Jump to content

AMC: Thursday, August 4, 2011


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

What's the point? It's not like Jake was an innocent in all this. He was emotionally cheating on Amanda for months with Cara. With her cancer, why bring up stuff that is now pointless?

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

Nice episode. I like Erica trying to help Dixie but gawd almighty how hard up is that Oakhaven orderly to go sniffing around Janet? Geez man, get a hooker.

I'm okay with where Jake/Amanda are. Yes, there should've been more fall out from the cheating on both sides but that's just another casualty of cancellation and that's okay. Frankly, I've seen enough men on ABC calling their wives and girlfriends "bitch" and "whore" to last me a lifetime and as long as JR is on the show I'm pretty sure AMC will do its part to meet the "bitch/whore/skank" quota. I like seeing Jake step up for his wife and I like the fact that Tad/Cara/Jake/Amanda have made peace and are acting like a family. That's the Martin vibe I like. I really enjoyed Opal getting Amanda to realize that she is good enough for Jake and that the show highlighted that Amanda's insecurity is really more about Janet not Jake. She's afraid of being rejected because she thinks people see Janet in her. That was a nice bit of character growth. It reminded me a little of Erica telling Jane to own her identity.

And yes, I'm going to say it: I HATE that Dixie's return means that Tad is going to be shackled once again as half of this dysfunctional played-out "supercouple." He and Cara are great together and MEK and LH have wonderful chemistry. Tad and Dixie hadn't been genuinely happy since before Brian Bodine.

  • Members
Posted

So she wouldnt be deported. There are people in Mexico that want to kill her. Dont ask me why. The story never made sense and it was merely a plot device to keep her in town as the danger to her life never materialized

  • Members
Posted

Not too mention that Tad has two young kids, yet that didnt come into consideration when he moves Cara into that home with them

  • Members
Posted

I think they are adorable and I think MEK and Lindsey work well together but no they have no sexual chemistry but not every couple needs to be hot and steamy. Look at all the sexless couples on GH. But I am so over Dixie back from

the dead. It's nice for fans of Tad and DIxie and yeah it was a blunder killing her off but out of all these returns, hers is the one I have been least excited about. Adam, Brooke, even Leo yes and I think I might even like Gillians. Dixie is like meh to me.

And Jake and Amanda, I think the fallout could have been bigger. But I tend to agree its nice for a change to see a couple handle it maturely and take responsibility both of them. Sure its not that soapy but I tend to think the whole Cara, Jake, Tad, Amanda, JR stuff changed course when the cancellation hit anyway.

  • Members
Posted

And this is what has killed soaps. Good lord another WTD story? I know I know its a soap staple and so relevant in 2011. Blech. I can almost be grateful AMC got cancelled so we wouldn't have to see another one of these play out. I kind of like the idea of Amanda having cervical cancer. Now there is a story relevant to 2011 and you at least have writers at the helm who can likely tell this kind of story.

And seeing Leo WOW!!! I like how they ended the show. Now thats the way to do a cliffhanger.

  • Members
Posted

@Eric - There was no second death for Mike Roy. As you know, that resurrection was part of McTavish disastrous 1998 return to AMC. She clearly didn't get the significance of Mike on Erica's life and wrote the whole thing for "laughs." They were nothing like the intense couple of 15 years prior. As I recall it, Erica soon seemed as put off as the viewers, and Mike simply left town.

That aside, I replayed that obituary scene several times on DVR - and I can't really tell what Ryan mumbled right there. For all I know, he could have said "my groin!"

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • After the slap it does feel inevitable - being arrested and thrown out right after her big win.
    • Yesterday it was Theo and Jada.  Today it's Chad and Belle.  What a mess.  
    • I asked my soap historian GPT to help pull together the best available sources on Daniel Pilon’s run, and here’s what the research confirms: * Pilon played Max Dubujak on *Ryan’s Hope* from 1983–88. * He began appearing as Alan Spaulding on *Guiding Light* in 1988. * An academic source notes that he appeared as **Max and Alan simultaneously in November 1988 * His later-life interviews mention major upheavals, including losing his home in the Northridge earthquake and declaring bankruptcy in 1994.  That’s the factual foundation. Now for the human side of it. I’ll admit Pilon was never my favorite Alan. The Spauldings are supposed to have that patrician, Midwestern money vibe, and suddenly here comes this very European-sounding gentleman sweeping into Springfield like he wandered in from a different soap entirely. It created a strange tonal shift, at least in my memory. Whether he was intended to be temporary is hard to pin down, but honestly, looking at what he was dealing with in his real life, I don’t know that the show ever had a truly stable window to figure it out. He was going through marital strife, while being talked about as the "next James Bond" back in Canada, and juggling work on two soaps at once is a lot. Under those circumstances, the question of whether he was the “right” type for Alan becomes almost secondary to the fact that he was working through multiple emergencies while stepping into one of GL’s biggest roles. So for me, the story of his Alan isn’t just about casting fit. It’s about an actor navigating chaos, the show adapting on the fly, and Springfield getting a very unexpected version of one of its cornerstone characters.  
    • I wish Nicole had swallowed but it is what it is lol 
    • You're probably right, but it's such a mistake to have Dani return to Bill. I do not want that. I like Bill, but that's probably because he's so much better than his garbage wife. Having Dani take back the guy who NEVER stopped cheating on her during their marriage would be a terrible mistake.  Yes, it's a mistake I can see Dani making. That doesn't mean I want to see it.
    • That's funny, I totally didn't think about the possibility that they'll pin this on someone else.  I assumed they'd just roll him into the water.  Obviously, I would not make an ideal hitman. I hope it's not Laura.
    • Andre/Dani, be still my heart 

      Please register in order to view this content

        I knew their booty call hook ups then being friends with benefits were so going to turn into love 
    • Yes it does!! And neglect! They let it drop so long and so often it doesn’t really have much meaning beyond another recurring character killed off. I kind of agree. I don’t want Emma to be SA’d, but he was a creepy professor perv at first, and we could have higher stakes if they let him be a scumbag for longer. Even to add more suspects, like Gio punched his lights out for grabbing Emma innapropriately. Or even better, she punches him, then Gio does too. He had the potential to be fun for a bit longer. I always love it when they do a shooting in the snow on this show lol.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      I went back to see how teen Sami even figured out how to sell a baby in 1993, and the recap is unintentionally hilarious. The exposition is so blunt it feels like the writers drafted it between bites of lunch. Suddenly there’s a teen mom named Karen who sold her baby through a shady lawyer, and somehow Sami just… knows this man and pays him with hospital volunteer money. You can tell they were trying to make the whole thing “plausible” enough, but also knew the baby wouldn’t be gone long enough to justify a real subplot.  I know one thing, if Karen had confided in Jamie, Sami would've never met Steve Miller. Jamie knew that snitches get stitches. Not to be confused with the horrific Stephen Miller, who was 8 in 1993. AND Just to show the audience how shady Steve the lawyer could be, he was played by this guy -- Character actor Terry Wills was cast as creeps on every sitcom in the 1980s.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy