Jump to content

GH: August 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I had actually considered that possibility.  Maybe she is Olivia.  That would explain why she had some familiarity with people, as well as mannerisms that could allow her to pass for Ava, along with considerable effort on her part.

This idea would allow that new writing team to abandon the direction that PM took the character, at least in part.  It could allow for a partial "redemption" of Ava, just enough to keep her out of jail, and sharing custody of Avery.  Come to think of it, Olivia being the replacement could explain why she was so determined to fight for Avery, since they could claim that she was determined to have a family of her own by raising her niece as her daughter.

Edited by StevieM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I thought the opening scene with Kristina dreaming of holding the adorable baby then waking up and sobbing was pretty good. She lost my sympathy with the “my baby” convo with Alexis after though. It was Molly and TJ’s child and the only reason the baby is dead is because you ran your behind to Ava’s hotel room. I did like her asking Sonny to take care of Ava at the end though, let her embrace her inner Cassadine and Corinthos.

Ava, Ava, Ava. I was wondering what her next move could possibly be and holding the identity of who really was after Sonny is a decent play I guess…even though I’m pretty sure she doesn't know it was Pikeman for real. I still like her and Jagger teaming up.

I enjoy having the Sonny/Carly/Jason threesome back on good terms but I am kind of sad to see Jason back to being Sonny’s errand boy as soon as he’s free from the FBI. Feels like they just went right back to default instead of exploring something different with him.

Scott was his usual slimey lawyer self today and I just don’t care for Heather or this hip story or how Portia is seemingly going under the bus for it. I did like that Trina finally got to say her peace to Heather.

So far this “rebooted” writing team has brought some energy back to the show and I do like how characters careers are actually being utilized (Felicia as patient advocate being todays good example). For now I’m more willing to stick around as a viewer than I thought I would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

8/7

And just like that Sonny’s tampered meds is wrapped up in a pretty bow. How stupid. Now he’s going to be fine and as per usual he will now get one over on Ava and she’s going to lose custody of her child because he got bored of her

Please register in order to view this content

. This writing is so stupid.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No.  The law is absolutely clear about this.  The baby was Kristina's.  She was the mother.  She was never actually TJ and Molly's surrogate.  That was just the term they chose to use.

Kristina, like all pregnant women, including those planning an adoption, was an expectant mother.  And when a pregnant woman, like Kristina, gives birth, she is the new mom.  That includes women who have previously said that they are inclined to agree to an adoption. 

TJ was the baby's father.  But Molly was not the mother.  She was never the adoptive mother because there was never an adoption.  Molly was the prospective adoptive parent.  That means that she had reason to believe she would become a parent at a later date, but certainly not a guarantee.  Even if she did ultimately adopt the baby, that still wasn't her baby that Kristina was carrying or that she gave birth to.  Kristina was carrying her and TJ's baby, and she gave birth to her and TJ's baby.

If the adoption had moved forward, after the child was born, then a termination of parental rights would have been issued.  At that point Molly would become an adoptive mother and Kristina would become a birth mother/first mother/natural mother, or whichever term you prefer to use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@StevieM

I honestly don’t care about the legalese of it all. Kristina had no interest in having a baby beforehand and was only doing it so her sister could have one. Changing your mind last minute and wanting to keep the baby for yourself was a shitty selfish thing to do and being so reckless you end up flying out of a window and causing the baby to die is even worse. Her whole “my my my” spiel was just more disrespect to the two people who trusted her with all of their hopes for starting a family that her own actions killed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

TJ/Molly had a legal contract for surrogacy with Kristina.   It was spoken about multiple times.  It was not adoption.  Yes, Kristina had to ultimately sign it after giving birth, but it was not a maybe/maybe not adoption issue.  Kristina wouldn't just be able to walk out with the baby and fight with TJ.  Both Alexis and Molly are lawyers.  You don't think they would follow laws?  Lol

It doesn't make Kristina right.  It's just not as easy in the state of NY as @StevieM you make it out to be.

Edited by carolineg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you. This is exactly how I feel. That was Molly and TJ’s baby until Kristina decided to change Her mind and ended up getting the baby killed.

I almost did. When Sonny gets full custody again which I’m almost positive about, I think I’m going to be done watching. I’ll catch Ric scenes on YouTube and just read this thread to see if there’s anything else worth catching up on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The contract was not legally binding, and that was also spoken of multiple times.  Kristina was acknowledged as having the right to keep her baby.  Molly could not have gone to court and forced an adoption.  That is what the show said about how it works in their fictional universe.

In real life, it also works that way.  Kristina carried the baby, and it was biologically hers.  She could only terminate her rights after the baby was born.  That is how it works in most states, certainly including New York.  Many states also have a waiting period and require the adoption to take place in a courtroom.  And Kristina absolutely had the legal right to back out of her initially stated plan to allow Molly to adopt HER baby.

In both real life and the GH universe, Kristina most definitely would have been within her rights to walk out of the hospital with her baby.  Even TJ would not have been the legal father until he established his paternity, either by petitioning the court to order a paternity test, or by prevailing upon Kristina to allow him to sign the birth certificate.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lol.  We clearly are watching two different shows apparently.   Because that is absolutely not what happened on screen.   Are you pretending to be a lawyer or legal expert or something?

Moving on...

Edited by carolineg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I reject the moral premise of your argument.  Kristina could not have known how she would feel before she got pregnant, let alone before she gave birth.  And the fact that she didn't want a baby is irrelevant.  The only thing that matters is that she wanted the particular baby she was pregnant with--she wanted HER baby.  

The pain that Molly feels over her infertility, as well as the pain of a failed adoption plan, pales in comparison to the devastation that Kristina would have suffered had Molly succeeded in her goal to facilitate a coerced adoption.  Molly fully understood that the adoption she had hoped for was falling apart.  She understood that Kristina wanted to keep her baby.  Once she recognized that, she should have let it go.  She should have allowed TJ and Kristina to work out their situation pertaining to their daughter.  Instead, Molly used Kristina's love for her as a weapon with which to bully her into giving up her child.

Edited by StevieM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Apparently, I saw what happened on screen very differently than you did.

It doesn't really matter to me, though.  My point is that in real life Kristina would not have been seen as having issued a voluntary TPR (termination of parental rights), nor would her actions, agreements and promises have been legitimate grounds for a court to issue an involuntary TPR.

I am not a lawyer or a legal expert, nor am I pretending to be.  I just know a little something about the basics of adoption.  The laws are set up to favor the adoptive parents when there is a conflict.  But even still, there are limits.  Molly couldn't benefit from a system set up to benefit adoptive parents because she never was one.  She was a prospective adoptive parent, nothing more.  The baby was never hers.  Kristina was the mother.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Beverlee was on a whole other level from Kim. It's not like they were in competition with each other. I get the feeling that Kim had a slight problem with the super-professional, serious cast members who just wanted everyone to be prepared and do the work, as she seems to like having fun on set. (She's made a few cracks about Chris Bernau being like that). Bev was definitely one of those. But they didn't work together that much. Yeah, they made her manic and also much weaker. She always had a vulnerability, but wanting to kill herself over that guy? No way. Not only that, he didn't leave her! She insisted he marry Maeve. When they did the tribute to Bert/Charita, the compilation of scenes with her showed how much the cast had been almost totally turned over in a relatively short period of time. Nearly every shot was of her by herself because most people she had worked with had been fired, left or been replaced. I assume they couldn't show her with people who hadn't been replaced, like Don Stewart, Elvera Roussel, or Robert Newman because they would have had to pay them for using their clips. It's dreadful to watch. Like she had no connection to the current show.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • A little too much focus on Chad and Cat today but I enjoyed the episode. I have a feeling that Jennifer’s gonna get dumped on though, even though I think that her anger is completely understandable and justified. And honestly, Ron is finally gone; Abigail can come back now.  But, welcome back, Anna! It was nice seeing Carrie have scenes with her mother. Christie Clark and Leann Hunley have never really had that many scenes together and to see them have them now is really nice. I’m glad that both of them were there to comfort Marlena too. Their words were definitely the thing that Marlena needed to hear. Btw, with all this talk of Noah, does it mean that he’s gonna be introduced soon? Amy, revealing that John changed her flat tire many years ago seemed a little random though. I would rather she have said something about how everybody in Salem knows of John Black because of how he was always such a hero. But at the same time, her story also showed what a great guy John was.  I liked Kate’s scenes with Philip too, and her promise to get back at Xander for what he did. And since we didn’t see JPL in the bed, did he need some time off or something? And yeah, everything involving ‘One Stormy Night’ still seems very Ron-like to me.
    • The second photo featuring the late John Spencer is from the Law & Order episode, "Prescription For Death", which was the (second) pilot/first episode all the way back in 1990! He played the father of a daughter that had gone to the ER for a mere sore throat but ended up dead because the doctor on call was drunk and had given her medication that she had an adverse reaction to, after receiving some other medication. So, he will always have that great distinction in addition to The West Wing. (The first pilot, "Everybody's Favorite Bagman", was filmed in 1988! The show was offered to CBS, but they passed. In syndication, it is oddly placed as the sixth episode of Season 1. And Roy Thinnes played DA Alfred Wentworth there. When NBC picked up the show two years later, Thinnes declined to return, and that's how we got Steven Hill's DA Adam Schiff.)
    • exactly. I can understand schadenfreude if it were real, but a lot of this is just an engineered distraction.
    • Days of our Lives S60E204 – Thursday, June 5, 2025 Okay, today’s episode was kind of boring. It was nice seeing Jack and Jen back, but they wasted an entire episode on Jen chatting with Julie - one scene would’ve been enough. Also, why didn’t Jack and Jen go comfort Marlena? And wouldn’t a flashback with Jack, Jen, and John have been great? Maybe something from the Cruise of Deception era? Bottom line - it feels like once John’s memorial is over and the returning fan favorites leave Salem… the show’s going to be dull again.
    • Everything with Elon and Trump is a stunt. If people, and the sycophantic press, are talking about their "feud," they are not talking about Republican plans to gut Medicare, Medicaid, and the ACA. 
    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
    • Having the majority of the cast on those low numbers is no way to tell story. And just 2 dayplayers for the month. So sad for the #1 soap.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy