Members vetsoapfan Posted February 4 Members Share Posted February 4 Yes, TPTB failed miserably with the recasting of Meg too. Thinking of all the recasts as totally different characters was our only option, considering how drastically different the new interpretations of the characters were in the hands of the newbies. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Reverend Ruthledge Posted February 4 Members Share Posted February 4 I think this was under Marland's watch, but I never thought of KMH as Emily Stewart even though she was in the role a lot longer than MS. Different show, but I felt the same about Jill on Y&R. I never thought of Jess Walton as Jill. I just thought of her as a different character. No matter how long she was on the show. Some people just personify a character perfectly and nobody can take their place. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Jdee43 Posted February 4 Members Share Posted February 4 All My Children should still be on the air. Frons the most incompetent head of daytime of them all. And the arrogance. His legacy is only negative. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted February 4 Members Share Posted February 4 (edited) That's why I said if he had cared. I know his history with soaps. Search for Tomorrow alone. I loved Melanie Smith's Emily enough to where I would have had a hard time accepting a recast, but I don't think Kelley was ever a good choice. She ticked boxes of vulnerability or sex appeal, but she lacked the heart. Her shadings tended to veer more toward pathetic and sleazy. Even just walking around A&M she gave porn star. Melanie's Emily was never that way, even when she was cheating and behaving badly. Kelley had some good moments, especially during Emily/Hal, but she was never Emily to me. Edited February 4 by DRW50 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted February 4 Members Share Posted February 4 I understand now. What I heard was if he *genuinely* cared but you were after the whole shebang & it was about his NOT caring, period. Gotcha! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Chris B Posted February 4 Members Share Posted February 4 I agree with you about KMH as Emily. I thought she was very limited as an actress and couldn't handle the material given to her. It was hard to warm to her Emily or be truly empathetic to the situations she'd get herself into. On the subject of GL's Peapack days which were discussed previously, I still say they could've made that work. ATWT never looked the way GL did and at times GL did use the format to it's benefit and could deliver decent episodes. I feel like the main reason this didn't work is because it was too much of a learning curve and the people in charge weren't qualified to make it work. If ever there was a time to bring in someone like Mal Young it was then. The shaky camera was a choice, a bad choice. So was the dreadful music, random scenes filmed in the middle of the woods and not adapting the writing to fit the new format. British soaps had already mastered that format and could've helped them do it the right way. They should've cut back the cast and built up a community feeling again. I remember Ellen Wheeler bragging about how they transformed their studio so they had a set for pretty much anything, even a nail salon. I feel like even that was a mistake. They were set up to fail. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 I think GL was also just done. The show was incredibly lucky to have lasted as long as it did. Ellen Wheeler probably was not the right choice to take that journey, but if they'd had another year, they could have made it work. I think some of the choices did work, just not enough, and I think GL at its core was a punchy show that could have benefited from a lo-fi look. Just not the one they got. I'd still rather watch some of that last year again than most of what ATWT was putting out. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 Yes, well, I was still a daily watcher of both, but If I ask myself which I preferred watching at that point, it's GL over ATWT. It's true, I believe that what GL needed at that point was a very extremely experienced EP & they only considered two candidates, both of whom were totally inexperienced as an EP. Directing, yes both trained & experienced. But, EP all they had was shadowing Goutman for some part of a year. Then of the two they picked EW & she was left to sink, swim, drown, I don't know walk on water? They wish, I guess. BTW, they here is P&G. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JoeCool Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 (edited) Disagree on ABC soaps. Disney bought ABC in July 1995. Disney CEO Michael Eisner was VP of Daytime in the 1970s and was a huge supporter of the soaps. The soaps on ABC made money in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The soaps' solid performances were cited in DIsney yearly reports to shareholders and I as a shareholder have the reports and read them. Disney integrated the soaps into the theme parks and had events and cruise trips. Disney made plenty of money from the soaps. In 2000 Disney created the SoapNet cable network that aired the ABC lineup plus Ryan's Hope and eventually Days and Restless. When DIsney canceled SoapNet in 2010 and was shifting over to Disney Junior that signaled the death of the ABC soaps. Purely business and money. Frons was the instrument that was used to execute Disney's plan. AMC gone in 2011. OLTL in 2012. Conversion to Disney Junior comlplete in June 2012. Purely business. GH will go eventually it is not a matter of if but when. Once Eisner left as CEO in 2005 the soaps lost their strongest supporter and the soaps were doomed. Edited February 5 by JoeCool 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 "ABC was actually valued less after Disney's acquisition than it was previously." (HER STORIES 216) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JoeCool Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 (edited) True but ESPN was the jewel of the transaction and was undervalued at the time of the transaction. Eisner wanted ABC and ESPN so the deal worked. ABC's value to DIsney subsequently increased after the tranasction. Disney wanted the sports and ESPN then ABC. ABC and ESPN were linked. Eisner wanted them both. Eventually Disney's stock went up as well. Edited February 5 by JoeCool 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 And, it was a bit of a dirty trick because their other assets were so very different from Daytime Drama that the de-valuation was more about accounting than anything else. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JoeCool Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 ABC bought AMC and OLTL from Agnes Nixon for about $10 to $20 million in 1975. Those assets were paid bought and very profitable by the time DIsney purchased Cap. Cities/ABC. Disney bought Caps Cities for primetime ABC and ESPN...the daytime shows on ABC were a bonus. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 Please register in order to view this content 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JoeCool Posted February 5 Members Share Posted February 5 When Cap Cities bought ABC in 1985 the value of the transaction was $3 billion. When Disney bought Cap Cities in 1995 the value of the transaction was $19 billion. ABC Daytime was a drop in a huge bucket there. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.