Members Jonathan Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 Attention everyone. Eric is on a reply streak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members EricMontreal22 Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 Agreed to all of this. The last few years people complained (rightly) that AMC was littered with children who were too young to have storylines. It makes sense to age some of the characters we have seen recently inthe past years to make them viable, instead of just bring on brand new characters. Me too. Add in Brooke in some capacity, and cast wise I'm sold, for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members marceline Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 I'd rather have Eric's reply streak over post after post after post from haters and hysterics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members rhinohide Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 I swear. The Teen Demo never topped 100,000 viewers. Any increase or decrease in that demo never affected overall ratings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members EricMontreal22 Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 LOL I had 24 hours to catch up on I think I'm done for now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members KMan101 Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 And with the time jump, if we want to go by "real time" the show's been off the air for 16-17 months, right? By the time it comes back in the "Spring" it will be another couple of months, so the time jump isn't a huge stretch and would have likely happened anyway, they're just increasing it a couple of years. Now if it's 5 years PLUS the 2 that the show was off, yeah, that's kinda big but you know what, after a few weeks I'm sure no one will give it a second thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members EricMontreal22 Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 Aww thanks Marceline. Honestly, I think you're right. That said it was pointed out as being a reason for the show being more viable... I still think somewhere down the line doing a gay storyline would be beneficial--just since--even at their worst quality wise, there seemed to be fairly big online (youtube, etc) interest in gay storylines in the past few years by people who otherwise were not aware of the soaps... I still wanna hear about viewership issues in Canada. Soaps move in such strange time lapses anyway, I really don't see the big deal. (Meaning a day can last a week--or three months if it's a JER soap and then suddenly they're celebrating July the 4th when we are). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members rhinohide Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 I think Marceline is right. As long as they don't make a point of explaining that it's been five years and try to fill in the gaps too much, the audience will make the leap. I've seen people complaining that what happens when Skye traverses from one soap to the other. How do they explain that time passed on one soap but not the other. So what? How much has that really happened? Are we going to let Skye's existence limit the creative process on all three soaps? I don't think so. Speaking of all the negativity about the websoaps, has anyone seen an interview with either Spacey or Robin Wright about why they chose to do the webseries House of Cards? Were they well paid? What was the inducement for those name stars to do something so secondary? Neither has done a television series as far as I know. So I'm very curious why they would do this. Since it's such a secondary prospect relative to TV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Wizzerkat Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 I don't mind a good teen scene as long as they don't eat the show like Zendall did. Even though I am not thrilled about a potential 5 year jump, one good potential thing about it is bringing in NEW viewers. If you use history but don't over use it at least to start, people could feel they can start watching the show online without thinking they need some big history lesson first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 It's not secondary when it's a big-budget series on Netflix in a much-hyped new digital medium, produced by David Fincher and remade from a classic UK series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Jonathan Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 House of Cards isn't really a web series. It was first a UK series on BBC and then Netflix picked up the rights to produce a US version which is now offered to its subscribers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members rhinohide Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 It is an entirely new production, remake or not, available only through Netflix. Web based. It is original programming for many American viewers. My question remains. What made Kevin Spacey and Dabney Coleman and Robin Wright, among many others, take the leap to appear on any production that would only be available through Netflix. Online. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Mr. Vixen Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 The thing with the time jump is, they can mention it up front, establish the characters lives, then never mention it again. As long as they don't mention a specific year, it's not a big deal and doesn't prevent OLTL crossovers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Jonathan Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 Because Netflix is fast becoming the new HBO, a destination for reputable Hollywood actors to sink their teeth into some good material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members rhinohide Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 Bingo! And where does Hulu fit in? Why are they carrying new programming from Prospect Park? Anybody ever heard of a "flanking" attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.