Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

She only wanted to scare them. Well, also humiliate them. But, of course, you are perfectly entitled to your own list! This is my polite way of telling you to get your hands off of my list! 

 

  • Members
Posted

Listen guys, I don’t care what we saw that she did, but my girl Dana/Lesie/Shelly is INNOCENT and is just getting what’s due to her! I refuse to see it any other way!

Please register in order to view this content

  • Members
Posted

Tell that to the potential PTSD that someone might suffer from "a scare" like that. It's illegal. It's disgusting. If someone did that to me... I would sue them TILL THE END. I would not let them have a bright day in their life. I've sued people for a lot less that that. Believe me. Hayley needs to step her sh-t up and take legal action against the psycho. 

  • Members
Posted

Goings is fine but Loren Lott is great, tougher and would be a considerably more difficult tug of war for audience loyalty! I stand by it.

  • Members
Posted

I think it’s a major issue that Dani keeps getting enabled and people keep kissing her ass. And those who call her out are also quick to backtrack and excuse her actions (Nicole and Anita). 

She needs a character on her side that sees things more clearly and that can be brutally honest with her and her inherent toxicity. 

  • Members
Posted

You are 100 percent right.

I'm starting to think... maybe subconsciously all these people enabling her... like to see her like this. It makes all of them appear so much saner and normal. I've seen family members in my own family... keeping a person unstable and refusing to help them or acknowledge a problem (I have a cousin with bipolar disorder that is constantly getting excused for her outbursts - including breaking furniture and slapping her mother on every day basis)... just because it makes their persona look better in comparison. Some people like to be all high and mighty... and feel above others. I have no idea if this is the case... but enablers have co-dependent relationships with the people they enable. And in the case of Dani... the toxicity is becoming more and more apparent. 

And agree again - there is no EXCUSING what she did. I don't care if that was a circus trick... a joke... a scare tactic... I saw what I saw...!

  • Members
Posted

As for the sacrificial lamb, while it could be Naomi I could also see it being Nicole at the hands of Leslie/Dana (maybe even accidentally). Nicole's death would cause ripples and could cause lots of stories with the DuPree's blaming Ted.

Posted

Hayley has enough problems of her own. Besides, with the way she feels about the Dupree family, there is no way she would even consider litigation. Have you met Hayley? The person you are describing does not seem to be much like her. And, name-calling is beneath you. It's not beneath everyone but it is of you. A psycho would tend not to have logical motivation. Dani is full well 100% motivated, if not by anyone else, at least by the LOUT, her torturer, you know him by the name Bill. 

  • Members
Posted

Particularly with Vernon - it was totally tone deaf the other day to have him try to equate his arrests during the Civil Rights movement to Dani’s arrest. Who approved that? They need to have a warning. 

  • Members
Posted

Very much this. May Sweeps is going to be popping.

Please register in order to view this content

 

lol

Don't you put that out there for Nicole. You all can have Naomi.  

  • Members
Posted

I thought Vernon saying that was to demonstrate the Duprees' selective hypocrisy re: their own interests. Like any powerful soap family. I also thought it was probably too soon.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • No.  I recall there was also a mention about how distracting it was EOB's Gwen wasn't wearing nail polish as well.  That it was someone's pet peeve. And, yes, the fact characters can have a manicure in prison is the wildest continuity issue here.
    • Can anyone remember Mary Ellen Stuart's run as Jenny? I'm trying to fill in the cracks for missing stuff that we overlooked.  Bulletpoints:  * Dated Ross * Rusty's police partner * Directly responsible for Dinah coming forward about George Stewart (Cam's father)
    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton twirling his invisible moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Thanks for asking that!  Back when we had another major event upcoming (a party or the concert), I had intended to ask what everyone here was planning to wear.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy