Jump to content

Ratings from the 70's


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I totally love that you know this. And, of course, share the knowledge. Imagine. You're at the studio. You know you have only one more day of show in the can. You literally have no idea what you're going to be doing the next several weeks. Then the news comes out. A vote was taken. We're saved! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 8/12/74-8/16/74 & 8/19/74-8/23/74:

Please register in order to view this content

 

FAST WEEKLY WEEK OF 8/26/74-8/30/74 NOT AVAILABLE

(Note: Per newspaper listings, on 8/28/74 The Doctors, Edge of Night and Girl in My Life were preempted by a Ford News Conference from 230-3PM; there were no other scheduled preemptions and all other daytime shows were scheduled to air every day this week).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IKR?  Especially Y&R. To go from #10 in May to #2 in August...that might be the second most remarkable thing to happen in the '70's ratings after GH's turnaround in '77/'78.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes AMC really popped in July and August 1974. AMC I think hit number 1 for the first time in 1973. Restless steadily moving up in the summer and then pops. I think in the fall of 74 AMC and Restless have good ratings but not great ratings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Still, it goes to show you what can happen when TPTB exercises a little bit of patience with a show or shows that have potential.  Nowadays, AMC and/or Y&R probably would be off the air within six months, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Longtime fans like @vetsoapfan and @Reverend Ruthledge might have a better understanding of this, but from everything I've read, 1966-1975 was a very rough time for GL.  Robert Soderberg and Edith Sommer wrote some key material of that period.  Otherwise, GL was struggling when the Dobsons came in and re-energized the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I think the show suffered from the revolving door of head writers during that time. It was a weird mix of too many cooks in the kitchen and stagnation as they tried to hold on too much to a certain pace and way of doing things because of the lack of cohesive forward-focus. They weren't going forward like the other soaps during that time. Or, at least, not as much. Other shows were more ok with doing new things and stepping up the pace. There wasn't a clear direction on how to go evolve and so the audience, I'm sure, looked at the show as stale and boring. I, personally, don't think it was either of those things but there was a huge shift in the late 60s/early 70s culturally. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@Reverend Ruthledge summarized the situation perfectly, as always, but I would like to add my personal opinion from viewing that time period of the soap.

Agnes Nixon only left at the tail-end of 1966, if I recall correctly, and TGL was excellent for most of that year.

Then the revolving door of writers began. Perhaps P&G kept hiring and firing different scribes in an attempt to find the perfect one to helm the show, but there were probably more than a dozen head writers credited from the time Nixon departed to when the Dobsons came aboard in 1975. The quality of their material was uneven, to say the least. Some very capable writers were hired, like Jane and Ira Avery, Robert Soderberg and Edith Sommer, even Irna Phillips. Unfortunately,  there were dregs among the choices, too, like James Lipton (who somehow managed to get hired twice--UGH) and Gabrielle Upton. The constant shift in quality, tone and focus was jarring and off-putting.

IMHO, the weakest years of the show were 1973, 74, and into 1975 until the Dobsons arrived.

Of course, TGL had the misfortune of heavy competition from NBC (Another World) and ABC (General Hospital) in the early 1970s. Both those shows peaked from, say, 1971-74. A disorganized soap with poor writing was bound to falter in such conditions. (I still remained steadfastly loyal to Springfield, however!)

Then, General Hospital completely fell apart around 1975, with its own revolving door of weak writers.

With one of its principle competitors sinking fast, and with a renewed vigor thanks to the Dobsons, TGL started to rebound in the ratings. Even in a few years, when Gloria Monty and Douglas Marland brought GH back to new heights of popularity, TGL continued to acquit itself nicely with solid ratings. (By that time, it was AW's turn to wane.) 

Anyway, all this to say: back in the 1960s and 1970s, all soaps had their ups and downs. Fans just understood that if we remained patient, the ships' courses would be corrected soon enough. That has not been the case for decades now, however, as soaps have been allowed to sink into a state of lethargy and disrepair, and remain that way indefinitely. So many soaps have ended in cancellation, with the same hacks in place who helped destroy the genre in the first place.

At least in the early 1970s, TPTB knew TGL needed help and working on fixing it.

(BTW, I am not saying that I totally loved everything that happened to TGL under the Dobsons, but I'd take them as writers over James Lipton any day.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Which could make sense , except that we have seen Mariah function for years w/o any real residue pain from her upbringing. Josh decides to randomly make it a thing, when a good writer might foreshadow that for months. It's not like he's just arrived at the show. He's been there for years . Everything seems to be thought out only a few weeks ahead. It's like Phyllis all freaky from being kidnapped when she has done a million other things that didn't seem to bother her at all.
    • Unrelated, sort of, but he looks absolutely nothing like Amanda Setton or Dominic Zamprogna so it's kind of hilarious they decided to make Gio their kid.  It's very clear this was not the original origin story for Gio when they cast him. He is a very handsome guy though. 
    • I tend to agree, although going back to OLTL, Frank has so often cast guys who are meant to be attractive yet come across as cold and dead, I'm surprised he managed to get one who has a bit of a pulse.
    • For all I care, the boy can parade around in a g-string.  It won't make this show suck any less.
    • AMC was about a decade later so things may have changed by then, although maybe they never approached her anyway. She joined Santa Barbara in 1985, when they didn't seem interested in bringing back Hope. SB ended in late 1992, so JFP could have asked her back, but I doubt she did. For as much as JFP clearly had some use for Rick Hearst given that she hired him on GH and kept him around as often as she could, I don't think she ever used Alan-Michael well. I can't see Elvera as Delia, but she could have worked well as Faith - she had a glimpse of a strong personality alongside warmth, which only one Faith ever managed (Catherine Hicks).
    • IIRC, FC reruns aired for awhile on Lifetime, way before the network became the Women in Peril Channel, lol.
    • PAM!! YES!!! You have jogged my memory. She worked at Cedars. She's mentioned in a write-up of Tim's history in the show. It says she was a nurse, but I seem to remember she was a secretary at Cedars, working for either Ed or Sarah. (It's almost 50 years ago, so I definitely could be wrong). I'm certain she was an unwed mother. I recall reading an interview with the actress, Maureen Silliman (I looked it up, that's her correct name, LOL). She started on the show just before the Dobsons started writing it. She was shocked to get a script that said her character had been pregnant since she hit town. I remember a scene where she told Tim she was going to leave SF for a better job for her daughter's sake (really, I think she was upset he was serious about Rita). I don't remember them getting married and leaving town, but according to "Who's Who in Springfield" that's how the characters were written out. Mattson did All My Children for several years, so she might have been persuadable. Here's an interesting factoid I recently learned on these message boards: Elvera Roussel was in the running to play Delia on RH when the show first hit the air. How wild is it that Mattson played Delia for a while? (Though from what I saw of her performance, she was miscast). It's hard to know if Roussel would have been a good Delia. You'd think she would have been better suited to playing Faith Coleridge, but who knows? She didn't get to show a whole lot of range as Hope.
    • If I were to do an EON reboot, I think I would start at the beginning, with Mike Karr leaving the police force in order to begin a new career as an attorney, and dealing with his wife, Sara's, crooked family.
    • I don't know if it was the writing or performance but I felt like we finally got to see the real Ted. Especially the way he talked to Martin when confronted, felt like a completely different person. He felt darker and like a total liar who was mad he got caught. I expected him to be remorseful and want to apologize to each and every family member who he came into contact with but he seemed like he didn't care. It completely changed how I view him and it makes me wonder if this is the direction they're going to take Ted in with the recast.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy