Jump to content

"Columnist" Michael Musto Craps On Daytime Drama


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

while soaps always had a stigma, looking at outside soap publications they were def treated miles ahead of what they are today back in the day when they were daring and progressive. they became a joke in the late 8-'s and as they got worse, so did the critics. You wouldnt see them landing on the cover of a typical People or getting a feature & cover story in TIME today, or even TV Guide, thats for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The media in general now is about sneering and sarcasm, and it affects coverage of any show (the only time you get a positive review is if a show is seen as hip - and aside from GH during the Luke and Laura days, and Passions, for a year or two, soaps have never been seen as hip).

Soaps were given more respectful coverage when there was a stronger press, but even then, they were best known as the unspoken secret Mary Hartman parodied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Soaps were/are seen as primarily women's entertainment; women, for all their advancements in society, are still viewed by many males as second class citizens, thus their entertainment is "second class" or "crap." Not so for all the men and their sports (NASCAR, NFL, etc.), though. Yet another double-standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy