Jump to content

OLTL: Thursday, May 23, 2013 Episode Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

GH had the rights to John Starr Todd Tea Blair Hope & Cole but not Natalie. Cartini made it sound like it was cause of MA's contract with PP but GH but the lawsuitt showed that as false. Maybe SBH & TR was like forget what GH wrote, re Nat. It never happened

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel that if PP had worked a new deal with Ted King. OLTL would have forgotten that GH sent Tomas on a case for the CIA and that he could be Alcazar. However when Ted didnt sign on, maybe OLTL thought well GH gave us an out for Tomas. Let's use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lol. I was confused in the last many years why Natalie was EVER hung up on John. Why anyone was EVER hung up on John. But I accepted that she was. And that he was the "love of her life". Melissa keeps referring to Natalie losing the love of her life in interviews and they've promoted that relationship as such and continue to do so. So I just accept it.

I loved Natalie's phone conversation with Viki. Those two have such a lovely genuine mother/daughter vibe. I enjoy the humor in the writing so much. It's so much more sophisticated than Ron's vaudeville style (I always expect to hear the ba da dum drum beat after Ron's punch lines).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Who wrote Wednesday's show? Alex Douglas? There were some funny [!@#$%^&*] lines and larger exchanges. The whole Jack/Todd exchange about Victor has been mentioned, but I also liked Todd talking about Victor's left strangling hand was much more powerful than his right. Also, Cutter and Natalie are still adorable. All their banter was great. "Give the lady anything she wants...five dollar limit."

I loved that they went so far as to give us Viki and Destiny, and longer scenes with B&N and Des and Drew, then Clint and Jeffrey, who is so competent, so capable and so cool. There's just a real sense of building community that works so well for this show. And sorry not sorry, Matthew and Dani are still incredibly hot. That stuff was great, especially the opening.

I absolutely adore the Banner story because no one is entirely right or wrong and everyone has a point. Clint and Jeffrey are right about the paper, but their methods and approach need work. Jeffrey is young and brash and doesn't realize when he oversteps - he clearly deeply admires Viki but needs to get paid, and is increasingly impatient with her dragging her feet - and Viki is too traditional and overprotective, as well as fearful for her position and perhaps just a little bit "Lord of the Banner" in how she regards Jeffrey. The level of industry detail in what they talk about, and the fact that all their interplay is so mature and layered is really fascinating stuff, way ahead of anything on network soaps right now. I just really hope that this story doesn't wink out with the existing HWs gone. Hopefully not, since they're promoting from within.

I thought Andrew Trischitta was fine. He keeps improving - the Manning stuff was good and I just love that set. I just hope they start getting to the meat of that stuff in the next several weeks. Also, Jesus, Bruce (Ryan Cooper) is hot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Would be excited if Jack really is vegan and not just refusing Todd's food! That would be the kind of representation of real stuff and real people that has been missing from soaps.

I don't understand, when did Bruce become Australian? Or was that just him putting on an accent like I sometimes do? If the latter, it needed to be explained better.

They randomly aged Drew in between last week and this week.

Natalie forgetting at first that she just rescheduled her date with Cutter 20 minutes ago was weird and seems like an example of the bad continuity that plagues the show, particularly on days written by Alex Douglas.

Yay for Destiny really working at the Banner and apparently not having the story from the audition script. She needs to find time to sleep though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think it was bad continuity at all. She forgot and remembered like any of us would anything in the course of a normal, slightly goofy conversation. There's times I forget where things are while I'm holding them in my hands.

Bruce was always Australian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How do you explain Natalie acting like she and Cutter hadn't already set a date for Sunday and acting like Viki had to convince her to set a new date then? When one has to go to great lengths to explain what is really happening in a scene, and given the history of how this show has been shooting out of order with numerous continuity issues -- if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it probably is a duck.

Thanks for explaining about Bruce. I guess the accent was not as noticeable to me before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Or, just maybe, someone wasn't clearly paying attention to the dialogue in which Natalie thinks to herself that she's free on Sunday, then realizes that oops, no, I'm not, we rescheduled - a scene which was all in one, not pieced together, and a deliberate parallel to the scene in which Cutter said almost the exact same thing to her before realizing he was busy with work on Thursday earlier in the exact same episode - then maybe, just maybe, you're not quite as all-knowing as you think you are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're the one who seems to have forgotten Cutter and Natalie already rescheduled for Sunday. Viki doesn't have to tell Natalie to reschedule because Natalie and Cutter already rescheduled!

I already know that Natalie "remembers" in the scene that she's not busy on Thursday after all. That's why I wrote "forgetting at first." But that doesn't explain why Natalie says the date was "cancelled" and why Viki says it has to be "rescheduled" -- it is already rescheduled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're not paying attention. Viki only reinforces what was already discussed by Natalie and Cutter. Natalie mentions it to her in order to reinforce the beat that Natalie is gunshy about trying again with someone new after John, looking for an excuse to shy away from the risk - and Viki is there to tell her to press forward and go ahead with the date. No one in the scene says anything about her not having already rescheduled; Viki doesn't know Cutter and Natalie have already discussed it, all she knows is Natalie is worried about being hurt again and needs a push. That is the point of the scene. So it has nothing to do with the continuity, it has to do with a character beat. You're so eager to believe it's about continuity issues and these shows according to your perspective that you're not actually allowing the show as it happens to intrude on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Phew, that was close to disaster!

      Please register in order to view this content

      I suspect we would have had a few withdrawals next year if Israel had won. I don't think many people would relish going to Jerusalem as things stand now. Not to mention it would have been a prime target for terrorist attacks.   
    • And they've given us plenty. Sets, outdoor scenes, music licensing, etc. And that was the point of me using DAYS... so. It's obvious the casino set is not intended for long-term use, hence why it's likely it wasn't as evolved as the other community sets, etc.
    • Enjoy Errol!  Your guy! Teehee @Errol  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I just had thought of how to save the Perkins family. (Inspired by Rituals) -- What if Marisa Perkins was Augusta Lockridge's sister? Fictionally, they could've both been local girls, one married rich and one married poor. Originally, I was going to suggest that Marisa be Sophia's sister, but then I realized Joe and Kelly would've been first cousins.  Of course, it would've truly inspired Sophia was if Rosa Andrade sister, with Rosa and Santana moving in to help CC raise the kids once Sophia disappeared.  While this could've avoided both gross CC and Santana affairs, the times were not right for a story about intersectional inequity.
    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJxW5DLJLId/ Another World is my forever favorite soap opera. But it's finale is almost universally hated by its fans. What this is, is an edit where I've deleted everything I didn't like!!!
    • The Perkins family had potential to be a nice alternative to the more dysfunctional Capwells and wackier Lockridges... but I think a few factors did in the family. 1) Recasting of Joe Perkins 2) Bad casting of the Perkins Patriarch, and the one note writing for that character. 3) Lack of antagonistic interaction between the Capwells/Lockridges and Perkins.  (There was no awkwardness between Jade/Ted.. or CC disapproving of his son being friends with that Perkins girl, etc). 4) Wasting of Jade thus wasting the potential of the actress (which was realized on Days of Our Lives).  She had more potential than Laken oddly enough. The only member of the Perkins family that had appeal and a somewhat thought out story arc was Amy.  
    • @GymnastGuyThanks for posting the three new Capitol 1985 episodes today. The two labeled March 12, and 13 are misidentified. The March 12 labeled one actually aired November 12 1985 which I figured out because Kenny Rogers' movie Wild Horses aired November 12th and it was announced over the "March 12" Cap credits. In addition, Craig Carlson is listed in the April credits but not the March. Craig left Capitol sometime after July 1985 before he rejoined OLTL in the credits by October 15, 1985; he was replaced on Cap by Radcliffe and Hamner. In these posted episodes Radcliffe/Hamner names appear in the March 85 episodes but not in the April.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy