Jump to content

The NFL Thread


Soapsuds

Recommended Posts

  • Members

This morning I listened briefly to ESPN's Colin Cowherd make his case for why Andrew Luck should be Rookie of the Year. I generally pay more attention to discussions about awards in baseball than any of the other sports and this year the arbitrary nature of choosing the recipients became was glaring. So now I see the same arbitrary points being made for ROY and MVP. Cowherd pointed to the awful record of the Colts last year, the fact that Andrew Luck has to throw the ball more than Robert Griffin, III, and that RGIII made shorter passes, and that Andrew Luck played in all the games (RGIII missed one). He was debating someone who had a response for all of those stats which caused Cowherd to reach for how Andrew Luck has won games in the 4th quarter and this prompted me to turn him off. I find that winning in the 4th quarter disingenuous on his part since the same was said about Tim Tebow last season and he didn't seem to find this of much value with Tim Tebow.

There needs to be set criteria for awards so that one year it's not based on who makes it into the playoffs and another strictly on stats despite no playoff appearance. MLB awarded Felix Hernandez a Cy Young (despite his team's losing record) because they thought his individual stats merited it. One of the arguments in favor of Justin Verlander winning the Cy Young for the second consecutive year was that his team would be in the playoffs and David Price's team wouldn't. All the voters didn't go with that premise and David Price ended up winning but it's an illustration of how flaky the criteria is. I take issue with the reason against one person being the same as the reason in favor of another.

I don't think they can go wrong choosing any of the three most talked about NFL rookies (which includes Russell Wilson). I just don't need to hear that the reason Andrew Luck should get is because the Colts were bottom dwellers last year. He's not the only reason that team has turned around. Bill Polian should be blamed for not drafting viable back up quarterbacks, because the Colts should have been able to plug in a quarterback (as did the Patriots with Matt Cassell when Tom Brady was out), and still have a decent record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 179
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The root of the problem is Jerry Jones but his ego is so big that he wont make drastic changes...he wants a coach he can control...thats why he fired Jimmy Johnson since then Dallas went downhill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

3 out of the 4 games this weekend was pretty boring - WSH/SEA being the only decent game. Mike Shananhan should've played Kirk Cousins way earlier instead of risking further damage to RG3's knee. I'm glad Trent Williams smacked Richard Sherman in the face. I hate that guy. I don't mind if you trash talk within the game, but don't do it once the game is over.

http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/01/06/trent-williams-mushed-richard-sherman-who-was-yapping-again-after-seattle-beat-washington/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My FB feed got mighty quiet after the Skins lost today. All season, Skins fans have treated RGIII like the Second Coming and it was pretty devastating to see his knee go out and he had to be taken out of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Yay for the Pats but it sucks that Gronk is out for the season. Just loved watching Brady work the high temp, no huddle offense. On a lot of plays the Houston defense looked like they didn't know what they were doing. I hope to see more of Vereen as a "wide receiver" - he has pretty good hands. Loved Belichick's reaction when the Pats scored a TD. "We scored a TD? Meh, back to coaching my defense." LOL

Manning and the Broncos lost in the same game last year with Tebow. Take that Elway!! I'm a Tebow fan so I was happy Elway lost. smile.png

Kaepernick was unstoppable! I think he's the real deal and has a lot of upside. Harbaugh made the right decision when he sat Alex Smith.

Brandon Spikes' little dance move laugh.png

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvQkNRjY7qQ

So glad the Falcons won! Hate Richard Sherman. I couldn't believe that horrible squib kick at the end that gave Seattle a chance. What was that!?? LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not a fan of Tim Tebow nor do I have anything against him. ESPN's excessive coverage and fixation on him probably contributed most to to the anti-Tebow sentiment that exists. I really don't get any of those people that claim he's shoving his beliefs in their faces because I haven't seen any evidence of that. I do think that ESPN's constant harping on it made it seem that way. They were just as disingenuous with him as they were with their camping around Bret Favre. I don't know how many times I heard one of their analysts claim to be tired of hearing about Bret Favre when they were the ones driving the conversation. As far as I could see, Bret Favre wasn't standing outside everyday making any statements. To hear them talk, you would think he was forcing them to follow him around while he tried to make up his mind. No one sent them to the Jets' training camp and no one insisted that any of their analysts make proclamations about how Tim Tebow would end up being the starting quarterback on the Jets by the third or fourth game of the season.

It's pretty sad to hear anyone labeled an expert saying that the Jacksonville Jaguars should sign Tim Tebow purely on the basis of selling tickets. These are the same individuals who bemoan how athletes are used by team owners who don't care about their well being basically advocating an owner pimping out Tim Tebow. They probably just want to be able to criticize the team after the fact. Hopefully that new GM keeps his word.

I respect John Elway's accomplishments in the NFL but I'm no fan of his either. I don't think he did Tim Tebow wrong. Josh McDaniels did by drafting him at such a high spot. He also did no favors to the team and he created a mess. The infatuation with Tim Tebow seems to blind people to the fact that he's not even a decent quarterback. And even though Peyton Manning is more than a decent quarterback, the team benefits most from being in an extremely sorry division. Hue Jackson screwed the Raiders over by luring Carson Palmer from his couch. The Chiefs are irrelevant. The Chargers perpetually fool their fans into thinking they're this close but this season they didn't even muster up that eternal hope. That's on them for believing that Norv Turner was going to do what they didn't give Marty Shottenheimer a chance to try. So as great as Peyton may be, this was more a story of his ability to return from surgery than it was about the Broncos being any good.

Last season the Raiders were decent until Jason Campbell got injured and Hue Jackson had an idiotic revelation. I don't even get why USC quarterbacks get drafted so high because look at some of the most recent crop: Mark Sanchez, Matt Leinart, and Carson Palmer. They might do well emough at the college level and even win a Heisman trophy but it does not seem to translate into big time in the pros. But I digress. Tim Tebow provided a bit of a story with the Broncos but most of that was sheer exaggeration. The Steelers just about beat themselves every Sunday they play and their defense is usually great when it doesn't matter. And of course, the Raiders provided the playoffs gift by not rising to the occasion and winning the one game they needed to win. Dallas Cowboys anyone?

The Broncos did the same thing as the Spurs did when they last played the Lakers, they tried their hardest to give the game away. Somehow the Lakers could not reach out and take the gift but the Ravens did not make that mistake. The Falcons are lucky that the Seahawks are equally as generous as they are. I don't think I've seen more blown coverages on third down conversions outside of watching the Steelers regular shenanigans.

My major gripe with football is the ridiculous celebrations at stopping first and second downs only to give up third down and even fourth down conversions. Celebrate when you actually win the game.

I have no interest in the Superbowl unless the 49ers make it and put a beat down on either of those two tiresome teams (Ravens or Patriots). I don't care if the Falcons get there but I don't see them beating the Patriots....though anything is possible. ESPN is probably salivating over the Harbaugh brothers take two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • According to the French Santa Barbara site the Andrades had a house in the early episodes.  I thought I remembered scenes in their home. http://santabarbara-online.com/index2.htm
    • I always wondered if the Andrades lived at the Capwell Mansion?  Certainly they could've had a living room in their space or wherever they went on days off. But, I felt like it was never clear whether Santana visited Rosa when Kelly and Eden were young, or if she actually lived in the servant's quarters (one hopes modern developers have found a euphemism for that space).  I always imagined that Rosa, Santana, and Reuben lived with CC up until Channing was murdered, and then they found their own place because the kids were mostly over 18 (and Santana was pregnant). I like the idea of Rueban and CC being close until Santana got pregnant.  And then Reuben would've hated the adoption of Brandon.  Which would have meant he hated CC, and would've only continued to work for him to try to get info on whatever happened to his grandson.
    • I liked the original 4 family set up.  The families were all different from each other and were intertwined.  They should have been given equal airtime. I felt that Lockridges were perfectly cast with the exception of Laken.  She should have been quickly recast.   I liked all 4 of the actors cast as the Andrades and wish they would have been given better writing.  I really thought Ava Lazar (Santana) would have been one of the breakout stars if she had not been replaced. My only issue with the casting of the Perkins family was Robert Alan Browne as John and as much as I liked Mark Arnold he was the wrong actor to recast Joe Perkins. And of course it was ridiculous how badly they screwed up the casting of CC. The other Capwells were well cast.
    • This late 1976 stuff doesn't sound as bad as it has in other versions I've read (weekly recaps from Jon-Michael Reed and SOD synopses). I am surprised that there is a variation of Ian - Meg - Arlene - Tom playing out this late in the game, but it doesn't sound half bad. Ian's involvement with Beaver Ridge and how it impacts Rick and Cal's future also intrigued me  more than I expected. Even the Carrie - Betsy connection having Carrie watch Suzanne while Ben is visiting was a nice surprise. I feel like this all falls apart pretty quickly with the arrival of Mia Marriott, Michael Blake, and a slew of other half baked characters under Upton.  
    • Too bad she ended up on Y&R. Actress Valarie Pettiford might've been "Sharon" because she sings too and does it pretty well.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • @NothinButAttitude thanks for sharing the rough draft. I had bought "Shadows on the Wall" from Kathryn Leigh Scott's website probably 20+ years ago. It's a fascinating read into a very different version of what the show could have been. 
    • @Efulton That's the quote I was refering to. In the bible, at almost the beginning, Rueben and C.C. were compared as being similar as two fathers wanting everything for their children, or something along those lines. I do think the Andrades were intended to have more of a role, but they never even garnered a family set (just Santana's apartment). In 1991, they added the Capwell kitchen which seemed to be a domestic space for Rosa, but clearly not solely Rosa's. I feel like I remember Rosa confronting Santana about her feelings for C.C. being an attempt to recreate her grand fantasy with Channing, Jr. in the kitchen, but more likely that was the bedroom Santana was redecorating (C.C.'s master suite) utilizing the designsshe had envisioned for herself and Channing, Jr.  
    • On the French Santa Barbara site Ismael Carlo did not hold back about how he felt about the Dobsons. http://santabarbara-online.com/index2.htm How did you start in Santa Barbara ? My recollection is that I auditioned for the role. After a couple of weeks of contract negotiations I was told that all was in order and that I would start work in a couple of weeks or so. But that's when the sh*t hit the fan. In her high petulant way she (Bridget Dobson) commenced to tell me how all her South American workers were beholding to her. How she treated them, "like children". I said to her, "I'm not a child". She got upset and started to cry. I told her that if she did not want me on the show, all she had to do was break the contract and pay me. It never happened. The Dobsons, who were the producers, where a pair of what you would call in your country aristocrats in their minds. I almost quit just before I started. But like any actor at the time I stuck it out all because of the work. I don't think I will ever sell my soul again. I was also able to perform with the lead actor and director in a production of his: Romeo & Juliet. I played Papa Capulet.
    • It's kismet – I was just thinking about Azure C the other day and revisited some of the press from that era. Reading it now, it’s undeniably cringeworthy how often the articles emphasized that the actress was a cisgender woman. It wasn’t framed as a critique of The City for not casting a trans actress—it felt more like a reassurance to viewers that, yes, the storyline involved transgender themes, but they weren’t actually going to show anything. ABC ran an ad in TV Guide that teased that Azure would confess her past – that she “was once a he” – to her love interest Bernardo (similar to the onscreen headline in their tabloid). Rather than focusing on thoughtful representation, the press framed the twist as a dramatic surprise for audiences, to capitalize on shock value.  It was clearly not treated like other social issues had been on ABC Daytime.  They were usually more respectful, and pedantic toward the audience, where this was just about revealing a secret. Of course, the irony is that the only actual protests came from GLAAD over ABC's ignorance, rather than anyone from the right, as they had feared.
    • Having seen what Long did with Mason and Julia on SB, I can't see Long ever being able to write a fun/lightweight story for Nola and Quint. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy