Jump to content

Days: End of Nov Spoilers


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Today i was visiting a friend at the supermarket. We were in the back when i spotted the soptted the soap mags so i flipped through them and man, oh man!...

Johnny goes missing and Bo/Hope find the body if a boy. It is reported by the news to be Johnny and Sami and EJ are together when they see it. She has pulled away from Rafe and blames him because she didnt want to go see John out of fear of something like that. Well, Sami and EJ start fighting, beat eachother up, then end up sleeping together. Sweeney is very good when talking about it, oretty much says this isnt romantic, and sami is doing it to feel anything but the pain. She wants to be numb. The writers state the same thing. Well... ya know that scene where Sami walks in on marlena and john? Will walks in on this and he goes off. The new writers say that Will essentally becomes to Sami what Sami was to Marlena and there is some shocking stuff coming up with him. They also state he is still going to be gay and he will be coming out sooner rather than later (I think in feb actually, but i think he tells some others before)

Bo/Hope relive losing Zach through this and talk about their issues. Marlena feels gulty because Sami didnt want to come and she pressured her into bringing the kids. EJ feels guilty because he set John up. No word on what actually has happened with Johnny tho.

Honestly, this sounds interesting and the scenes looked good in the promo. I will give this a shot. I like that they are honoring that moment that Sami saw john/mar now.

Just to be clear, they do NOT compare sami/ej to john/mar, just the situation of having an affair/sleeping together and a child walking in. its really worth a read if you can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This sounds great, in description. I do feel that these writers are aiming for something specific -- and maybe now that the really heavyhanded, kinda slow setup is over, we'll be getting to that. I've been pleasantly surprised by both the Jack/Jen scenes (which I feared would be them reverting to the played-out dynamic from JER 2.0) and the EJ/Nicole fallout (which I was worried would be a giant pointless retread, but instead, it's giving Nicole a voice).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The biggest difference is that Sami had the idea that her mother was a saint, and she idealized Roman and Marlena. Will doesn't feel that way about Sami, and Sami/Lucas have been split up for years. I'm not sure why this would have the same effect on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think people are taking it too literall.

It is a similar situation, with very different details.

Will hates EJ and would be pissed about this. He loved rafe and knows he is good for Sami. He has seen all this bull [!@#$%^&*] he has put her through over the years and played a pretty big role in her shooting him last year. I totally think he would blow up. Will eh may not have a sainted view of his mother he had bought into her i have changed act of recent years. I also feel like a lot of pent up issues he has with her from his entire life may come out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So Sami and EJ deal with their son being missing by having sex? That's beyond gross and it looks like I am done with Days for good. I was watching for a while when the reboot started but I got behind and was planning to catch up. Looks like now I don't have to. Hopefully, this sinks Days ratings even lower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This sounds horrible. Let me see, Sami, EJ, Nicole, some Sami child in peril..when have I seen this crap before? Oh yeah, five minutes ago. And for this they needed to switch writers why again? And lets see if we can figure this out: One day down the road Sami will discover EJ set the whole thing in motion and yell a lot, and everyone will be mad at EJ and Stefano will disown him and say his only son is Chad, and maybe for a twist EJ can lose all access to his kids and Nicole will be there too saying she loves Johnny like he was her own.

And people resent John and Marlena for being a retread?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They actually think he's dead. Alison Sweeny actually had to reconcile the idea with having sex while thinking your child is dead with her own thoughts as a parent, she said it's the hardest thing she's ever had to do.

Sooooo tired of grief sex. But the fallout could be interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Honestly, if you can - even if you are interested in this, in fact esp if you are against this - read the interview/tease/set up in SOD.

Sweeney delivered in that interview. be it spin, her honest view point, or whatever. It is a facinating read, esp when as Khan Darn said, she talks about how hard it was go from that place of losing a child and turning it into a sex scene. And the way she describes the final fight with Sami & Rafe sounds like it has some power behind it.

It also slightly teases Will after it and Bo/Hope dealing with Zach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
    • Good morning, boys!  I figured that it was time that our Gio was introduced into the hotness thread

      Please register in order to view this content

      @ranger1rg I even included a close up of his face for ya!
    • Under all of Madonna's social media today there is this wave of negative, toxic, absurd comments by Lady Gaga fans telling her how Gaga surpassed her in concert in Copacabana. I mean... Who the hell cares? Why are these fan communities so freaking toxic??? I'm sure Madonna doesn't care... But still. Have some respect for M. Leave her social media alone. Go cheer Gaga and be happy. Why come and spew hate on M??? Crazy world.
    • FYI, again, Ruth/Letitia is not in either of these 2 episodes. So that concludes the 4 episodes I had from Nov. 1983. I don't have the October episodes.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy