Jump to content

GH: July 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 777
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I am confused as to how Ava thought she'd get away with this whole scheme.  Now it's possible Ava doesn't care although she went out of her way to cover it up.  Natalia is horrible and deserves whatever she gets, but obviously Ava would know she would remember the conversation they had.  Natalia isn't an idiot.   This is such a low stakes move too.  Now Sonny can't date Natalia, Blaze is out of the closet, and for some reason Kristina can't run her center.  

Ava should have gone for maximum chaos! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL!!! Yes, Ava barely made a dent in the fabric .... VERY FUNNY.

But, I take your point about how in heck Ava might have had any semblance at all of getting away with it. I've never seen so many people learn a hush-hush secret so fast in my entire life. 

I cannot wait for Friday to see Kristina go one on one with Natalia!

In Rocky & Bullwinkle what is the female's name? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really am just not understanding Ava's motivation or how she thought it would somehow stay secret.  This plan just made no sense and it makes Ava look dumb.  She should have went with the meds plan from Day One especially since she already knew about it for months.

I think the lady in Rocky and Bullwinkle's name is Natasha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is peanuts. As I said it does nothing to damage Sonny's bottom line or make a move on him. If Ava wanted to get away clean she should've met Natalia in public, plied her with drinks and then been able to blame it on someone like DeWitt targeting Blaze's mother. But still, what does this get her tactically? Nothing. It's just the show meandering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm seeing people on Twitter who are demanding writers be fired due to this story. I hope those people were as adamant over past stories along these lines or stories that were much worse in spreading anti-gay views, including a storyline where a gay man sexually harassed a rape victim.

I do think people need to go, but less because of some statement of homophobia (maybe I'm wrong, but I imagine at some point Natalia will come to support her daughter) than the story making no damn sense. 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy