Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

They're pretty much going to be new soaps anyway. I'm hoping if these turn a decent profit it may cause PP to create some other new soaps. I still want the 15 minute format.

If The Chew is a great idea, then they should have better promos than poor Clinton Kelly looking terrified at the camera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed. And when it comes to Julie--exactly. Traditionally when soaps have been at their best, the EP doesn't just worry about lights and budget, etc, but has a strong creative vision for the show. I get the sense that JHC, as much as actors apparently love her, has and had none for AMC. Of course part of this is Frons who seemed to want to take over much of that aspect of his EPs roles, though JFP and especially FV at their ABC shows did seem to have (for good or bad) more of a vision. But at the same time I could see PP, as you said, wanting her on at least at first because she does know the show, has a report with the actors, etc. But I would like to see someone brand new come on board (I'm less concerned with the writing if LB comes on to be honest, even if I've been mixed on this era for her).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Chew just looks and sounds so cheap to me--not like something you'd expect on network afternoon tv (well at least before Let's Make a Deal, etc). ANd I thought sporting events in primetime on US network tv were something that we were seeing much much less of (but I admit I only really follow Canadian hockey during the playoffs, sports wise, and maybe tennis, so have no clue what I'm talking about there).

The thing is, while I hate to admit I do think they have about a 50/50 chance of hitting it off, I don't thinka brand new soap on a brand new online network would attract much attention at all, except from some soap viewers like us. I think using an established one DOES make more sense--and then using those maybe to lead into brand new programming.

I actually agree--and the cable network potential pick up, aside, it is easier for people to watch something on their computer that's 15-30 mins than 60...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How is the Chew a new concept? It's freaking recipes and a bunch of perky effervescent hosts nobody ever heard of who undoubtedly will be laughing up a storm at each others anti-funny comments non-stop, feigning deep interest in minutia and pointless observations on food as it relates to "lifestyles" and all that is happening in the so-called world of food, wherever that is.

<object width="512" height="288"><param name="movie" value="

Please register in order to view this content

name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src=" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="512" height="288" allowFullScreen="true"></embed></object>

<object width="512" height="288"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/PrsYDc-rpx1foAaluro2Tg"></param><param'>http://www.hulu.com/embed/PrsYDc-rpx1foAaluro2Tg"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/PrsYDc-rpx1foAaluro2Tg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="512" height="288" allowFullScreen="true"></embed></object>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ugh it just seems so tacky to me. Like segments on a local morning news/talk show. I still hold by the Food Network comment (as well as other networks that have design, etc--speaking of didn't Nate Berkus' show tank, or is it back for a second season?) If people are really interested in cooking tips and recipes, they'll watch one of the other more thorough cooking shows. I know Rachel Ray has had success with a hybrid show but, as much as I'm not a fan, I can see her appeal more--this looks to be a weird mix that is neither fish nor fowl, to use a lame food metaphor--it doesn't even seem to have a clear concept. Everyone I know, and most of these people are non soap viewers, has commented on how off putting The Chew commercials are--though that's partly because ABC seems to play them every break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only existing personnel I think are absolutely essential at the new shows are Frank Valentini and possibly either Lorraine Broderick or Agnes Nixon, in whatever limited capacity she is willing at her age. I think they need new blood as HWs and definitely a new EP at AMC. Valentini OTOH has singlehandedly kept OLTL running in a way no one could've believed, for better or worse. I understand he is likely locked in to steward GH come 2012, but I hope he wiggles out of that. He is the definition of what an EP should be - efficient and focused on the overall show's success and survival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's funny/sad how much Daytime programming is commercials. I believe the rule is in primetime it has to be something like 41-42 mins of programming, and in daytime it is about 36 (Canada it's the same as primetime which is why they stuff the dcommercials when they air the soaps and other US daytime stuff with boring PSAs, or local news bits--we used to get a soap gossip/letter reading show between AMC and OLTL but it was replaced by a fitness/heatlh thing due to budget lol). Of course 30 years back or so I believe daytime was at least 42 mins, and primetime at least 45.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy