Jump to content

Early Show Shake-Ups


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It actually WAS #2 when it was Smith and Paula Zahn (at least when those Canadian people were anchoring GMA) were there which is why I always thought they should bring back Zahn after her tenures at Fox News and CNN brought her even more recognition.

Now I could see Harry Smith doing the Evening News, that be terrific actually. I like Katie Couric and have always felt she's never been properly given a chance (because nobody is willing too), but the program has been gutted then again do we need even need a CBS Evening News anymore? The 70+ crowd is dropping like flies nowadays I think if at all Couric may as well be the last anchor of the CBS Evening News.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think they need to drop Harry Smith, he's a star. Erica Hill is also mega fierce, but I expected bigger for her. Not that The Early Show isn't big, but I expected something else. Something people actually cared about. She'll somewhat raise her profile and get a major show on her belt, but I'm sure she'd rather be on Today or GMA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There was nothing he could have done. If Harry Smith isn't taking over for Katie Couric, then this sounds like a budget cut. Get some cheaper, younger talent in and hope they pull up the ratings. But the problem is that The Early Show doesn't even TRY to be different from GMA and Today. In order to raise ratings, The Early Show needs to step outside of the box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members
I just wish Glor had been promoted to host so we can see even more of his sexy self.

When CBS News interrupted The Talk last week, I was inclined to change the channel until I saw Jeff Glor doin the Special Report. :wub:

Chris Wragge looks well, ragged. :P

And what bothers me most about this promo that they spent money to make is that it doesn't tell me why I should be watching NOW! It's just "The new crew is here. They're younger, they're hotter, they use a five year old Rooney song in their ad, they're doing fakeass Friends bullshit minus the fountain!" But what's gonna make THEM more watchable than Harry Smith, Maggie Rodriguez, and Dave Price? Is Moonves just gonna let them go all out wild and Good Day L.A.? Or is this still gonna be some kind of serious news show?

WHY should we watch? The fact that you have younger people anchoring just isn't enough. Moonves needs to trash that bitch up and have the girls hung over and the guys totally wasted or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Unpopular opinion:  The focus on the soap opera tropes over the mysteries and crimes was partly what did the show in.  Also, featuring characters not involved in the legal, police, and criminal elements also hurt the show and took away what made it unique. Featuring characters like Jody, Raven, Sky, etc hurt the show long term.  The show ABCified starting in 1976/1977 and then went through a youthification period starting in 1981.  
    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
    • It's been a while, but we have seen the foyer to Bill and Hayley's house as well as the exterior entrance to their house. The foyer was first seen in the premiere episode when Hayley met Vanessa at the house.
    • There's still a year or two before Larkin arrives. Joel is there already. EON does noticeably youthify, although I think they carry it off. Admittedly I haven't seen most of the Jody stories, which from what people here have said aren't great.
    • I don't mind the actor who plays Brian. He's fine. The problem for me is that Paige seems so wishy wishy. She doesn't seem to have much of a personality at this point so I don't see why Brian would be so besotted with her. She just lurches from one trauma to the next. Granted, it's only been a month, but she's not as vibrant as April or even Deborah who has had minimal screen time by this point.  I do worry about the influence of GH on the show since I'm in fall of 1979 and characters have conversations and there's not the drive to "youthify" the show. However, I think Marceau (sp?) is gone. He was given a rather tame sendoff. How long was the actor on the show? I hope this is not a sign of things to come. I worry the show is setting up a murder mystery around one of my favorite characters and I will be mightily annoyed. I also noticed in recent Search for Tomorrow episodes uploaded to YT that the actors playing Logan and Eliot showed up. I don't watch the show but they were in the screencaps. When does Larkin Malloy show up or has he already left? Joel Crothers hasn't shown up either unless I've blinked and missed him.
    • Dr Linden. She treated Vanessa's drug addiction (although Vanessa seemed to forget that by Henry's suicide attempt) , and she's mentioned during Reva's PPD. Although I can't recall if she's actually shown right off the top of my head. She probably was temporarily shelved when Sonni was a therapist (between her crazy times) And I think Billy sees her after he falls off the wagon after Reva's death.
    • Kinda agree. I have some issues with the sets. Nicole's living room is bland-looks like a display home. Bill and Hayley's is too small and basically hideous. And neither of them have a front door/entrance or staircase. People just appear from the corridor. Those green accents  at Uptown are way too much. Also,Naomi and Vanessa not having an office or a home .
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  That Grainger story always reads like hog-wild melodrama, not very similar to the more subtle stories for Rita in her last few years. I wonder how Lenore played the material.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy