Jump to content

AMC and OLTL Canceled!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Behr and Nixon, particularly in 1994 to early 1995, had to work extra hard to keep McTavish's storytelling grounded... Just one case in point, AMC was on its third lookalike storyline in as many years. With that, and multiple rapes, bombs, and other random acts of violence, AMC really had deviated from its own identity to a great extent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's funny though, Behr and McTavish did seem pretty close at one point. I wonder what happened, outside of McTavish's inability to be a consistent writer?

Here's AMC's Best Show Emmy win from 1994. Behr grabs McTavish's hand and brings her to the front with her, and thanked her for the "wonderful stories."

<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/wEj86gGd200" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Whenever a soap is cancelled and TPTB give all the wherefores and whys, it's perhaps best to just cut the [!@#$%^&*] and leave out the, "Women are no longer in the home" line. You cancel two soap operas because "women are no longer in the home" to watch, yet you replace them with gynocentric cooking and weight loss shows? :blink: It's obviously not about a lack of female audience, there are still several stay-at-home moms and furthermore, several retired folks (many of whom don't have cable) who were most likely watching the soaps right along with Judges Judy and Joe Brown. It can't be about ratings, it has to be about cost. Do they honestly believe that they will ever attract a daytime audience that is not already there? Bold statement time, NO ONE is going to make a point to tune into these new shows. They will catch them if they catch them, "See ya when I see ya", or they will be watched by the same people who already had the TV on anyway. If TPTB can pull stabile numbers similar to what the soaps were pulling, even dipping a little lower, it's probably quite all right with them because these shows *allegedly* cost so much less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Regarding McTavish's response, she would probably bark what everyone is, that corporate interference in the creative end destroyed these shows. I usually don't jump on the "So and so HW killed this show" silliness, because Disney corporate and execs like Frons tweak these stories and scripts to within an inch of their lives, until they're a hollowed shell of the writer's original concept, but with her, I tend to feel that she deserves a lot of the blame. There was mass defection after the baby switch ended, and those viewers never returned. When you conceive storylines that are not only patently ridiculous, but that also insultingly rewrite history and spit in the faces of long-time fans, then you must share a huge chunk of the blame. Frons and Disney may have greenlit these stories, which is a travesty in itself, but they didn't come up with the unabortion, the fight club, Satin Slayer, poison pancakes, or being buried alive. Megan came up with those all by herself, and corporate interference or not, these foolish plots drove away a huge chunk of audience that never came back. Maybe it's pointless to play the blame game, but I think our emotions are running high now, so it's natural to want to point fingers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True, that is mind-boggling. The show fell apart very quickly when the baby switch ended, and judging from her responses during interviews, she seemed to blame the viewers, and just about everything that played out on screen seemed to be one big "f*** you" to the audience. I don't know why ABC didn't intercede earlier. They probably thought Cady's return would turn things around. That turned out to be a fiasco. Then they probably thought her unabortion idea would grab the viewers. MASSIVE IMPLOSION on that end. By the time they finally had enough and canned her, it was just too late, and the damage was done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They didn't intercede because they are just as delusional, pretty much. Instead of saying, "Well, this isn't working, we need to fix it," they said, "Well, this isn't working, and nothing can fix it." Yeah, the parade of sucky HWs followed, but that sure as hell wasn't a solution, and shame on ABC for thinking it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Loved this IG post from Ambyr about how she and Trisha work together. You can tell these ladies go above and beyond the script, and that they really trust and enjoy working together. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJpJufFPOQ2/?igsh=MXBmcWs0YzIwaXVhNA==  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • It is a shame that more characters didn't go the ATWT-Barbara route and make the ingénue into an antagonist. Sort of like they did with Liza/Hogan/Sunny, less successfully. It is a credit to ATWT's creativity that breathed life in that character for years after she was fighting off bulls in Spain.  But, a character like Liza can only have so many true loves and high jinks on the high seas.  They need another reason to be in the story. Liza's wealth, as well as her acumen to see through fraud, was fertile ground for tons of stories.  But, I feel like the business stories for Liza were always about her being easily overwhelmed, rather than exploring things like her leadership and managerial skills.
    • STFU!! Dante!!! This nonsense of blaming Gio is just ridiculous! Alexis and Lucky are becoming so unlikable. Why are the writers writing these characters so poorly?
    • Keith still comes off younger to me. I thought he wasn't that bad for his first day.
    • To be fair, they were only recently step-siblings.  Their parents married within the past few years.  And, Draper's father Ansel was not coy about the fact that he married Raven's mother, Nadine, for the money. And, Raven's sort of sticking it to April that not only can she have a baby (April has a heart condition that makes it difficult for her to carry a child to term), she could also have April's man, if she wanted him.
    • Keith D Robinson is 49. Maurice Johnson is 46.
    • I hope they give him more to do than just be a prick as you say. I can see how viewers would like him because the actor is so charming despite the character being such an absolute pain.    I would agree. And there was also the undercurrent of Raven and Draper sort of flirting with each other. The actors play that attraction and it worked so well in that scene. 
    • Daniel Cosgrove is PERFECT as the sleezy politician. This might be my favorite role of his. All of these people keeping Kristina’s secret is so annoying. I really want her to pay.
    • What did happen to Beth between 86 and 89? Did she have amnesia?
    • I actually thought he came off as younger. It's so hard to buy Martin as Nicole and Ted's son unless they had him when they were 12.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy