Jump to content

The Young and The Restless Shocker: - Actress Leaving


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

What irks me up EB, MTS, etc.'s overt resentment of the "newbies." Every one of their asses were new at some point. Yet, their egos are so damn big that they cannot share the airtime with the new actors. It is like they live in a delusional world where they think that they are the Highlander who will stay young, beautiful, and live forever.

  • Replies 533
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

I blame the writing as much as I blame MS. Sorry to see her go, but I won't miss the character as the writing was atrocious for last few years,

  • Members
Posted

To be honest, you might as well blame the fans as well. Fans keep saying "we want vets," not "we want newbies;" the show should establish a healthy medium. I for one am happy to see Tracey Bregman front and center again though.

Then the show might as well cancel itself. Y&R thrives on its recognizable faces. With Jeanne gone, Walton reoccurring, and Stafford leaving; they aren't really doing a good job setting up the next generation.

  • Members
Posted

RME. Absolute rubbish. I am so tired of this false mantra that these soaps will collapse if the vets leave. It never happens. BTW, I think that Y&R has a good younger generation. They are just not being utilized well. In part, because they are not getting enough airtime. Getting rid of a whole slew of vets would be a good thing for Y&R.

  • Members
Posted

I'm surprised at DD's comments since it feels like he's been on much more in the past few months than he was on for years. I mean his offscreen love interest sucks but at least I know that's his love interest. I couldn't figure out for a long time what was going on between Paul and Nina.

  • Members
Posted

DD is the perfect example. I adored Paul in his prime. He was a great character. He had a crazy hot body and was sexy as hell. But WTH is he still doing on the canvas? Successive regimes have found barely anything for him to do for years. He should been fired, not Thad Luckinbill who was the younger and had more story potential with stronger ties to the canvas as the father of a Newman and Chancellor. J.T. should be the younger generation PI/police detective in a romance with Colleen, the next generation Abbott.

No actor is owed a job forever. These vets are rightly being transitioned into supporting roles of their children. Yes, they can have romances, but the focus of the show should be on featuring the next generation. It really irks me that Noah is doing absolutely nothing, while his parents are having sex with everything that walks.

  • Members
Posted

I agree there should be a shifting of focus to the younger generation, but the younger generation has to have actors that can act.. and have good writing to back up the actors.

I'm not seeing either of those factors, hence why people are crying out for the veterans.

  • Members
Posted

To me an actor should stay if they keep their talent, charisma, and chemistry with other actors, so I would have kept DD (I would have had him as a mentor to JT).

It's people like Bergman or Morrow or Rikkart I don't see the point of now. Dead-end characters played by actors who just do nothing for me at this point. Jack used to be one of my favorite characters and now all I see is a crying, weak man who has proposed to everyone but his sisters.

  • Members
Posted

The real question is which actors can produce chemistry, produce story, deliver story, carry any scene or story even when it sucks. There's this whole prefab idea of who should stay around. ____ should stay around...because. Why? Just because. That's it.

Let's take Victoria, a character mostly getting by based on her strength somewhere in 2000. Why is she there? Why is Billy there? Why are Chloe and Kevin there? Why is Cane there? What do they offer?

  • Members
Posted

J.T. had long past needing Paul as a mentor and he could have turned to any of the older males as a confidant. If anyone should have left, it should have been DD so for him to complain about airtime when he is lucky to still be employed is ridiculous.

Jack and Nick are not dead-end characters. They both have younger relatives and family on the canvas. They should be transitioning into patriarchs. Jack needs to have more scenes with his nephew, niece, and brother. Morrow should be parenting his children, not spending most of his life drooling over Avery.

Rikaart is a different story all together. Kevin should have never been brought back and I have no idea how he has lasted this long. He should have been long gone along with DD.

  • Members
Posted

I completely agree. A lot of the vets who are fan favorites are nothing special in the acting department. There will always been strong and weak actors in every group. EB has never been able to act. Same with JM.

  • Members
Posted

I don't think JT would have worked well with most of the older males. In a lot of ways JT was a young Paul.

I have no real interest in whose relatives are on the canvas because I think most of the family interactions on Y&R are poorly written and have been for a long time. Y&R spent so many years having various Abbotts tell Jack what a loser he was that it is pretty much all I see now. The Newmans mostly ended up being crushed under Victor's foot. To me, Nick mostly seems like a dumbass, Jack mostly seems weak and ineffective, and this has taken over most of their scenes. There's no fire, no life. I can't invest in them now because I feel like this is what they will always have, no matter who they're with.

I think Y&R's best bet is to weed out dead spots and stale characters regardless of their ties to the show, although I know they likely never will, especially if the characters are men.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
    • It's interesting to watch this having watched The Doctors. I'm not sure I'm seeing that much of a difference in the characters Gerald Gordon and Anna Stuart played on The Doctors and what they're playing here.
    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I spent years hoping we would get an oral history like the OLTL book, but it’s too late now with so many having passed away.
    • It’s also strange that it was Monica! I just don’t think of her as the staring off into space type of woman! I watched a bunch of other clips and stuff from random 1978 and 1979 episodes. I’m so used to seeing movement from Monty’s era, especially the early part, that this really is a cool relic. Pretty soon you have scenes start at the new nurses station, the elevators opening and doctors walking to the desk to get their messages from Jessie or Bobbie. People often walk towards doors while taking coats on or off, many Webber house scenes start or end with someone walking up the stairs. This episode is even more static than some of the way earlier ones I have seen, where you would have Steve or Jessie at least going from the old school nurses desk to the medicine room, Steve’s office, etc. That bland dialogue is very much like what they have now. The show picks up a lot of personality. Knowing what we know about David Hamilton and how that really started to get the ball rolling as far as viewers you really see just how vital Lesley and especially Laura were to get things moving for them. They focused on the right characters to get fast results. The show now could learn a thing or two from this.
    • It won't allow me to watch it via the link; I am only able to watch it with the app.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy