Jump to content

Scream 4 Trailer


JackPeyton

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Oh no, I agree with you completely for once :lol: (I forgot about Red Eye). People Under the stairs is largely his script though (he even lifted bits verbatim from his Flowers in the Attic script--I guess some issues he wanted to deal with that he first thought of from there). The concept for the third one was all his--bringing back Nancy, the mental home, etc, but I concede nothing of the specific dialogue and many of the scenes were his (the more elaborate dream concept was his). Of course in a way that was the undoing of Nightmare, as a franchise--4 was the most successful movie and they took all the elements of 3 and kinda made it into this jokey fantasy (4 is actually a fun movie, in a cheezy 80s way, but 5, despite trying to go darker, and 6 are close to unwatchable IMHO). I do think, even now, New Nightmare is vastly underated. It falls a bit apart in the climax (as nearly all horror movies, and even novels--witness Stephen King--do IMHO) but otherwise... It just came a fewyears too soon, when no one wanted a new Nightmare movie, no matter how smart.

Shocker's downfall was Wes' own cynicism (something he's owned up to). He was pissed off that he had virtually no rights or money from Freddy Krueger, so set out to create a new version of him. I think it's an utter dissaster (I know some fans think it deserves re-evaluation, but I don't :P ). Ironically, Rachel Talelay (sp?) who directed Nightmare 6 (which I remember thinking was so bad the first time I saw it I actually kept falling asleep) later did Ghost in the Machine, an awful horror film that cribs a lot from Shocker.

Horror directors seem to fall prey to being deeply inconsistent more than a lot of other directors (Wes Craven is often mentioned in the same breath as John Carpenter who has made some truly dreadful, nearly completely forgotten films). It is interesting going back to some ofthe films Wes did for money though (again, something he always owns up to, to be fair). I think some of his earlier mainstream work like Deadly Blessing is actgually quite good (Sharon Stone is atrocious in it--you would have never guessed she could become a star). I admit I don't really have the stomach to get into his early exploitation work like Hills Have Eyes and Last House--I've seen them (didn't bother with the remakes) and I admit they have a raw power, they're just not my thing.

Then you get oddities like his tv movie work (done for money) like that camp classic with Susan Lucci as a spa owner/robot/satan whatever she was (Invitation to Hell or something? I should get that on DVD lol).

And when Nightmare was a surprise megahit, he was hired for big bucks to make his first mainstram movie--Deadly Friend. I don't put much blame on that on Wes--he was hired because of his name, but the script he was given was a variation on the oh so popular at the time "best robot buddy" 80s movie (Flight of the Navigator, Short Circuit, etc)--with more comedy and "warmth" than horror. It tested horribly, appatrently audiences wanted a HORROR film from Wes Craven's name (no kidding--even Wes apparently didn't want to do the script at first), and expected another Nightmare. So suddenly they reshot endless horror dream sequences, gory deaths, a lot of it wasn't even shot with Wes' knowledge--the infamous, awful, ending scene (check it out on youtube) wsa reportedly directed by the exec producer, and scripted by him.

Anyway, my point is part ofhis mixed track record is his own doing, part is bad luck with studios(let's not get into the Cursed debacle). I guess I hoped with more control My Soul to Take would go back to the original Nightmare. But I know it had many studio problems too (even recently--Wes was VERY against the idea of them making it 3D after the fact, even urging anyone who saw it to just see the 2D showing). But what was disappointing to me was, despite maybe 2 scenes with genuine potential and interesting dream imagery (something Wes usually excels at)--like that water bit--Wes Craven just seems bored, and apathetic. It's not even a shockign disaster in the way something like Deadly Friend is.

So... maybe with a good script and the bhuge studio support behind him, he will step up to the plate with Scream 4. I don't really blame him for Scream 3 (though surely he realized thatthe increased focus on comedy was a mistake)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed. I do appreciate that he's admitted his huge downfall post Scream 2/Dawson's Creek was he couldn't say no to anyone, so agreed to every project handed to him and never really focused on any of them (he also seems to regret leaving Dawson's for other projects so soon). He has also admitted that there was never really much thought about a trilogy when he conceived the original movie--a line of bullshit the studio used to always cart out, that never rang true.

Hahaha, when this Scream 4 trailer came out I tried to even remember who the killer was in Scream 3 and how it tied into the past movies, and simply couldn't. I know they wrote several endings, but still I remember being utterly baffled in the theatre--but what really turned me off of it was just how goofy it was--the cameos from Silent Bob and Jay, etc--it was like some really lame fanboy made it and not a movie that involved so many of the original cast members.

That's more than fair enough, and I admit if it turns out to be like that (that's all I wanted from Soul to Take), then I can accept that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is why despite my love of horror and slashers, I'm not a very good "gorehound". For me these movies need a hero (well, since clashers almost always use the "final girl", complete with things like the final girl often has a more asexual name so male audience members can identify more with her and other odd cliches Kevin Williamson nailed perfectly, I guess I mean heroine). What derailed Halloween, etc, and made the series less mainstream and more something only obssessed fanboys(girls) were into was precisely that. The hero of the movie wasn't Michael Myers, it was Laurie (that's why her returnin H20 made it such a hit, and why so many were pissed off that they killed her in the opening scene of the next one--it kinda makes her whole struggle for three films pointless). Friday the 13th of course never was really strong or had any well done characters so it made sense for Jason to become the hero). Same with Elm Street--Nancy is a character most audiences cared about (her death in 3 was well done though).

Scream was a success cuz it was a *smart* slasher, but also because it didn't treat all its characters with contempt--people the audience would cheer when they were dead. I don't have much interest in following Sydney's stuggle and ability to overcome that stuggle, only to have her finally killed off--call me a sentimentalist. Yeah it's boring if you knwo a character won't die, but it could also just come off as cheap.

If she was smart--and I honestly think she may be heding in this direction, she'd do mainstream stuff like this to keep her in the public eye and get some moolah--and use it to do the indie films that make no money that she clearly most wants to do (Altman'sunderated ballet film, The Company, was all her idea, for instance).

It was a good idea that was just given WAY too much screentime--again making the movie much more of a (kinda lame) comedy than a horror with comic/knowing elements...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh and I can't believe Kruger was hired again to rewrite this after Scream 3... Yes, he's done some good (and some bad) work since, but... Ugh.

OK one more negative comment from me and then I'll shut up (for a bit :P )

These are the new rules:

Rules of a horror movie sequel (Scream 4)

These rules are explained by Robbie and Charlie during a class in which Sidney is present.

1."The Kills have gotta be way more extreme."

2."The unexpected is the new cliche."

3."Virgins can die now."

4."To be the new version, you know, 2.0? The killer should be filming the murders." ("It’s the natural next step in psycho slasher innovation").

Ummm isn't all this like 5+ years too late? Virgins have been dieing in horror films for a while, treating the unexpected as the new cliche and wallowing int he expected for scares has also been done, and God knwos the killer filming the murders isn't new...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I did like that it was more of a thriller. For a trilogy it felt like each film had a nice progression and can stand on it's own. I was reading an interview with Wes Craven who said when shooting the film post-Columbine the studio didn't want any blood and it was a big fight getting that in. It's obvious there was a mandate somewhere because in that regard it wasn't nothing like the first two. Had the killer been better decided I think the movie would've been better. But then who should be the killer? I always thought those young Maureen pics looked like Rose McGowan and maybe they could've done the same twist with her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One thing I will say is I wish they had used Randy's sister more. And then going into this new film, maybe she could've been included or Patrick Dempsey's character just so we have more familiar faces to interact with the old crowd (and easier to kill off).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm hoping most of Williamson's script is still in somehow - Ehren Kruger's Scream 3 is unwatchable dreck. Even 2 is not that great, given that it was rewritten on the fly after the superior original draft leaked onto the Net (in which just about everyone dies).

Neve Campbell is not much of an actress and never has been - execs at Miramax have even admitted such in print, "sweet girl [who] can't act her way out of a paper bag." I never liked Sidney much. I hope she gets offed finally. But if Campbell used her money from her heyday to keep Altman making films, I applaud her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Scream 2 script I found was terrible. I like some of the ideas, but it was a little too cheesy. And four killers? Geez thats a lot lol. Had they gone with that script, Scream 3 would've been a completely different animal. May not have been possible since everyone died except Cotton. I'm thankful for whoever leaked that! lol

Right now I'm still waiting on my DVDs of this trilogy to arrive! Can't wait.

Scream 2 original script: http://www.imsdb.com/scripts/Scream-2.html

Differences: Mickey is a strong supporter of Sidney; Cici has a different death similar to Casey (originally all the people murdered had names similar to the victims of the first film); Hallie, Derek, Debbie and Cotton are the killers; Gale, Dewey and Sidney all die.

Also I read that originally (and both are unproven rumors) that for Scream 3 Dewey was meant to be the killer and another rumor stats it was Angelina and Roman.

ETA:

That website also has a very different early draft of Ethan Kruger's Scream 3 script. The opening is similar, but doesn't include Cotton and takes place at the Hollywood sign. I prefer what made it to screen in this case. One thing I notice is that the script is very gory. That pretty much confirms for me the lack of gore was studio mandated, although Kruger gets the blame for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My Scream trilogy finally arrived, but I haven't dug into it yet. While I was waiting I bought I Know What You Did Last Summer and it's two trilogies. I watched "I'll Always..." first since I'd never seen it. It's pretty much a remake with supernatural elements, but it has potential. The budget was large enough they could've made a decent film with a better script and director. The script is painfully dull in parts. Too much of the film is spent on the unmemorable characters talking in circles and they never build any suspense. The kills are good but thats it.

I also re-watched the original, another Williamson gem. I know it gets lots of flack, but I think this is a fabulous film. It has some of the most memorable action sequences in horror film and I thought the script was great. It doesn't feel like a copy of Scream, but obviously from the Scream era. The cast is great, particularly Sarah Michelle Gellar and Jennifer Love Hewitt. Instead of the obvious supercouple thing with Ray, I wish they'd kept both female characters for future sequels. It probably would've done the series some good. Brandy is not a suitable replacement for Buffy Summers lol. But I will say the entire sequence that leads to Helen's death is an absolute classic.

I'll return with my thoughts on the Scream films once I get to them. It's been years since I've seen any of them, but probably the longest since I've seen Scream 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Download isn't working for me either.  With that said, thank you for all the work you have done!
    • @P.J. Well, it wasn't her first award. I am sure she has written books, and spoken at colleges, and gotten some notoriety from it. Most importantly, she is fulfilled. Something Dani is not.  @Paul Raven Exactly, it does not ring true to me. Dani has that big personality because she is masking pain. And she probably clung to Bill because he made her feel smart and important (at one point). There are ways to add more layers to her.
    • Absolutely. And IIRC Rose Alaio has mentioned production having it out for her.
    • That goes back to Chance/Abby-there was way more to explore with their marriage but the first problem that pops up that's pretty much it-moving on. And Kyle/Lola, years worth of story dropped so he can fall back in love with Summer. Sharon/Rey married off with no plans for their future so they kill him off. And so on...
    • All of that would be interesting. Why would JG ever do that?
    • GH 1976 Pt 2 Medical student Bobby Chandler’s bone-marrow test results are in, and Steve Hardy has the difficult task of telling him he has Malenkov’s Disease, a rare and fatal blood disease. Bobby, newly married Samantha, hears his one-year-maximum prognosis and insists that Steve not tell anyone, as he has to have time to work out his own feelings. To cover up the treatments he’ll be starting immediately, Bobby, with Steve, decides to tell his family he has mononucleosis. His wife and his mother, Caroline, accept this story, but attorney Lee Baldwin senses it’s much more and presses Bobby for the truth, then promising to keep Bobby’s secret. Even though Bobby moves into a state of remission, Lee realizes the gravity of the problem and moves his wedding to Caroline forward, assuring Bobby that he will always be there for both Caroline and Sammi. But Bobby’s remission is short-lived, and his symptoms are now more severe, requiring frequent whole-blood transfusions. And a new experimental drug he is taking holds the threat of serious side effects. Sammi learns that Bobby’s attempt to buy life insurance was turned down and, herself a nurse, realizes that his symptoms are more severe than mono. She tries to press Leslie for the truth, but Leslie can’t violate a patient’s confidence. She does, however, pressure Bobby to let Sammi share is with him. Bobby insists that he can’t; he won’t send her into mourning while he’s still there to watch. But Sammi, angry at being treated like a child, presses the issue and manages to find out the truth. She then asks Lee to convince Bobby that his mother must be told so they can all show him the love they have for him before it’s too late and they have only  regrets for what went unsaid. Lee agrees, and after the wedding he protectively tells Caroline the truth. Sammi then tells Bobby that she is pregnant, news that he receives with very mixed emotions. Steve hits an optimistic note when he tells Bobby that a new breakthrough in leukemia chemotherapy may help him in his fight for life. This new treatment calls for more extensive testing, and Steve is overjoyed to find that there has been a variation in Bobby’s condition which indicates that he -doesn’t have Malenkov’s Disease after all. His condition, while serious, can be successfully treated  extensive drug therapy in New York, and Lee quickly arranges for all of them to move there so they can support Bobby during the extensive treatment and long recovery.  Dr. Jim Hobart and his wife, Audrey, are continuing their therapy sessions, trying to decide if they have a future together. Audrey admits she has stayed with Jim only because he needed her while he was drinking, and he in turn admits that he knows Audrey married him not out of love but out of gratitude for saving her son Tommy’s life in surgery. When Jim finally tells Audrey that he created his own alcoholic abyss and blamed her only because she was conveniently close, she wonders what will happen to: her when he recovers. If he doesn’t need her, can she go on? Does she need so much to be needed? When Jim, improving, starts teaching at the local college, he finds his self-image improving. But Audrey, worn out from therapy, suggests that she take a short vacation alone. Jim sees this as a way of undermining his recent strides and is angry. He relates this situation to his recent impotence, caused by his emotional problems. Jim reacts to his own feelings of inadequacy by withdrawing from Audrey, treating her impersonally and coldly. She takes this as an indication of her own failure. But when Jim reacts enthusiastically to one of his students, lovely young Sally Grimes, Audrey questions her own responsibility for the situation and accepts a dinner invitation with Steve Hardy, her first husband. Steve’s reassurance that she’s been a paragon of tolerance is negated when Jim walks in late and showing signs of drinking. When she asks how he could do it, he bitterly replies, “It’s a way to help me escape from you,” and turns and leaves. He goes to Sally’s, where they make love. When Sally later expresses regret at interfering in his marriage, Jim assures her there was nothing left to spoil—his wife is frigid but has blamed their sexual failure on him; thanks to Sally, he now knows he’s not inadequate. Since Sally won’t have an affair with a married man, Jim decides to make the break with Audrey. He bit- _ terly tells her Sally proved to him that he never had a problem—all he needed was a real woman, not one who was all burned out. He scathingly says that she takes men and castrates them; cases in point, her three husbands: Steve Hardy, Tom Baldwin, and himself. Shocked and horribly hurt by his accusations, Audrey swallows sleeping pills but immediately realizes the folly of her actions and tries to get help. Steve, meanwhile, senses something wrong and on a hunch goes to her apartment, where he finds her unconscious. He rushes her to the hospital for treatment, and after sixteen hours she begins to come around. She tearfully repeats Jim’s accusations while still groggy, and Steve reassures her that nothing Jim said was in any way true. As she dozes in the security of his presence, he whispers to her, “There’s a lot of woman in you, there was and there is, my sweet, lovely Audrey.”  Nurse Beth Maynard, despite her frequent pronouncements that she’s immune to emotional involvement, has fallen in love with resident Kyle Bradley. Beth’s sister, Nurse Diana Taylor, feels that Kyle treats Beth as if she were a casual conquest, however, rather than a woman he loves. Kyle’s life is now complicated by the arrival of Nurse Kate Marshall in town. She is staying with her godmother, Jessie Brewer, R.N., while. she recovers from a painful divorce. She and Kyle had an affair a few years ago, and she knows he’s married but keeps his wife “under wraps.” Kyle, in turn, knows that the discovery of Kate’s affair with Dr. John McAllister drove his wife to suicide. Kyle and Kate resume their affair. Despite the fact that Kyle is now living with Beth, Diana has seen enough to convince her that Kyle is deceiving her sister. But Beth won’t believe this, until she sees them embracing herself. When she confronts Kate, Kate bitterly tells Beth everything past and present about herself and Kyle, including the interesting fact that he’s married. Beth, shocked and hurt, throws Kyle out, and Jessie, who overheard Kate’s vindictive diatribe to Beth, arranges her transfer to another hospital.     
    • This is so true - the instant love is annoying. Adam/Sally/Billy/Chelsea are the best evidence of why this rings hollow. While I can see Adam/Chelsea reuniting based on a long history and Connor, there's no way Sally would instantly declare love. While Billy is just a desperate soul, Sally would be far more cautious after what happened with Adam. The *real* Sally would not only scheme to get Adam back, but make Chelsea's life difficult. She just got over it and gave up. Please. Instead of insta-love why can't some of these characters more casual? I hope Claire flings with Holden after Kyle falls into Audra's trap. Abby turns to Nate when Devon obsesses over Amanda - even if she's not in town. Lauren turns to Jack during this Michael stress, who in turn lands in Diane's web. We need messy triangles/quads and more.
    • Literally looks like a damn VFA or bingo hall. But we’re supposed to believe high rollers go there.
    • More 1976 LOL Carrie is very afraid that Ian’s paying her bills will force Arlene into a relationship with him she doesn’t want. She asks Joe if there’s some way to give Ian  back the money. Joe tells Arlene that her mother’s afraid of the situation, but Arlene assures him that the only thing she fears is that Tom will find out and think she’s more than a friend to Ian. Betsy, understandably resentful of Arlene, can’t see what her brother sees in her and is upset to see Arlene with Ian, as she’s sure Tom will be hurt. Tom is initially quite angry when he happens to learn that Ian paid Carrie’s hospital bills in full but believes Arlene when she assures him Ian’s just a friend. Ian, meanwhile, after Arlene admits she has strong feelings for a young doctor and can therefore regard Ian only as a friend, puts the pieces together and makes an appointment to see Tom for a cardiac examination. Tom realizes why Ian has chosen him and refuses a considerable fee to become Ian’s personal physician. . Betsy has suggested that Tom not ask Arlene to Meg’s formal New Year’s Eve party for the sake of all concerned. Meg, while having Carrie alter her party dress, mentions she’s being escorted by a wealthy man but doesn’t mention Ian by name. Ian had asked  Arlene to fly to Mexico with him for the New Year, but she declined, explaining she had another date. Tom, seeing how left out she feels, tells Arlene they are going to Meg’s party after all, and she begins looking for a dress, unable to afford the type of smashing creation she really wants. Ian, learning that Arlene’s  looking for a dress suitable for Meg’s party, arranges to have a designer creation sent in place of the off the rack dress she selected. When it arrives, Arlene and Carrie immediately plan to return it, but, on second thought, Arlene decides it wouldn’t hurt if she wore it just this once.  Ben Harper is released from prison, and Betsy tries - to show him they have nothing left between them by dating Jamie. However, her feelings for Ben get in the way of her enjoying Jamie’s company. Jamie has decided to accept an out-of-town law firm’s offer and, before leaving, helps Diana arrange the passport requirements for her newly arranged missionary trainee post in Peru. Diana tells Jamie she’s finally found peace except for her sadness at having to leave Johnny  behind. Beaver Ridge has continued to deteriorate since Rick left Meg in control, and Jamie warns Rick that since he owns fifty-one percent of the club, he’ll have to come up with fifty-one percent of the money needed to put the place back on its feet. Cal has mentioned to Rick that she would rather have a smaller, more informal home than his imposing house, and when she learns he’s put the house on the market she assumes he’s considering her desire for an easier home to run. Rick is determined that Cal not know the full extent of his financial problems. Since she wants it so badly, Rick promises Cal he’ll buy the mill house as their home, but he refuses adamantly to accept money from her trust fund toward the purchase, recalling the trouble resulting from the last time he borrowed  money from a woman—her mother, Meg.  Ian informs Ray that he'll get his cut of Beaver Ridge only when he, Ian, has the controlling interest.  When Rick can’t raise his share of the Beaver Ridge capital, he approaches Ray for help. Ray sends him to Ian, who refusés to make a loan, explaining it’s his firm policy, but suggests he pay one hundred thousand ~ dollars for two percent of Rick’s holdings in Beaver Ridge, thus transferring majority ownership to himself. Rick thinks it over and realizes he has no choice but to accept. He hates losing control of Beaver Ridge but  feels his first responsibility is Cal and he must protect her from his financial worries. Ben has moved in with Van and Bruce, explaining to Meg that he wants no help and no coddling, he has to make it on his own. He manages to find a job as a salesman in a sporting-goods shop, despite his parole. Betsy hires Carrie as Suzanne’s baby sitter in order to be absent when Ben visits his daughter. Ben finally tells Betsy he’d hoped there was still a chance for them despite everything but her dating Jamie and avoiding him seems to mean he was mistaken. Betsy admits she’s no longer seeing Jamie and agrees to be home when Ben visits. They then call a truce and decide to attend Meg’s party together.  
    • A few years after my grandfather and great aunt passed away, my grandmother married her widowed brother-in-law. You could have knocked us all over with a feather when they told us. My point is: it happens in RL, a lot more often than people think. In the Jack/Siobhan case, it would have been super messy, which is exactly what you want on a soap. Putting Siobhan with Joe forced them to write her as very naive and gullible, which seemed totally wrong for the character they initially introduced. I liked Rose, too, but that story also got derailed by the stupid mob stuff.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy