,918,000 (-208,000) [LARGEST FALL]

3.(3) GH: Wednesday, 5/3: 2.8/3,395,000 (-59,000)

4.(4) AMC: Wednesday, 5/3: 2.5/3,084,000 (-162,000)

4.(5) ATWT: Wednesday, 5/3: 2.5/3,084,000 (-88,000)

6.(6) OLTL: Wednesday, 5/3: 2.5/2,957,000 (-102,000)

7.(8) DAYS: Wednesday, 5/3: 2.2/2,881,000 (+101,000) [LARGEST GAIN]

8.(7) GL: Wednesday, 5/3: 2.2/2,832,000 (+37,000) [MOST VIEWED EPISODE]

9.(9) PSNS: Wednesday, 5/3: 1.3/1,803,000 (-6,000)

THURSDAY, MAY 4

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday, 5/4: 4.2/5,017,000 (-221,000) [LARGEST FALL]

2.(2) B&B: Thursday, 5/4: 3.2/3,844,000 (-74,000)

3.(3) GH: Thursday, 5/4: 2.9/3,579,000 (+184,000)

4.(4) AMC: Thursday, 5/4: 2.6/3,271,000 (+187,000) [LARGEST GAIN]

5.(4) ATWT: Thursday, 5/4: 2.6/3,154,000 (+70,000)

6.(6) OLTL: Thursday, 5/4: 2.5/3,092,000 (+135,000)

7.(7) DAYS: Thursday, 5/4: 2.2/2,860,000 (-21,000)

8.(8) GL: Thursday, 5/4: 2.2/2,732,000 (-100,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Thursday, 5/4: 1.3/1,642,000 (-161,000)

FRIDAY, MAY 5

1.(1) Y&R: Friday, 5/5: 4.3/5,661,000 (+644,000) [LARGEST GAIN] [MOST VIEWED EPISODE]

2.(2) B&B: Friday, 5/5: 3.1/4,257,000 (+413,000) [MOST VIEWED EPISODE]

3.(3) GH: Friday, 5/5: 2.6/3,502,000 (-77,000) [LARGEST FALL]

4.(7) DAYS: Friday, 5/5: 2.6/3,248,000 (+388,000) [MOST VIEWED EPISODE]

5.(6) OLTL: Friday, 5/5: 2.6/3,223,000 (+131,000)

6.(4) AMC: Friday, 5/5: 2.6/3,196,000 (-75,000)

7.(5) ATWT: Friday, 5/5: 2.4/3,111,000 (-43,000)

8.(8) GL: Friday, 5/5: 2.1/2,711,000 (-21,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Friday, 5/5: 1.5/1,843,000 (+201,000) [MOST VIEWED EPISODE]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Admittedly, I was a latecomer to ATWT (first becoming a regular viewer in 2000). But I really liked KMH's Emily. I thought she was a very specific kind of neurotic professional character, and I loved her prickly relationship with MM's Susan. I will say I don't think the show did her any favors after Hal died, stranding her in storylines with several of the show's dullest characters: nu-Paul, nu-Meg, and nu-Dusty. I actually quite liked one of her last major storylines, when she discovered she had a grown-up biological son with Larry named Hunter. But then Hunter just sort of disappeared, and the story fizzled out, which was pretty typical of the late Goutman years. 
    • I know the fashions have gotten mixed reviews but I actually like what the new costume designer is putting the cast in. It feels more modern and the more tacky pieces I feel make sense for rich people. They're buying for the brand and the price and we often see celebs in things like this. Especially for a character like Nikki, I feel the more over the top (and tacky), the more realistic it is.
    • Well, her staff pointing out the movie connection never seemed to stop Long from using those plots.  She was right about Vanessa--she needed a man who loved her, which she'd never really had up to then. But as others have pointed out, Long borrowed heavily from Taming of the Shrew to get it done. (which while I kinda disputed that, I get more now, having watched Kiss Me Kate a few times since.)
    • "Holly had her share of the blame..." NO, she did NOT. WOW. That's what you get for trying to be fair and giving these people the benefit of the doubt! The Rita rape episodes do not seem to be available. It sounds like Calhoun thought it was not dramatized, but it was. I saw it when it aired. Yes, it's close to 50 years ago, and memories aren't 100% reliable. I also know that Zaslow reportedly complained that it was written too much like a seduction and that's why the Dobsons portrayed Holly's rape differently. Maybe it started like a seduction and she rejected him and that's when it turned violent. I don't remember that part, if it exists. What I do remember is that Roger threw Rita so violently to the floor that she hit her head. They showed him coming at her from her point of view and he looked all fuzzy. It was an act of violence, not a seduction. Rita kept it a secret until it looked like Roger might be acquited, and then finally admitted it. She didn't make it up, it definitely was not a ploy.
    • I was actually referencing another scene between Roger and Alex, which I think is right after they marry.  But yeah---I'm not really impressed with Calhoun's reasoning. Or the "both recall it wasn't unprovoked" line. Wasn't Holly trying to leave him when he raped her? Oy vey.
    • I know we have discussed the location of Bay City in the Another World thread and the fact that originally Irna conceived of it as being the real Bay City MI, and it was later writers that treated it as a fictional Bay City [probably IL]. This article seems to suggest that that idea was well-established by 1981. I wonder when it started.
    • Desert Sun, 22 December 1983 Guiding Light’ writer looks for fresh ideas By TOM JORY Associated Press Writer NEW YORK (AP) - “Guiding Light” has been a daytime companion for millions since 1937, starting on radio and switching to TV after 15 years. Can anything new, really new, ever happen to the Bauers or the Reardons or any of the other folks in Springfield? “I get really upset,” says Pamela Long Hammer, principal writer for the CBS soap opera since March, “because I’ll come up with this neat scenario and someone will say, ‘That’s like “Strangers on a Train.’” “I think, ‘They keep stealing my material.’ “The way I figure it,” she says, “there are only so many stories in the world. It’s the characters who keep the show new and exciting. All of our stories come from them: I don’t come up with a plot, and then work a character into it.” Continuity is important. Someone out there surely knows all that’s happened, to everyone on the show, in 46 years. How about Miss Long Hammer? "Nope. I care about what our core families have been doing,” she says. “I’m always interested in what happened to Bert Bauer (played since 1950 by Charita Bauer) 20 years ago, but as far as going back and reading scripts, no. “Others on the show keep track,” she says. “I’ll suggest something, and be told, ‘You don’t remember, but five years ago, they had this terrible fight. They would never speak to one another now.”’ Miss Long Hammer, a former Miss Alabama who came to New York as an aspiring actress in 1980, began writing for daytime television while playing Ashley on NBC’s “Texas.” She eventually wrote herself out of the story. Her staff for “Guiding Light” includes nine writers, among them her husband, Charles Jay Hammer, whom she met while both worked on “Texas.” NBC dropped “Texas” after two seasons, and episodes from the serial currently are being rerun on the Turner Broadcasting System’s cable-TV SuperStation, WTBS. Gail Kobe, who was executive producer of “Texas,” now has the same job on “Guiding Light.” And Beverlee McKinsey, who played Iris Carrington in “Another World” on NBC, and later in "Texas,” will join the Light” cast of the CBS soap in February. Miss Long Hammer is reponsible for the long-term story, which can mean looking ahead 18 months or more. Staff writers deal with specifics, including the scripts for individual episodes. She says she draws on “imagination and instinct” for the “Guiding Light” story. Often, that involves inventing new characters. “‘I look at Vanessa (Maeve Kinkead), one of our leading ladies,” Miss Long Hammer says. "What could make the audience care more about her? “Then I think, ‘Why can’t she find a man she can love, who will also love her?’ Voila, here comes Billy Lewis (Jordan Clarke). “Another example,” she says, “is Alan Spaulding (Christopher Bernau). All of a sudden, he’s got a sister no one ever knew about. “They come complete,” says Miss Long Hammer of the serial’s characters, including the new ones. “We know who they are and where they came from long before the viewer gets all that information. That’s one of the most interesting things about daytime, the complexities of the characters.” The writers make a big effort to keep the show contemporary, and four of the leading players are in their late teens or early 20s Judi Evans, who plays Beth Raines, Kristi Tesreau (Mindy Lewis), Grant Aleksander (Philip Spaulding) and Michael O’Leary (Rick Bauer). “Guiding Light,” longevity notwithstanding, is a moderate success by that ultimate yardstick of the industry; ratings. The show is behind only “General Hospital,” “All My Children” and “One Life to Live,” all on ABC, and CBS’ “The Young and the Restless,” among soaps. And Miss Long Hammer says she’s convinced writing is the key to even greater achievement. “When I say I love the characters, it’s not a light thing,” she says. “I think what the audience senses is an enthusiasm and an energy among the people who do the show.”
    • I initially read this as Marilyn Manson and did a double take.  Thanks for the screen grabs. The outfits are horrible. Somehow Victoria's Miss Piggy dress is the best. Ashley looks like a French madam bent on revenge, and Abby looks like she hot glued lace scraps to her garbage bag.
    • LOL...I do have the vaguest of memories of Katherine driving her and Phillip Sr to his death. But I don't recall Katherine being as over-the-top as Reva. Surprisingly, I don't even think Brenda Dickinson's Jill was---although lord knows Brenda probably is a real-life Reva. I have read the recaps of earlier Roger, and it surprised me that he doesn't love Holly. He had an affair with Hillary (SHOCK, I tell you, SHOCK when I read that one) while married to her.  Thanks to the cast turnover, other than Jerry and Maureen Garrett, there wasn't anyone else he had worked with, that I can recall. It would've been interesting if Mart Hulswit had still been in the role of Ed, how much more they might've let Ed/Roger clash. I really do have a soft spot in my heart for Krista's Mindy.
    • San Bernardino Sun, 21 July 1981 Soap gets a new lease on life By TOM JORY Associated Press NEW YORK (AP) NBC's Texas premiered Aug. 4, 1980, in the toughest time slot in daytime TV opposite top rated General Hospital on ABC and CBS' enduring -Guiding Light As recently as the first of this year, " Texas appeared doomed, a victim of barely measurable ratings. All that has changed, and the show approaches its first anniversary with a new executive producer, a new team of writers, a new look and a new slant on life. Even the ratings have improved a bit, from 14 percent to l5 percent of the audience in the time period in November and December to 15 percent to 16 percent today. "We have Houston like Ryan's Hope has New York City," says Gail Kobe who took over Texas as executive supervising producer in March,"and we feel a real tie with that city. We've got to reflect in the show what's happening in that real town, and I think we're doing that." It was a significant step, taking Texas- its roots in the fictional Bay City of NBC's Another World -to a real-life setting. "I don't think it's got to be  the kind of place that people can't can't find on the map," says Ms. Kobe "I think the audience in daytime is more prepared for reality today." It meant giving the show a recognizable Houston backdrop, a more contemporary sound -country and western performers like Ray Price will appear periodically and a lighting system that would clearly represent the hot, bright Texas sunlight. . Texas faced difficult odds from the start, the competition and the inevitable comparison with CBS' prime-time superhit, Dallas, notwithstanding. There was the problem of introducing a multiplicity of characters, many of them imports from Another World, as well as a story line, in an hour-long format. "It was the first show to start at an hour," says Kobe, a former actress who had been supervising producer for Procter & Gamble Productions, which owns Texas and five other daytime shows. "It's very difficult to fill that much time with a large cast, and not leave the viewer confused. "With a daily show, you have to let the audience know who to root for," she says. ''And if you're trying to begin a story, too, no one's going to keep track." The changes began even before Kobe took the show from Paul Rauch, who had faced the seemingly impossible task of producing both Texas and Another World simultaneously. Beverlee McKinsey, whose generally unpleasant character, Iris, had come to Texas from Another World as a young ingenue, was given back her mean streak.  "She had become a sweet woman,"Kobe says, "and the audience was used to seeing her do terrible things. It just didn't work." In addition, she says, time was spent establishing the identities of the characters. Joyce and Bill Corrington, who had created the show with Rauch, were replaced as head writers in February by Dorothy Purser and Samuel Ratcliffe.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy