Jump to content

GH: Classic Thread


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

It's weird how quickly he drops out of the Sonny/Brenda story because in the beginning it does seem like they are setting up a triangle and there is the hilarious scene of Sean Kanan and Mo playing basketball aggressively after Washington D.C.  And then AJ just isn't really part of the equation anymore.  

Please register in order to view this content

This scene is never not funny.  From the height disparity to the fact Sonny is in a suit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Adult A.J. has the misfortune of arriving on the scene during the second Monty run around June, 1991. In terms of story, he replaces James Morrison's Joey Moscini in the younger leading male role. Part of A.J.'s issue is that there are no strongly connected characters to the canvas in his age range. They place him in the same orbit as Sheila Cantillion, the nurse who Joey had chased after. His major conflict was he was using his parents' broken marriage to justify his own poor behavior. Gerald Hopkins, the first adult A.J., isn't terrible, but the character of A.J. feels very underdeveloped in the material I have seen.

It's not until they decide to give A.J. an issue with alcohol that he develops a stronger sense of a presence on the canvas. This occurs around late 1991 in final weeks of Monty or the first weeks of Wendy Riche. By the time Nikki Langton is on the canvas, A.J. has already been arrested for a DUI and seems to be trying to get better, but who's sobriety is definitely in jeopardy for getting involved with a woman like Nikki. Nikki becomes the necessary catalyst in the younger set that include A.J., Sheila, and Dr. Eric Simpson with Nikki going after Eric and A.J. at different points to achieve her goals of obtaining the information she needs in regards to her father. Previously, prior to the drinking, A.J. was the troublemaker planting drugs in Simpson's locker at General Hospital to make him look bad to Sheila, but ultimately nearly costing Eric his job. The shift in persona made A.J. more rootable as he was just so self absorbed in his early days. 

Riche seems pretty influential in shaping the younger canvas having brought on Karen Wexler during the interim (as part of Audrey Hardy's VolunTeens program at General Hospital) and Jagger (through the robbery episodes I haven't really go into yet. Riche has also spoken about how she wanted to do the AIDS storyline initially with A.J. as a result of some sexual experience in college that may have been with a man or with a woman. A.J. was definitely a character that Riche had a strong outline for of who she wanted him to be, but not necessarily the direction she wanted him to go. At least that is how I look at it. 

I think as early as Gerald Hopkins, there is hints of resentment brewing underneath the surface between A.J. and Jason with Jason clearly the golden child and A.J. constantly feeling the need to prove himself. I think it was cemented more when Sean Kanan took over the part in February, 1993. To an extent, I think A.J.'s resentment was initially directed to Eric Simpson because he was a doctor at General Hospital working with his mother and father. Eric garnered the respect from A.J.'s parents that A.J. couldn't. Nothing I've seen has played heavy into this, but there seems to be an undercurrent to their animosity. 

When Kanan arrives, I definitely got the sense that the show was building A.J. and Julia as a thing because they were also building competition between A.J. and Ned at ELQ. A.J. was trying to find his way back into ELQ with Ned refusing based on some prior missteps A.J. had taken during a prior stint under Gerald Hopkins. I thought that all made sense, but they also layered Jason and A.J.'s relationship with A.J. still in the shadows of his little brother, but also really wanting to play the protective older brother when it came to Karen and Jagger.

A.J.'s anger towards Jagger is intriguing. I guess it was misplaced anger relating to Alan's involvement in Nikki jilting A.J., but there is at least one point where the scriptwriters joke that A.J.'s sexuality maybe in question. Marco makes an off the cuff comment to A.J. at the gym about Marco being a fighter, not a lover in regards to A.J.'s attempt to interact with him. It may have just a been a natural extension of the show's undercurrent of toxic machismo from that era, but I still find it intriguing. To be fair though, an underfive gives Dominque and Lucy a strange look earlier in Levinson's run when Dominque is talking about how excited she is to have a baby with Lucy.  

I could see the mileage the show could get out of A.J. and Brenda given the dynamics between A.J./Jason, Jason/Brenda, A.J./Julia, Ned / A.J., Julia/Ned, and Julia/Brenda. There would be a lot of angles to explore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A.J and Nikki never really interacted with people their own age. They did with Eric and Sheila to a point. But they were dud characters. Sheila, and Eric were never properly developed or integrated they just randomly popped up. It was a shame that Dawn was dead by this point. Dawn vs Nikki could've been interesting. Along with Decker in the mix. Dawn after all was both AJ and Nikki's older half sibling.

 

 

Edited by victoria foxton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for that really interesting deep dive into AJ.  I don't really have a clear view of AJ before Sean Kanan, so I enjoyed you breaking it down so clearly.  Was AJ de-aged in your opinion with SK?  He seems to have lived quite a bit, but didn't seem that much older than the teen group and mostly interacted with them.

+1

There was so much potential even with Ned/Julia/AJ triangle and then she got canned.  Not to mention all the things she could have done with Brenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember a person elsewhere who was absolutely obsessed with Gerald Hopkins' brief run as A.J. and insisted he be put forth as a Todd recast on OLTL in the early 2000s. I've barely ever seen him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I will never understand the demonization of the Quartermaine family. Yes they would bicker but it wasn't this menacing, destructive, intentional abuse they painted it as. Alan and Monica regularly hurt each other because of their oversized egos but they loved their children and were more attentive than most soap opera parents. Edward wasn't far from a great husband or father but he loved his kids and his wife and would close ranks whenever outsiders turned out to be a real threat. And Lila was the kindest person on the whole damn planet.

You had someone like Carly barreling into every scene, catching an attitude with potted plants, lying just because it's 4:37 on a Tuesday yet the Quartermaines are evil incarnate?

I just don't understand how as a writer you can have a subset of characters throw a tantrum and barware because they didn't get their way that week yet Alan and Monica arguing for two minutes (no really, go watch some of the Quartermain scenes where they're meant to be seen as awful. 90% of the time it's all of them yelling at each other with one of the "good" characters like Emily (die you ungrateful street urchin) screaming "Would you all just STOP?!") is somehow beyond the pale.

I'd say Tracy and Edward were the only truly mean-spirited members of the family and after a certain point Edward was just a cantankerous old man yelling at the sky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was always outsize with reality. Carly, Jason and later Sonny would whine incessantly about the evils of the Qs but anyone watching longer than 3 minutes in those years saw a boisterous, often comedy-oriented rich family that just bickered a lot. You were not dealing with Victor Lord or even Victor Newman.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was a narrative started pre-Carly though.  It started with Ned/Lois and Lois being afraid to raise her child in that world which I never really got either, but Rena was leaving.  It obviously got worse once Jason had his accident and everything that happened after that, but it was always a little strange to me.

Also agree 100% about Emily.  She is an ungrateful brat that should be a lot more thankful to the wealthy family that took her in when she was a literal orphan out of the kindness of their hearts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's down to Guza knowing they were easy foils for Jason and Sonny, the cool, hip, edgy mobsters. Beyond that, they were a part of the show's legacy, which Guza also hated, and resented, as they would remind he was stuck on a soap, rather than working in primetime in movies. You could always feel the sheer loathing for them any time they appeared in his run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Apologies for the delay in derailing the thread 

Please register in order to view this content

! I am going to try to post summary info from 1968 on a more regular basis. If it gets to be too much of a thread derailment, please let me know and I'll dial it back. I am aware that not everyone cares about the happenings from 50+ years ago, but I feel like this "lost info" may be valuable to some.

Monday, January 1, 1968: Dr. Henry Pinkham, Sr., Henry's uncle, comes looking for his nephew; Steve and Meg receive letters from Iris who has gone back to Kansas City.

Tuesday, January 2: Lucille gets more than she bargained for from Audrey when she attempts to persuade Audrey to postpone the divorce.

Wednesday, January 3: Lt. Todd interviews Tom Baldwin again; Steve and Audrey reconcile.

Thursday, January 4: Todd interviews Polly again, checking her memory of what she overheard between Jessie and Tom the night before the wedding.

Friday, January 5: Lucille is indignant in her interview with Todd.

Monday, January 8: After Lee locates Iris in a Kansas City motel, Meg convinces Lee to go.

Tuesday, January 9: Tom warns Jessie of Todd's theory that he and Jessie were romantically involved and are responsible for John's death.

Wednesday, January 10: Steve and Audrey plan a second honeymoon.

Thursday, January 11: The District Attorney interviews Polly.

Friday, January 12: The D.A. tells Todd that Polly is a satisfactory witness, but he will interview Jessie and Tom before he charges them with murder.

Monday, January 15: Lee convinces Iris to come home with him.

Tuesday, January 16: Polly refuses to tell Tom about her talks with the police.

Wednesday, January 17: Jessie is interviewed by the D.A., but refuses to answer when asked if Tom ever told her he loved her.

Thursday, January 18: Meg goes to see Iris.

Friday, January 19: Iris is skeptical about some of the 12 steps in A.A.

Monday, January 22: Tom is outraged by a newspaper article naming him and Jessie as suspects in the Prentice murder.

Tuesday, January 23: Meg goes to see Iris, and tells her that Lee needs a new secretary.

Wednesday, January 24: The D.A. tells Todd he is ready to take the case to court.

Thursday, January 25: Tom and Jessie are arrested for the murder of Dr. Prentice.

Friday, January 26: Lee argues that the defendants' reputations should convince the judge to set bail.

Monday, January 29: Jessie and Tom are released on bail; Audrey phones to say that she and Steve are rushing back from Hot Springs.  Later, police call Jessie with word there has been an accident, and Audrey is being brought in by ambulance.

Tuesday, January 30: The severity of Audrey's injuries are unknown. Jessie tries to comfort Steve.

Wednesday, January 31: Dr. Nelson tells Steve that the fetal heartbeat is weak and suspects complications.

Thursday, February 1: Audrey forces Dr. Nelson to tell her that all is not well with the baby.

Friday, February 2: Jessie tries to comfort Audrey without success.

Monday, February 5: Audrey insists on having a Caesarian section, and Dr. Nelson reluctantly agrees.

Tuesday, February 6: Lee interviews Polly.

Wednesday, February 7: Steve, Lucille and Jessie learn the baby did not survive.

Thursday, February 8: Iris offers to work with Lee on the trial.

Friday, February 9: Steve breaks the heartwrenching news to Audrey.

Monday, February 12: Audrey tries to get Steve to promise they will try for another baby.

Tuesday, February 13: Polly is intrigued with Lt. Todd suggests that Jessie's murder conviction will invalidate John's will, leaving Polly the sole heir.

Wednesday, February 14: Tom suggests to Lee that he plead guilty to let Jessie go free.

Thursday, February 15: The jury is selected.

Friday, February 16: The D.A. promises a strong case in his opening statement.

Monday, February 19: Lee makes his opening statement.

Tuesday, February 20: Steve asks Lucille for help dismantling the nursery before Audrey gets home.

Wednesday, February 21: Meg feels left out of Lee's life in court and at the office.

Thursday, February 22: Steve is an expert witness for the state and fears he was not much help to his friends.

Friday, February 23: Lee cross-examines Steve.

Monday, February 26: It is Steve and Audrey's wedding anniversary, and Steve takes her home. She is broken to find the nursery has been dismantled.

Tuesday, February 27: The D.A. tries to break Lucille's loyalty on the stand. He produces evidence that the bottle of Alkaloid X-34 had Jessie's fingerprints.

Wednesday, February 28: Meg is subpoenaed.

Thursday, February 29: Under oath, Meg admits that Tom told her he loves Jessie.

Friday, March 1: The D.A. successfully makes his point over Lee's protest while Steve is a witness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy