Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted (edited)

The twins' relationship kind of irked me as until the first swimming scene I thought they were a couple. blink.png But both were very attractive and likable.

I love that Hilda had to hop the fence with Bill turned away.

However, the beginning narration was an odd choice. I guess they were still in the radio mindset.

Edited by Bright Eyes
  • Members
Posted

I know what you mean about the twins. The lady was Eva Marie Saint.

I loved the feel of this episode - a lazy family outing, yet with real life problems still under the surface. It just felt so natural.

I had to laugh when they were called "the best dressed" show on TV. I don't know what that is supposed to mean.

  • Members
Posted

Thanks to Carl and Bright Eyes for watching. Sometimes I feel no one will watch some of the material I upload. It is nice to know that it is viewed and appreciated.

Carl, I believe that the "best dressed show' originated from the fact that many early programs required actors to wear their own clothes. One Man's Family was one of the first to have its wardrobe provided by a boutique. In this case, Lord and Taylor exclusively dressed the cast.

  • Members
Posted

I wondered what that was about. It was just kind of ironic considering the way the characters were dressed.

The show seems a lot different than most of the other soaps I've seen from this time period. They would probably say, "We're a family drama."

It's too bad more isn't written about the show's success and why it didn't last on TV.

Was Eva Marie Saint there for the entire TV run?

  • 7 months later...
  • 2 years later...
  • Members
Posted

Going through down memory lane on old posts here in cancelled soaps now that I have access again to an old computer makes it more fun. 

 

I've used Matt P. Smith's Soap Opera History write-ups for other soaps both short-lived and long-lived but noticed I hadn't shared one for this soap: 

 

  • Members
Posted

I'd believe it given some local channels have often aired forgotten public domain from the early 50's for years (see "I Married Joan" or "My Little Margie" as the best examples). 

  • 4 years later...
  • Members
Posted

An episode I don't think I've seen floating around. 

 

Please register in order to view this content

 

This one has been around for a while, in various places.

 

 

  • 6 months later...
  • 1 year later...
  • 3 months later...
  • Members
Posted

This review is of the primetime version. 

Detroit Free Press Detroit, Michigan 28 Mar 1950,

Watch Out, Hazel! He's Up To No Good

As radio .serials go, "One Man's Family" is as quiet as a country churchyard. That is to say the Barbour family, whose lives have ljeen chronicled in "One Man's Family" for 18 long years, is less than ordinarily afflicted by murder, disease, bankruptcy, embezzlement, illegitimate children, lnsanity, illicit passion, and insanity the normal lot of  most soap-opera families.  But soap-opera standards are rather different from any other standards. The fact that the Barbours are less lurid than other radio serial families doesn't mean that nothing ever HAPPENS to them.

Let's see now: Clifford Barbour has lost two wives one in childbirth, another in an automotive accident, Claudia nad Hazel Barbour have had a couple or husbands apiece. I'm rather confused about Hazel it's not easy to keep her matrimonial affairs straight here but I think Hazel is now on her way to a third husband or a Fate Worse Than Death. (Matters were still up in the air when I left Hazel last week.) CLAUDIA'S first husband, who was Joan's father, died of pneumonia. Hazel's first husband was an amnesia victim of the first World War and died years ago. During the Second World War, Claudia and her second husband, Nicholas, and their two youngest children were torpedoed at sea. They were picked up by a German submarine and landed in a concentration camp where their youngest child died. So, you see, life isn't precisely torpid around the Barbour household.

Last fall, "One Man's Family" Father and Mother Barbour, and Paul, Hazel, Claudia, Clifford and Jack, started existence reasonably afresh on television. I'll bring you up to date on Claudia and Hazel, but you'll have to do your own research on the rest of the mob. I haven't space. ' . CLAUDIA NOW has a new husband named Johnny, who finds the Barbour clan overpowering. (And I don't blame him.) Johnny is carrying on with a babe named Judith Richardson, who is up to no good. And Claudia, poor child, is expecting a baby she doesn't want because she fears it will drive her husband right into Judith s waiting arms. (Johnny wants to be free. Free, I tell you!)

And Hazel? Well, Hazel is on a ship on her way to Honolulu. Last time I saw her, she was being powerfully attracted to a tall, dark and handsome character. I don't trust him. He wreathes white flowers into her hair and murmurs into her ear that no man can get anywhere with a woman until he understands her emotional, problems. Also, he's an artist. And you know those people.  Watch your step, Hazel. Don't ask me what happened to the second husbands of Hazel and Claudia. I don't know and I don't care.

FRANKLY, I find the Barbour family extremely tiresome. The program's merits on radio were never more than relative. On television the threadbare people, the threadbare situations, are glaring examples of how not to write television drama. The action and the direction are conducted on a note of sustained hysteria that passed fairly unnoticed in radio, but seems totally out of place in television. The most exasperating of all the Barbours, and conceivably the most irritating character ever created is Paul Barbour. It has been Paul's duty these 18 years to comfort the Barbours, to observe that a girl must be brave in periods of stress, that honesty is a good thing and that stealing is wrong.

So much for the Barbours. I'm going out to get drunk as a form of social protest. And don't you go lecturing me about the evils of drink, Paul Barbour. I know more about the evils of drink than all seven of you Barbours.

  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I realize I harp on this, but I think he spending is relevant.  She's not just buying new wigs. She's building a mansion, she's funding a sports complex, she's paying for operations for people she doesn't know, she's caring for Peaches, she's buying apartments. We saw ?her get ONE check for ONE million dollars. That's it. I may be wrong, but I thought they said she'd get a payment every 6 months. Regardless, she could not rule the roost on $1M, and the show is not doing a good job there. Pretending that doesn't matter? I can't do that.  All they had to do was add a couple lines about payouts and payments.  In other news, I would love to know just how much Anita was putting into that trust as well as what investment got her what has to be an incredible return.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm honestly surprised Nikki and Victor have not divorced yet... maybe their brief opening of the marriage did something for them. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • It reminded me of what the Pollocks got away with all the time on THE DOCTORS: long ass flashbacks that don't really add anything to the scene except time.  Because, if you remove the flashback, what's left?  Monica finishes packing Alan's suitcase.  The end. Oh, well.  At least I got to see a young Patricia Elliott (ex-Renee, OLTL) in that Aim toothpaste commercial (not to mention, a shirtless James O'Sullivan (ex-Jeff, AMC; ex-Pete, OLTL; ex-Jerry, SOMERSET) in the commercial for One-a-Day vitamins, lol).
    • Well, I can't help but think it would've been written different with CB still there
    • I could've sworn FV let other people direct either here or at OLTL. I may be wrong. IIRC Kimberly is now very active directing multi-cam/sitcom work. I'd forgotten she even did Netflix's One Day at a Time.
    • IIRC MVJ said the million was just the first piece of what Leslie got or was already owed, something they did make explicit in dialogue but not too explicit. Still, I am past worrying about it. I do think they want 30-yo elder millennial Peaches in her Sophia Petrillo wig to be a point of pathos for Leslie. In theory I am fine with that, and don't dislike Peaches despite the jarring physical disconnect and need for a recast lol. But I do think they do a lot of B&B-style whizzing from Point A to Point C with Leslie on this kind of stuff - in one scene she is raising hell, in the next she is weeping over Peaches. There's very little transition to that sometimes that allows for the nuance, and that can be done much better and they can go much deeper with Leslie (and most characters). The newer/younger audience for the show may have less issue with this kind of quick change than we do.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       Thank you.   That was part of my reasoning as well. I think about the days of Kevin, Joey, and Jessica on OLTL or Lucky/Liz/Nik/Sarah/Emily on GH or the Last Blast Kids on DAYS or the Glow by Jabot kids, and it takes me back. Sure I started soaps due to the older cast with their divas, but I do like to see people around my age back then, too. Great memories.   So I love a good relatable teen tale. Bullying. Hormones for the Bad Boy. College choices and internal conflict. 
    • Thank you for the information.  I did listen to the entire interview with Miss Roux -- way back when it was first released.  But I am unable to recall her mentioning Connie Ford, and don't have time nor effort to listen to the entire thing again, just for one small morsel. So again, thanks for responding.    I do recall Roux sounded extremely fragile and perhaps a bit wounded in the interview. I almost felt guilty for even listening to it.  So perhaps that has some influence on my reluctance to listen to it again.  She seemed troubled, to say the least.   
    • Boxer-briefs, huh?   Well...called it on Cane/Giggly Heffa hooking up so not surprised.
    • Do you have Addie’s first air date??
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy