Jump to content

What will you do if they start putting meters on broadband use?


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Members

On December 21 the FCC is voting on a plan by the chair, Julius Genachowski, in which he has basically given the big telecoms a green light to start charging people on how much they do online. So someone who downloads a lot of files or watches streaming video might end up paying through the nose.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/posttech/2010/12/pay-as-you-go_internet_prices.html

I've read that this already happens in Canada, which leads to instances like some Canadian service providers jacking up prices to help keep people from watching videos on Netflix. How do those of you in Canada (or elsewhere, including here, who have this type of plan) deal with it? Do you just not watch very much Netflix or Youtube or not much downloading off itunes or wherever?

I tend to watch a lot of stuff on Youtube and had hoped to upload eventually but I guess if this becomes something you would have to pay big money for I'll just stop, and try to save the videos I enjoy so I can watch them offline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This is like cable -- they never think you can pay enough.

Stopthecap has written on this a fair amount.

http://stopthecap.com/

I think a lot of people in the US will be annoyed but there are a lot of clever little word choices and propaganda (which the media is always happy to help with) which amount to a) hey, you're paying for the bandwidth other people hog, so this saves you money! (it doesn't, as I think those with minimal Internet use still have to pay a flat amount, but they will be told they are still somehow saving) b ) those bandwidth hogs are taking up so much room on the Internet, and now that room can be used to help poor people get computers! If you don't pay through the nose then you're a selfish elitist!

Google has been trying to get involved with all this so I wonder if they will try to do something to save Youtube.

Of course if these rules had been in place years ago there might not even be a Google.

I hear a lot about Rogers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bell charges as well by how much you use monthly, but between my roommate and myself, we only ran close to our limit once when my roommate downloaded Season 1 of Castle, and I'm constantly on YouTube. We pay a total of about $33/month for that. Mind you, that's also a student rate. Regularly that service would be $45/month so...

Honestly, it's not THAT big a crimp on my internet usage, I'm always on YouTube and I'm not crying. I don't think this will mean an end to YouTube, personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do, it's 30GB/month. And honestly, that's all two people on separate computers need, even when they're online constantly. If you've only got one computer and don't download torrents, you'll be fine with that. I find it absolutely manageable, and the download speeds are excellent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks. That's interesting. It could work but then I'd have to give up the British soaps, aside from those which are sometimes put on Youtube.

I've heard some caps go up to 250 GB, but I'm not sure how much that would cost.

Who is in your avatar?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL, I told myself I'd only ever replace Amy Poehler if I could top it. Now I've got a high bar to jump. :(

It's one of the contestants from RuPaul's drag race. LOVE. IT.

But yes, back to broadband :lol:

You can probably circumvent the BBC iPlayer issues if it comes to that, but it's rather complicated. If you're watching Corrie on the other hand, I know CBC streams that on their website, so you MAY be able to pick it up via CBC.ca, though we're about 2 years behind the UK, I BELIEVE.

Regardless, here's hoping you guys don't get saddled with any stupid caps and expensive broadband. Even if it isn't crimping me in any real way, if I had to choose between watching my usage and not, the choice is obvious. Especially if you're downloading whole episodes of soaps on a regular basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Wait a minute...so you guys in the States can download as many GBs as you want? I'm with Rogers and I pay $47 (before tax) for 60 GBs a month with "Up to 10 Mbps" for downloads. And then for every GB I go over, I pay $2. What is it like over in Europe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Germany: internet flatrate without any download limits (although sometimes over-excessive down-/uploaders get their subscriptions yanked...), you pay solely for your connection. Starting at 20€ per low ADSL up to 50/60€ for 16 Mbps - prices do depend on providers. Prices do depend heavily wheather you get your internet via cable or telecom broadband.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This is (maybe) overly simplistic and nonsoapy, but Doug needs to go to Gamblers Anonymous, to deal with the addictive neurological excitement hits that gambling gives him - and which control his life. Vanessa needs to go to therapy to find ways to remain healthfully lusty and sex-positive, but to stay away from anyone who would demean her.
    • YT keeps commending GL clips to me. I discovered Kathleen Cullen was on in Christmas 1987. Was there any talk of making it permanent  or was this just a special visit? I wish they had made the visit permanent. I liked her chemistry with Grant Aleksander.  
    • I'm not sure it's as unpopular as you think.  I just think the show knew they were in a bind, and needed a proven couple for the viewers to invest in. Trying to reunite Vanessa and Ross had just failed in 87. I don't think Ed and Holly's affair was well received, as Simon and Garrett had a brother/sister chemistry. Enter Billy and Vanessa, who give you history and an out not to try and do a Josh/Reva/Billy triangle, which would've really wrecked the relationship between Josh and Billy. I'd have been ok with trying Vanessa/Ross again, and doing a Vanessa/Ross/Holly/Billy quad for a while. I hated Nadine. HATED. She had to be the most insufferable also-ran before ATWT's Julia Lindsay. This is where I wish I knew Roger's history better.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • GROSS. Michael Swan was hot back in his ATWT days. Now he's 76 and WAY past his hot years.    
    • Since she kidnapped, locked up and tried to kill her father's wife I'd say that is still a pretty big deal
    • I'm good with the gushing, too. There aren't many soap icons like John Black, and that's important to celebrate and remember. And yes, life does go on for other characters, but as they say, timing is everything. Going sky diving the day before the funeral? And during a week of shows that were so powerful emotionally? No.    
    • No. There might have been a slight pause for dramatic effect after his "death," but pretty soon after they showed him in France getting plastic surgery and getting involved with his doctor, then planning with her to bring Christina to France. (She thought he had good reason to do it; she wasn't a bad person or anything). Now that I think of it, there must have been some kind of pause before that, during the 70s. Rita was accused of killing a private patient for an inheritance when she lived in Texas. Part of the backstory was that Roger had been there, too. Not sure exactly when or how long that was.
    • I've already stated that I don't like Doug being written as this meek and submissive. It was so lame watching him leave her like that. Vanessa can divorce him, but she then needs to get her thot ass into therapy. She's not only having sex with every guy she runs into, but is now having  sex with a skeevy perv on a poker table. I'm going to give the BTG some credit here. For months, many on this board were delighting in the Vanessa/Joey flirting and what they saw as chemistry. I think we're now seeing what the writers always intended -- that Joey is a disgusting POS wannabe mobster.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy