Jump to content

SOD is ending it's weekly print edition


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 182
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Sad for sure, a definitive sign of the times. I was a subscriber from 1995-2004 and then….

 


 

 

LOL even 20 years ago the bottom fell out and the prices skyrocketed lol, which is when I cancelled my subscription. 
 

And for whatever reason, SOD had a fantastic early online presence there from 1996-2000ish, then disappeared for like two years LMAO and then their online presence after that was always terrible…”read more in the latest issue!” Major yikes!

SOD’s content stopped being fun. SOD awards were deliberately rigged and then stopped being held. Thumbs up/down columns, top ten lists, the joke lists, and in depth articles and analysis on shows current and historical storylines became non existent. Fan mail became censored. Softball Interviews became softer than Downy sheets. Carolyn Hinsey became very offensive and very obnoxious. Every other weekly cover became “The Plan to save DAYS!” VCR/DVR alerts became snooze alerts. And ratings boxes were increasingly less exciting and became obscured. 
 

At least SOD has never gone the SPW route and tried to cover American Idol and America’s Got Talent for “soapy” content but I digress. I’ve gotten my soap News off the web from SON and other sites for years now rather than SOD. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So many great memories attached to that magazine.  I am slightly sad to see it go.

You have to hand it to them, they survived as a digest of the weekly plots even after the advent of VCRs, DVRs, and streaming.  You certainly couldn't pitch it as a viable venture today.

But, who will answer those age-old questions like was Phyllis Diller the mother of Susan Lucci?

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course their awards were rigged. Days won every year. No way...

Please register in order to view this content

Same about getting my soap news online and ratings. Not only did I not buy them but I stopped reading them at stores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It takes about 10 minutes to flick through an issue. Most of the info is old news by the time the issue comes out.

The occasional interview can be of interest but otherwise...

I'm surprised they didn't lean in more to the archives and republish old articles/interviews. Maybe have a wrap section each issue eg Lucci through the years with old photos/interviews or Days in the 80's etc

And when The Doctors turned up on Retro publish the synopses once the show got to 1975.

They needed to provide some point of difference.

And some of those photo shopped covers...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Rather than kick a horse when it's down, I want to recall when it was fun.  Like when they actually had in-house photographers, and art directors, who gave us iconic images

Please register in order to view this content

I remember going to the grocery every Tuesday and picking up a copy, a bag of jellybeans, and that was an amazing evening of entertainment.  I'm sad for those too young to remember when it went from bi-monthly to weekly, or when the comings and goings section went from the middle of the magazine to front. The ridiculous questions in the back.  Their relentless dragging of the daytime emmys.  The way that the black and white photos were sometimes printed slightly off center.  And the detailed descriptions of the dialogue and costumes when actual people wrote the synopses. 

There's time enough for Monday morning quarterbacking about what went wrong, I want to celebrate the memory of what it meant to us as a community.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Hold up, hold up, hold up!!!   MADISON MONTGOMERY???   If a Zoe, Misty Day, and/or Queenie shows up...lol.
    • The Producers Guild of America (PGA), while not a union, does have rules and regulations regarding membership, conduct, and yes, credits. Assuming she’s a member of course. Being uncredited for what work exactly? Given her years of experience and multiple Emmy wins - why now decide you want to go uncredited for work you’ve done? 
    • That's very sad. What party he represented for and which area he represented? 
    • -- Daisy is a terrible name. If you're not going with a family legacy name, you gotta do better than that. -- When Frank is done with a character, he makes sure that character is painted in the worst possible way and the shade is thrown in the script. Natalia is being treated like a punchline to a bad joke....not that I mind. -- So Cody talked about Britt today. Gee, I wonder what's going on.
    • I remember another Phyllis residence -- I don't think that was a set shown abovethread, but I'm not sure.  Trying to remember some things off the top of my head but I might be wrong about part of it: I'm referring to the condo where Phick first had sex after the Michael/Lauren wedding.  I think they specifically referred to it as a condo?  After Stafford's Phyllis went into a coma, Jack sold it and I think he gave money to HunterKing's Summer when she married Austin? Or he gave Summer the condo?    There was a convoluted side plot about someone needing money and something from this was drawn in a shady way.  Something about it being sold?  And then when GinaT's Phyllis awoke from her coma, she had no condo to come back to.
    • Which union rules? SMH. Jill’s back, uncredited. 
    • Yeah I don’t get why she wouldn’t be credited if she’s back. That seems odd. I hope it’s true though, because the show needs a change. Badddddd.
    • The casino scenes came out of nowhere in comparison to the rest of the week, but at least there was some movement in the storyline. Joey has really made a fool of Vanessa. Chelsea is really embarrassing herself with this doctor. The desperation is so obvious and she clearly gets that from Dani. Hayley was giving Donna Logan vibes because that is how Donna acted when Eric had a heart attack. Stealing potential evidence is not going to reflect well on Kat and might throw the case against Leslie. Tomas had no business in Eva's hotel room even if he did shut down her advances. But I think they still might end up together at some point because the book that Eva gave him is the same one Kat called basic which seemed like foreshadowing.
    • So Sharon decides not to go to France and stay behind to support Mariah, but now with Phyllis gloating about getting an invite I’m sure she’ll change her mind.    Mariah’s secret is that she screwed that old man? I’m so confused about what’s going on here, and Mariah coming out and telling Tessa that she can’t know her secret is supposed to do what exactly? Is that supposed to put Tessa’s mind at ease? Lol…. I’m getting Cameron Kirsten vibes though. Did he do something to her without her consent and things went too far? These writers really can’t come up with something original if their life depended on it 
    • Eve and Thomas have so much in common--they both like reading (print and audio books) and wow they both like reading *fiction*!  (Also I would never pick up a book called Mercy and Goodness yawn

      Please register in order to view this content

      )
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy