December 22, 20169 yr Author Member 28 minutes ago, rlj said: You mean like the Shick reunions, like Joshua said Shick like an old sweater your grandpa wears, and when there no story they can reunite LOL I LOVE IT, i make a post bout Chick and out come the undercover Shickies, waiting for Becki LOL Ha! I take equal joy in all nick's failures. He's not the queen maker this show thinks he is. And for the record, I've never liked Shick or Sharon. List of things you won't ever catch me doing: . . . 124. Stanning for Sharon.
December 22, 20169 yr Member 12 minutes ago, Vee said: Don't bother arguing with fanatics. Thanks, i dont think they r fanatics, they just REALLY LOVE Sharon!
December 22, 20169 yr Author Member 24 minutes ago, ryanc said: Well hold up now don't call me an "undercover Shickie" because I am more than willing to accept a new love interest for Nick but it just so happens that every one he's had besides Sharon has flopped for me. I am/was a Shick fan but that doesn't mean I'm exclusive to that one pairing. I wish the show would give Nick a new romance that I can enjoy but so far that hasn't happened yet. I was just saying on another message board that I think JM and Arianne Zucker would have great chemistry. Of course I would attribute that more to AZ having chemistry with just about anyone, not because I think JM is a great actor, cause he's not. Also JM said working with SC again was like putting on a "comfy sweater". To me, that means it's comfortable to work with her. The dialogue flows easily between them because they've worked together for years. I'm not about to get into another Shick/Phick/Nage/Navery/etc etc debate with you again because it's obvious you thrive on that sort of thing. I haven't seen much commentary from you outside of anything regarding hating Sharon and loving Nicks new flavour of the week, but I'll just say this. We'll wait and see in a year from now if 'Chick' was able to have the same staying power that Shick has had for several years. The pairings didn't just flop for you. They flopped for majority hence none of them were continued
December 22, 20169 yr Member 24 minutes ago, rlj said: LOL Sharon aint on the cover, she aint mentioned in the ärtivle, SSM broke em up and touted Phick as her IT couple in 06, hence y she says they r goin in different direction now, she aint a fan. of Shick, i, they aint in 'lay, Chick is! English please?
December 22, 20169 yr Member 45 minutes ago, ryanc said: Well hold up now don't call me an "undercover Shickie" because I am more than willing to accept a new love interest for Nick but it just so happens that every one he's had besides Sharon has flopped for me. I am/was a Shick fan but that doesn't mean I'm exclusive to that one pairing. I wish the show would give Nick a new romance that I can enjoy but so far that hasn't happened yet. I was just saying on another message board that I think JM and Arianne Zucker would have great chemistry. Of course I would attribute that more to AZ having chemistry with just about anyone, not because I think JM is a great actor, cause he's not. Also JM said working with SC again was like putting on a "comfy sweater". To me, that means it's comfortable to work with her. The dialogue flows easily between them because they've worked together for years. I'm not about to get into another Shick/Phick/Nage/Navery/etc etc debate with you again because it's obvious you thrive on that sort of thing. I haven't seen much commentary from you outside of anything regarding hating Sharon and loving Nicks new flavour of the week, but I'll just say this. We'll wait and see in a year from now if 'Chick' was able to have the same staying power that Shick has had for several years. i have the quote, as well as many others, read below, lets not go there i didnt say ish bout Sharon when i posted in this thread initialy, You tld me in 2015, to wait a year, now u telling me to wait another, uh ok LOL 16 minutes ago, ryanc said: English please? They ain't in play, LOL
December 22, 20169 yr Member 3 hours ago, rlj said: Thanks, i dont think they r fanatics, they just REALLY LOVE Sharon! *are And we don't "Really Love" Sharon, we just aren't obsessed with these characters like you are and feeling the need to stan for literally any loser (i.e., Sage) like it's some kind of weird war. I've barely watched Y&R over the years. I happen to love Gina's Phyllis and I like Sharon. I don't care about Nick with either one. It's called just watching the show.
December 22, 20169 yr Member 9 hours ago, Vee said: *are And we don't "Really Love" Sharon, we just aren't obsessed with these characters like you are and feeling the need to stan for literally any loser (i.e., Sage) like it's some kind of weird war. I've barely watched Y&R over the years. I happen to love Gina's Phyllis and I like Sharon. I don't care about Nick with either one. It's called just watching the show. Whaaaat heavens to betsy, posting in YR discussion threads talkin bout my favs, least favs, couplings playing on my screen, oooooh de obsession Here i am in this thread talkin bout my fav and a potential pairing, ooooooh de obsession Dont like my posts, hit de ignore, i'll be like "too bad, so sad, , i aint mad"; otherwise GMAFB Happy Holidays:
December 22, 20169 yr Member LMAO. at u (pun intendéd) Anywho the following week, SOD says Nick is recuperating from a WILD NYE, interesting
December 22, 20169 yr Member Yep, as it seems some r with me LOL its been like 3 months since Adam died and Chelsea might get her freak on
December 22, 20169 yr Member No one's obsessed with you. It's just you don't apply logic to watching the show.
December 22, 20169 yr Member @KMan101 I've had rlj on ignore since that cow used to post here and pick fights. Like you said about you know who, try your best to Otherwise it's drinking the Nick Newman Kool Aid from then on...
December 22, 20169 yr Member 49 minutes ago, slick jones said: @KMan101 I've had rlj on ignore since that cow used to post here and pick fights. Like you said about you know who, try your best to Otherwise it's drinking the Nick Newman Kool Aid from then on... Yeah, that one has become obvious, right down to the spelling mistakes
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.