Jump to content

British soaps - has the bubble burst?


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The article feels five years out of date, at least, and is poorly written (relying on Corrie actor scandals but not having the guts to talk about anything beyond a silly product plugging scam...ignoring that Corrie had huge, huge offcamera problems in the early 80s similar to some of what is going on today...citing one of those joke Daily Mail articles that Mail/Mirror/Daily Star/etc. come out with every time Corrie gets a new producer), but you might enjoy it.

The main part I agree with is some British soaps in the 80s told complex stories that pap like Mad Men now gets credit for.

http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2013/oct/01/soap-operas-has-the-bubble-burst

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I do think the heart of what the article is about is true. The soaps have lost their social relevance, and they aren't telling modern stories with modern characters. They are following in the US soaps footsteps: slowly losing what they once were, relying on the young demographic to pull in ratings, telling more sensational and OTT storylines, relying heavily on ratings, etc. It's the classic tale of not knowing how to be modern, while trying to be modern, but not really wanting to change.

They should be creating characters that feel real, have them doing stuff that is reflective of today's society, telling socially relevant stories. Instead, they rely on the same old character types and the same old themes of murder and adultery to push them along.

You could say the article is 5 years too late, but we all know why it was churned out now - b/c EE has been haemorrhaging viewers, and that has gotten some people's attention.

Besides, no-one really wants to listen. People said the same things when a variant of this article did rounds about the US soaps 10 years ago. "They aren't dying, yet." "They are still strong." " I can't see [insert soap here] going anywhere any time soon." etc. Now the US is down to 4 soaps and 2 online languishing in purgatory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Soaps always need to adapt and change with the times. If anything, the English soaps suffer from erring on the side of too "old and irrelevant" (with all that implies) for today's audiences, similar to what US soaps suffered from during the last decade. More 90210, less Golden Girls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's harder for EE etc to try and modernize, as everytime they've tried to focus storys on younger cast they get complaints. " EE has to many teens" etc As the older viewers seem to just want adults getting screentime. It's tough as they need to bring in new viewers (ED & Corrie aswell) but also dont want to alienate & lose the current viewers. HO is a great modern Soap yet even when it's got great storylines/acting it still has fairly low viewers. imo spoilers have played a big part in viewers numbers coming down, as if you know something big is going to happen you'll probably watch ( as shown by eps like that viewers are usually high) whereas a normal ep people think 'well nothing big is happening i'll miss this ep' I also think watching online on iplayer/itv player/4od not to mention the repeats on BBC3/ITV2/E4 play a part. As instead of say 10 million for Corrie 7.30 ITV1, its split between that showing,the ITV2 repeats & the online player

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Members

UK Soaps are going no where. ITV Ratings & BBC Ratings for the week ending October 13, 2013.

BBC (000's)

1 STRICTLY COME DANCING (SAT 1829) 10,899
2 STRICTLY COME DANCING: THE RESULTS (SUN 1920) 8,952
3 EASTENDERS (MON 2000) 7,824
4 EASTENDERS (THU 1929) 7,373
5 COUNTRYFILE (SUN 1819) 6,782
6 EASTENDERS (FRI 2000) 6,390
7 ATLANTIS (SAT 2031) 6,241
8 ANTIQUES ROADSHOW (SUN 1959) 5,534
9 EASTENDERS (TUE 1929) 5,421
10 CASUALTY (SAT 2127) 5,030
ITV
ITV (was ITV1)
w/e 13 Oct 2013
000's
1 DOWNTON ABBEY (SUN 2103) 9,922
2 CORONATION STREET (MON 1933) 9,031
3 THE X FACTOR RESULTS (SUN 1959) 8,791
4 CORONATION STREET (MON 2030) 8,783
5 CORONATION STREET (WED 1932) 8,343
6 DOC MARTIN (MON 2100) 7,971
7 CORONATION STREET (SUN 1859) 7,741
8 THE X FACTOR (SAT 1959) 7,720
9 EMMERDALE (MON 1902) 7,053
10 EMMERDALE (FRI 1901) 7,022
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Yeh, HO usually gets about 1.13 Million viewers lately, which is good compared to the recent past in that they're actually in the Top 30 C4 shows, but nowhere near the heights they reached 6-7 years ago.

Also, those ratings for EE are alarmingly low. Last year they were typically far and away the #1 show on BBC, with around 9-10 Million per episode. Now they're bottoming out at 5.4? Scary, though hopefully temporary as the Michael Moon murder scenes were fantastic (though there's shades of Den's murder being retreaded in the story that follows, I still think it'll get the ratings up).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
    • OMG...Robert Mandan! And Donna Mills is a child. I keep hoping for more of early Ross/Vanessa.
    • I get your point, but I also know that if the roles were reversed -- if a man were screwing around on a woman this way -- everyone would be all "All with his head!" When I say Vanessa needs therapy, I'm actually being kind, because I could begin and end with the fact that she's a cheating slut.
    • Is nobody going to mention the cringefest that is 'Carl Ivati'?
    • I've accepted we'll probably never see any of the Roger/Holly 1976-1978 storyline. Whenever any of Roger/Holly 1979 and 1980 storylines surface, those are must watch as they set in motion everything we saw a decade later.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy