Jump to content

Showtime: Masters of Sex


EricMontreal22

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Out of the current new shows? Yes I would.

I really love the New Yorker's recent TV critic Emily Nussbaum (she wrote a great retort to the NYTimes who went on about how Game of Thrones wouldn't appeal to any female) and this is her take, which pretty much matches up with mine--the complaints and all. Read it and decide for yourself http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/television/2013/10/07/131007crte_television_nussbaum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And while I don't trust the majority of TV critics (and I admit, the old TV critic at the NewYorker was a particular snob) it has a very high meta score. http://www.metacritic.com/tv/masters-of-sex 85% positive Like Emily says it seems to straddle the titillating True Blood style cable dramas and the more chaste Six Feet Under ones (if those can be called chaste.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I liked the pilot a lot, but lost interest in the second episode. The show just seems so... redundant (for lack of a better word). It's like "oooh, we're talking about sex when it was taboo" and it's like, who cares?

Lizzy Caplan is the standout actress and character. Everybody else seems so cartoony and one-dimensional. It is well produced though.

Maybe I should give it another chance, but I reckon I would still be bored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I know zilch about comics but I know what you mean - it's always annoying when they screw up the authenticity of a period setting , even with something minor.

I didn't watch last night but someone told me that it is turning into a semi-procedural with a medical case of a week. So not going to give this a second chance then - if I wanted such nonsense, I'd guzzle down whatever rubbish CBS is serving up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought it was ok. I've only watched the first episode. I'm interested in Johnson enough to watch another episode. I take it that it really is Master's wife who is infertile? I just can't believe he would put her through all these procedures if he had a low sperm count.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I haven't seen anymore epsiodes but your Six Feet Under comparison sounds about right from what I could make out from just 2 episodes. I guess calling it a semi-procedural is exaggerated then.

Glad you enjoying it though. I concur with the earlier comments that it isn't a very good year of freshmen shows, and this extends to non-broadcast as well surprisinglyt (for me).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks for searching through everything. Worked on them so long, just too lazy to check for those links myself, so I am glad you chose to do it! I guess I never did type out anything for 1973-1977 in regards to the preemptions, but they are on the charts at least (and this far back, they don't seem to do any of those "breakouts" anymore, so things are simpler in the 1970's, so eventually I could type those out). 
    • I dump on the Y&R sets problem all the time, but BOLD is no better -- and they're not even introducing new sets. All of their sets are years old, and very few look like they're inhabited by people with money. Is that going to change with this move? I'd rather they save the money spent on another remote, which is no better than an HGTV travelogue, and get some new/better sets.
    • The donut posts here make up for a Friday show that was barely meh. Aside from seeing Anna, I really didn't care much about anything else. While I understand the thought behind breaking up all the sadness with "other scenes," I'd rather they moved right to John's funeral. Instead of hearing a stupid story about John changing some minor character's tire 20 years ago, just move on to the crying. I also thought the Chad and Cat scenes were a waste. I realize not everyone is devastated by John's death to the point of not functioning, but going sky diving is a choice. By the way, Jack and Jennifer are giving me nothing on this return. Please leave asap. DAYS did such a great job with John's death, so ending the week this way was a letdown.
    • Add Dr. Montgomery to list of fine women on this show! I hope the show goes forward with Madison/Chelsea and then once they're developed, bring back Allison, who is now divorced or a widow, for a Madison/Chelsea/Allison triangle.  It would definitely be the hottest triangle in daytime.  
    • I wonder if Linda Bloodworth-Thomason had Kim in mind for any of her other characters/series. If they intended Allison Sugarbaker (Julia Duffy's character) to be more in line with who Suzanne was/Delta Burke's portrayal-persona, then I think Kim would have aced that. Yes, it would have been odd, Kim having previously played a different character (from a different family), but Designing Women wouldn't have been the first show with that issue. Or maybe Kim could have played Beth Broderick's role on Hearts Afire. Or Patricia Heaton's role on Women of the House.
    • Sony is probably waiting until Y&R’s lease is up as well. All of TV City is going to be gutted, so they have to relocate at some point. 
    • At this point Y&R's next step is to go fully green screen and have the actors Zoom from home.
    • I was just taking about this in the Y&R thread - they desperately need better studio space. 
    • Errol posted that Ed Scott retired  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy