Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of January


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I still think Trey (despite seeming too old--he's a year older than me I realized--) actually to my surprise showed a lot of attention. This seems a waste. At the least, if they wanted to make his death really hard on Conniue and sorta humanize her (...) as they seem to want to, t would have meant more if they hadn't rushed this story as they often do and we had seen some scenes of them starting to understand or like each other. Instead we got 1/8th of a scene like that and then bam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It does to me since I never once bought that Trey was truly in love with Krustina or trusted in her enough to share his inner feelings. I did, however, believe that there was a connection that could've developed into a love-hate attraction between him and Starr.

*sigh*

I should thank my lucky stars that he wasn't Eli'd by being made responsible for everything from 9/11 to Hurricane Sandy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Which is why I never saw him as GH's answer to The Rapist Robert Ford. Both EV and Ron actually made me believe that Trey was a sympathetic character in a way that I never did with that blight on OLTL's final years.

I'd like to think that Ron learned his lesson on how to redeem a character from their shady beginnings, but I'm not completely sold on this being more than a fluke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't say that they had to ignore it altogether - just simply revisit it at a later date.

I'm right with you about Minnie Mouse Maxie and Jar Jar Binks still funking up the canvas even though I've been lucky enough to barely see her - so far. Jar Jar, on the other hand, is a wet fart that always manages to worm his way into scenes with characters that I tune in to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh I totally agree. I think it was just that when he was introduced it DID seem a lot like reality TV producer Ford 2.0--you can't blame people at that point for thinking as much (and maybe he was meant to be more Ford-like, wouldn't be too surprised), but I quite quickly grew into him and for whatever reason (better acting? better writing? the fact he didn't bed vulnerable women and students?) the fact that we find out he comes from a horrible father in both cases. But anyway I grew to quite like the character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow, Maxie is a foul bitch. Was she really gonna let Dante and Lulu know that their baby is dead via email?

My god Ellie is dense. Spinelli cheated on you, nitwit

Oh wow, Anna and Duke arent dead. I feel as if these scenes should have happened 3 weeks ago

Britt has beautiful eyes

Kudos to Laura Wright. She did amazing work today. Carly and Todd have been a surprising bright spot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
    • I'm pretty sure he was. But point taken. GL really had a thing for masked and costumed balls/parties in the '80's. Everyone looks fabulous, but those poor costume designers.
    • Still here ^^ Come on Prime Video, it's due to bring it back!
    • Got through the eighth season, and it was... painful. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree 100% with both you and Mitch64.  Soaps have been going further and further off-course since 1981. TPTB just don't have a fundamental understanding of what makes soap fans so loyal. I'd love to be on a writing team with both of you.  Maybe we could put together a real soap opera, and show people what its all about...  
    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. Yeah, she knew OF him, but there's that phenomenon called cognetive dissonance. If you see someone outside of an expected situation, you probably won't recognize them, especially if you never met them in person and think they're dead. I bet a CIA spook like Roger would be familiar with that concept. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy