26 minutes ago, Liberty City said:

The O.G. article never cited that horrible gossip rag. They stated it as fact.

I don't know how it appeared on October 5 when TV Insider first published it.

But archive.org shows that as of October 6, TV Insider cited the laundry site
https://web.archive.org/web/20231006205224/https://www.tvinsider.com/1107373/john-mccook-the-bold-and-the-beautiful-eric-forrester-dying-contract/

18 minutes ago, janea4old said:

I don't know how it appeared on October 5 when TV Insider first published it.

But archive.org shows that as of October 6, TV Insider cited the laundry site
https://web.archive.org/web/20231006205224/https://www.tvinsider.com/1107373/john-mccook-the-bold-and-the-beautiful-eric-forrester-dying-contract/

The O.G. October 5 report had zero mention of CDL.

This is why we need Michael Logan back.

Yeah she's right. I don't remember seeing the mention of CDL when they first published it. They had "set side sources" is all it said

4 hours ago, dragonflies said:

I wonder if they are really killing off Eric

 

 

 

As I've been playing catch-up, I've been seriously wondering that as well. And JG is acting her butt off. 

Oh, wow. I wonder if they really are killing him off because JM wanted to retire.

If he does leave, I hope they have characters move into the Forrester mansion. It would be a shame to lose that set since it was there from day one.

Our luck Eric's shares of FC will go to either Brooke or Donna 🙄

10 minutes ago, dragonflies said:

Our luck Eric's shares of FC will go to either Brooke or Donna 🙄

Nah somehow Liam will get them.😂

19 minutes ago, Soapsuds said:

Nah somehow Liam will get them.😂

2 hours ago, janea4old said:

I don't know how it appeared on October 5 when TV Insider first published it.

But archive.org shows that as of October 6, TV Insider cited the laundry site
https://web.archive.org/web/20231006205224/https://www.tvinsider.com/1107373/john-mccook-the-bold-and-the-beautiful-eric-forrester-dying-contract/

 

1 hour ago, Liberty City said:

The O.G. October 5 report had zero mention of CDL.

This is why we need Michael Logan back.

 

1 hour ago, dragonflies said:

Yeah she's right. I don't remember seeing the mention of CDL when they first published it. They had "set side sources" is all it said

Ah, okay, well then the original having no mention of the laundry site, -- maybe that could explain how it got past the TV insider editor/manager/whatever.

Edited October 30, 20232 yr by janea4old

I mean I could be wrong, but I do remember seeing "set site sources" on their

1 hour ago, Soapsuds said:

Nah somehow Liam will get them.😂

THE HORROR!!!

7 minutes ago, 1974mdp said:

THE HORROR!!!