Jump to content

ALL: Bad Moves by Well Regarded Soap Writers/EPs


Planet Soap

Recommended Posts

  • Members

It was either Ryan's Hope or GH and of course once GH went to an hour it became one of the biggest shows on tv. I think it was one of those things where you had to strike when the iron was hot. To launch a new soap and be as successful as Ryan's Hope was, it needed to happen early on. Once GH became the focus everything changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 277
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

She was so against it. Pete started it & thought he wanted it & then regretted it after they went to an hour & fought against going to 90 minutes & ultimately quit over it. Agnes told Pete he was crazy & that she'd never do it. ABC offered her studio space, which was coveted & help on money for more actors & she let herself be persuaded. Bill Bell was just as against it as Labine was & CBS said they were going to do it with him or without him so he could pick. So Pete got in via ignorance & with Agnes they used the carrot & with Bell they used the stick. The change was more beneficial to the network than the show so they were seriously motivated. Susan Flannery left DAYS over it. She was that against it. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Ultimately I think the expansion to 30 minutes was damaging to the genre. The fact that Another World agreed to be a 90-minute scripted series 5 days a week is insane.

I like 30 minutes because there's less filler in an episode, it keeps you from having to expand the cast massively to fill the hour, and the writers only have to pen out half the dialogue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think a classic bad move by Agnes Nixon on AMC, that was repeated elsewhere as well, was not setting up the next generation until it was way too late.

Erica not having a child earlier, rather than being saddled with a two insta-kids by later writers, was poor planning.  Similarly, AW's Felicia, and other leading female characters were burdened by these odd circumstances of forgetting that they had given birth decades earlier, and then those offspring magically appeared in town (often with a chip on their shoulder).  As a result, the multigenerational aspects of the stories never seemed organic, to me.

Not every female character needed a child, but a younger sister, or a niece, would've sufficed to set up a family tree before these women were middle-aged.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

According to Tom Lisanti's book, it was in 1977 when ABC approached Labine and Mayer about expanding RH to an hour. It was shortly after AMC expanded to an hour. ABC proposed expanding RH to an hour and giving it a better timeslot. I assume RH would have aired in the 3:00 to 4:00 p.m. timeslot. I guess this was around the time that ABC was considering canceling GH. Had Labine and Mayer accepted ABC's offer, I wonder what would have aired in the 12:30 to 1:00 p.m. timeslot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Everyone's entitled to their opinion....but I'm of the opinion that GH was correct in telling daytime's most famous and highest rated storyline.

Claire Labine had an amazing start to GH that lasted almost 18 months. This came to a crashing halt by overlapping the cancer and AIDS stories. While both were well written and acted, combined they totally sucked the energy out of the show. Even "fun" stories at the time such as Lois' wedding felt like they had an air of melancholy hovering over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy