I tuned in to see Jeremy. He's cute. I'd rather he be paired with Stephanie than the serial killer.

 

 

4 hours ago, Soapsuds said:

I tuned in to see Jeremy. He's cute. I'd rather he be paired with Stephanie than the serial killer.

I wouldn’t mind it.

Hopefully, he’ll just be a gray character as opposed to flat out evil. And besides, Ron’s gone; another character doesn’t need to be sacrificed for his precious RSW 😂😂

I’m not familiar with Michael Roark’s work. Were you watching Y&R when he was on? 

Edited October 3Oct 3 by AbcNbc247

Meanwhile, justice for Charlotte, where is she?  Thomas is being played a fool by Rachel.  And, Charlotte is still "upstairs".  I hope Charlotte doesn't get Bobby Martin-ed, and the next thing we see is a pair of skis in the Horton attic.  

Also, just to clarify the in-universe cannon, in Salem, it is harder for the son of the richest man in town, and the daughter of the richest woman in town to adopt a child, than for an escaped convict, who ran drugs and beat his girlfriend to be an elementary school teacher?

Furthermore, @AbcNbc247, I believe Doug³ left some of his leather jacket collection behind for Jeremy.

Edited October 3Oct 3 by j swift

9 hours ago, Soapsuds said:

I tuned in to see Jeremy. He's cute. I'd rather he be paired with Stephanie than the serial killer.

 

 

That would be pretty problematic considering he tried to drown her in a hot tub while they were dating years ago. I honestly don't know how you can realistically get past that without making Stephanie look dumb and foolish in the process. Also I'm pretty much expecting the writers to portray Jeremy as total scum just to make Alex look better in comparison. 

I have no idea why Johnny/Chanel don't explore surrogacy.  They have the money and it seems like adoption is becoming an issue for them.  I appreciate them wanting to adopt a child in need, so they can wait that process out or just move on to other options.  It's not as if Kayla said Chanel could NEVER get pregnant. There's a lot of hand wringing over something that can be solved easily for them.

5 hours ago, j swift said:

Furthermore, @AbcNbc247, I believe Doug³ left some of his leather jacket collection behind for Jeremy.

That could work 😂

Technically, they're related too.

11 minutes ago, AbcNbc247 said:

That could work 😂

Technically, they're related too.

Doug³ left with that mini-backpack, he couldn't fit all those Varvedos leather jackets he wore.

6 hours ago, AbcNbc247 said:

 

I’m not familiar with Michael Roark’s work. Were you watching Y&R when he was on? 

Unfortunately, I wasn't watching, so I'm new to his work.

Just now, Soapsuds said:

Unfortunately, I wasn't watching, so I'm new to his work.

I'm sure a Y&R fan on here will say something about him.

He does have a cute smile though 😊😂😂

1 hour ago, MissPhoenixGirl92 said:

That would be pretty problematic considering he tried to drown her in a hot tub while they were dating years ago. I honestly don't know how you can realistically get past that without making Stephanie look dumb and foolish in the process. Also I'm pretty much expecting the writers to portray Jeremy as total scum just to make Alex look better in comparison. 

I haven't been watching Days, so I'm unfamiliar with their history.

Just now, AbcNbc247 said:

 

He does have a cute smile though 😊😂😂

 

6 hours ago, AbcNbc247 said:

I’m not familiar with Michael Roark’s work. Were you watching Y&R when he was on? 

I saw him on Y&R.  His character "Travis" was Victoria Newman's fling she met at a bar, and she told him her name was "Tori" -- because she went into the bar to have some incognito fun and let loose and she claimed to be a receptionist.  She set a boundary that she would not tell him her last name.
He was younger than her and a hot lay.  He seemed to be a working class bartender who was soon revealed to own the bar -- but still was working class.  Victoria and Travis had a lot of sex. He eventually learns Tori is Victoria Newman, and they continue their relationship secretly.  Eventually Victoria learns that Travis was once a wealthy stockbroker long ago.   At some point, Victoria and Travis go public with their relationship. 
Later, something else about his past is revealed and he leaves town.

To be honest all I remember that is that his character Travis was a hot lay and a good relationship for the normally uptight Victoria Newman.  He was good for her, and got her to laugh, and it was disappointing when he was written out of the show.
I thought Michael Roark did a good job.

Here is a very detailed summary of his entire run on Y&R:
https://theyoungandtherestless.fandom.com/wiki/Travis_Crawford

Edited October 3Oct 3 by janea4old

2 minutes ago, janea4old said:

I saw him on Y&R.  His character "Travis" was Victoria Newman's fling she met at a bar, and she told him her name was "Tori" -- because she went into the bar to have some incognito fun and let loose and she claimed to be a receptionist.  She set a boundary that she would not tell him her last name.
He was younger than her and a hot lay.  He seemed to be a working class bartender who was soon revealed to own the bar -- but still was working class.  Victoria and Travis had a lot of sex. He eventually learns Tori is Victoria Newman, and they continue their relationship secretly.  Eventually Victoria learns that Travis was once a wealthy stockbroker long ago.   At some point, Victoria and Travis go public with their relationship. 
Later, something else about his past is revealed and he leaves town.

To be honest all I remember that is that his character Travis was a hot lay and a good relationship for the normally uptight Victoria Newman.  He was good for her, and it was disappointing when he was written out of the show.
I thought Michael Roark did a good job.

Here is a very detailed summary of his entire run on Y&R:
https://theyoungandtherestless.fandom.com/wiki/Travis_Crawford

Thanks!

So, I have a question. When did DAYS stop being a Peacock exclusive??? I noticed today it no longer says that at the beginning. It may have been gone awhile, but today is when I noticed 🤷🏾‍♂️🤷🏾‍♂️🤷🏾‍♂️

It’s always fascinating how some fans expect Theo to simply move past being shot, yet insist Sami should never have forgiven EJ. The way we measure pain and redemption seems to shift depending on whose story we’re watching.

The “just get over it” rhetoric doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. Yes, Theo made peace with JJ and even worked alongside him in South Africa. But he’s also been clear: JJ’s immediate return to the police force felt like a betrayal. Expecting a victim not only to forgive their shooter but to endorse their career choices without hesitation? That’s a strange standard to set.

I’m not calling out any one post. This is more a reaction to a particularly tone-deaf Facebook comment. But I genuinely don’t understand why the distinction between forgiveness and unconditional support is so hard to grasp. They’re not the same thing, and they never have been.