Jump to content

2011: The Directors and Writers Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 512
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I have a little hope it'll be Hall/Tessinari, AMC always seems to put the 'special' types of episodes in their hands...all of the inside the light stand alone episodes (except for Ericas, which Taylor wrote) were scripted/directed by them. The Stuart whodunit shooting episode. Just any episode that seemed 'special' or was really good. Not that ANY of that even means anything LOL then again they did give the 40th Anniversary ep to Taylor/Childs -__- so I think it's pretty much a given they'll write the end...but I still have a glimmer of hope it won't be them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And what was his "and Y&R was looking for other writers anyway" talk about? Basically just saying, "they were about to fire me for another recycled writer anyway"?

Casiello for Whitesell, so in other words, trading someone mediocre for someone just as mediocre? Typical Y&R.

Casiello's Y&R epsiodes were generally atrocious and disjointed when I watched. Lisa Connor also wrote episodes like that when she was there.

I will also never forget the script Casiello wrote where he had Katherine Chancellor saying the most uncharacteristic dialogue. "Cut the crap!" Really? From Katherine Chancellor?

Sinking industry or no sinking industry, he won't amount to anything writing-wise outside of soaps. Soap writers almost never have any diversity in their careers in other aspects of television.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I think that's an illusion just because you dislike them. Breakdowns are so hard to tell apart. If they didn't credit who the BDW were, you wouldn't know who did what.

For what it's worth, he didn't write that line.

What's "amount to anything?" They don't have to be super successful. Just make enough to be happy and enjoy your job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Except when they win the Academy Award. (Am I right, David Seidler?) ;-P

(And let's not forget Lawrence & Ronnie Wenker-Konner or Mark Rosenthal while we're at it.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Or maybe you're using an illusion because you like him? :huh::lol:

I do not have a fondness for him, especially when he used his Twitter to comment on certain fans of the industry. Yeah, let's talk about the same fans who keep the show you write for on the air, brilliant move...

When certain epsiodes are credited to the same writers over and over again and are a disjointed mess and have the same feel to them, I always blame the breakdown writer. I also remember a specific episode where Billy was in prison that he wrote, which I found extra insufferable.

The Billy character tended to appear a lot in the episodes Casiello wrote, which I know wasn't his doing, but I did find the character even more atrociously drawn in his episodes.

I also singled out Lisa Connor's work at Y&R, which was generally just as mismatched and disjointed. I no longer watch to judge anyone in that writing team though in its current state.

I am not the only one who has singled out his work on Y&R. I believe sheilaforever also had similar comments to mine a year or so ago.

Also, remember that interview you did with him a few years ago where he said he never understood Y&R or its tone or whatever? Well, it showed, IMO. Not that many others do on the show anymore. I will never defend Latham's writing team for example, but I did think when he wrote for it, James Stanley did some decent breakdown work.

That script was credited to him, and I do remember the dialogue in his few scripts being VERY clunky. I was not the only one to point this out in the Y&R episodes thread a few years back.

I meant making a name for yourself outside of the soap industry. How many have done it? :unsure:

I wish him well, but I'm not going to speculate on his next move, as I do not care. He can hype it on his Twitter or Facebook all he wants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

What's an example of a disjointed breakdown?

Sometime episodes are disjointed because of editing. Sometimes episodes are too short, sometimes they're too long, and sometimes 2 episodes are edited into 1.

That's fine. Some writers don't have an ear for dialogue and that's why they don't normally write scripts. But people always single out that specific line - which he didn't write.

Not many but I don't see what's wrong with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I wrote my previous post about Dante being on a 3-day rant while I was at the 30-minute mark of the show. By the end, Dante was back to being reasonable and kind and understanding of everyone and everything. OK, I get it. We all knew that sooner or later we'd get the wise Dante. The mistake was showing him berate Jason IN THE SAME EPISODE and imply he's a lousy father.
    • I think Dante has a larger GH fanbase than both Ava and Nina character wise.  Both CW and MW have a built in fanbase outside GH which isn't really indictive of the characters, IMO.
    • Just this fan's opinion but I have said these writers are the most plot opportunistic maybe ever! They will have any character say just about anything if it advances whatever plot point they have in their minds atm. I think if Dante's POV right now was defensible people would be running it up the flag pole. The fanbase thing you're describing to me it just means they're going to continue to like their fave no matter what. 
    • I think the difference between the head writer change at Days vs GH is that the day to day episode quality at GH was still lacking while the day to day episode quality has improved. And now that there appears to be some depth to the episode content... the limitations of some of the performers on Days is more apparent (i.e. Leo, Alex, Sophia, Cat). However, Rome wasn't built/rebuilt in a day so I'm waiting to see how things are in three to four months once some of the threads/stories from Ron's era are tied up/resolved.. and Ford/Cwikly's long term content kicks off
    • That would be me. hehe. Keeping track of who I liked better and how it informed what would happen from episode to episode. 
    • Hey, Mike Manning, hey!!! That shirt and those slacks are working today. lol.   Nice to have this Vanessa/Nicole scene.    Look at Kat vs Eva as a cliffhanger.   I KNEW IT, I KNEW IT, I KNEW IT!!! I KNEW SILK PRESS SHEILA WOULD SHOW UP AT NICOLE'S AT SOME POINT!!!      Another trio of cliffhangers (including Dani vs Ted...another combo today)! Friday cliffhangers indeed!!!  
    • Looking forward to hearing your perspective. Tuesday was a little... ehhh though 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And Ron sort of did like a half-assed rewrite to bring them together. Apparently, Stephanie had never met Alex until 2022, even though she already knew Sonny, Joe and Vic 
    • Friday Thoughts:    June and Hayley are going to turn out to be related, or else why the casting on June's character if not for that.  Their voices and mannerisms are similar and Marquita had mentioned in an interview that we would be finding out more about Hayley's backstory.   Tomas/Eva/Kat is for sure going to be moving full steam ahead.. and I can't wait

      Please register in order to view this content

      Dani/Bill = yawn    Bill/Smitty = Interest reeved up and we all know that means the secret involving Martin/Smitty/Anita is kicking into high gear for May sweeps. Vanessa/Nicole = A satisfying friendship scene.. and Nicole's statement about Vanessa's outside interests.. I did not see that coming Nicole/Andre = I noticed that Andre volunteered knowing about the affair, but managed to withhold the nugget of information where he had convinced Ted not to confess to Nicole. Dani/Ted = This perked my interest Nicole/Silk Press Sheila = A great way to end a Friday episode.  Sometimes grandma's soaps shouldn't be discarded, but followed. Martin/Smitty = Kat is right that Smitty is too good for Martin.. and Martin did act as though he missed his afternoon nap. Ashley/Derek = Unpopular opinion.. I actually kind of missed them.   I view their scenes as a great way to kickstart a drinking game... take a shot anytime you wonder to yourself what is the point to their characters and/or either one of them says something cringey.  You'll be guaranteed to be buzzing by the end of the episode Previews for next week: Looks like Nicole has found out about Dani/Andre's FWB set up? Kat vs Silk Press Sheila looks promising.      
    • GH isn't that character-driven a show in recent decades. I think reaction depends on whether the character has a passionate fanbase. A character like Ava always has people who will defend her and back her up, as does a character like Nina (when they used to write for Nina, anyway). Dante doesn't.
    • Go 'head, Martin!! GATHER.   Oh my goodness!!! Now we are getting Bill/Smitty. The combos today. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy