Jump to content

Moonves: "Now, there is nothing that Katie Couric is saying that everybody doesn’t know already."


bellcurve

Recommended Posts

  • Members

https://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/cbs-ceo-les-moonves-talks-candidly-about-the-future-of-broadcast-news-katie-courics-contract_b33916

CBS CEO Les Moonves spoke at the University of Texas Monday, where he accepted an award and addressed students.

While there, he commented candidly on the future of broadcast journalism, and the nightly newscasts in particular.

Among other things, Moonves said that the format of the nightly evening newscasts needs to change–and it will happen sooner rather than later.

He said that he could see the evening newscasts structured more like ABC’s “Nightline,” with an in-depth look at one or two subjects, or like the Sunday morning shows, with a round-table of panelists.

Why change them? It is too expensive to support the newscasts as it stands now, and by the time 6:30 PM rolls around, potential viewers already know the days news.

“People are getting the news elsewhere,” he said. “When there were only three networks, you did have that public service component, where we were informing America. Now, there is nothing that Katie Couric is saying that everybody doesn’t know already.”

He also talked about Couric’s nearly $40 million contract:

“The Katie Couric deal will be the last big deal of that kind ever done. … Those days are over, because the news no longer generates the kind of revenue or success that’s worth doing [those contracts].”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think he has a point, but I also think that the news broadcasts of old could have survived if they did not hire such fake, shallow people as anchors, like Katie Couric and Brian Williams. They ooze faux-sincerity and are so desperate to condescend to viewers. The conservative viewers they crave are not interested, the liberal viewers are repulsed, and the mainstream viewers think it's all fake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She's also been in the news business for a long time, primetime news, so people know her.

I guess Brian Williams counts as a success but I just have no use for him and his pandering and biases.

I never will understand why CBS thought hiring Katie was a great idea. She lost most of her charm a long time ago and has never done anything major outside of morning TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was rather fond of Brokaw. Hell, even Rather was better than the hacks we have today.

I personally wish CBS would replace Katie with Uncle Bob. Uncle Bob was so awesome when he was interim after Dan Rather left in disgrace. He even raised the ratings!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I liked Brokaw, too. Rather always came across as thisclose to have a rant on air, like there was this anger he was trying to suppress. But I can't deny he *WAS* CBS Evening News for 30 years.

Whenever anybody refers to Katie Couric as a "journalist," I have to laugh. Cronkite was a journalist. Bubba Wubba was a journalist. Andrea Mitchell is a journalist. Couric is barely an anchorwoman. She's a spokesmodel. A spokesmodel that somebody in PR felt would appeal to "middle America."

Bob Schieffer? He's awesome. But no doubt some yahoo at CBS doesn't feel he appeals to the youth demos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also liked Brokaw. And he was pretty easy on the eyes as well. But he was good on the today show as well as anchoring the news. Katie Couric IS a joke. They seemed to think she was Jane Pauley for the next generation, but they TOTALLY overestimated Couric's appeal:

Please register in order to view this content

Doesn't 70's Brokaw kind of remind you of Anderson Cooper? Just something about the way he speaks and carries himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Face the Nation is #2 in demos, households, and total viewers. I think people trust Uncle Bob and have for years.

If Andy Rooney were ever to leave us(and I hope he doesn't), Uncle Bob would be great delivering a final thought on 60 Minutes. He's not nearly as cantankerous as Andy Rooney, but he's just as engaging. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Brokaw's voice was made for broadcast journalism. It's so refreshing to see somebody deliver the news in a factual, clear way without all the "look at me!" mannerisms and editorializing that passes for newsanchorship today. And Jane Pauley was a proper, respected journalist, too, every bit Tom's equal. LOL at the frankly awesome background music and the headlines regarding whether children should be branded legitimate or illegitimate on their birth certificates. God bless the 70s.

"Women in White. A sizzling miniseries. Thursday at 9 on NBC." Love it!

alphanguy, did you hear that Anderson Cooper is recording a pilot talk show as a timeslow rival to The View and The Talk? Possibly on NBC?

I *love* Bob S and I can only hope that CBS don't start getting hung up on that 12-19 year old girls demo and start sniffing around Justin Bieber to host Face the Nation and Sing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, I heard about Anderson's pilot... It will be interesting to see. He's not exactly a font of personality, I wonder if he'll be able to carry a show that's not based on hard news. But it may be that his personality is just not showing in what he's done up to now. It will remain to be seen. I remember watching the Supertrain premiere.. it was a cool concept, and something for an 11 year old kid to get really excited about, but BOY did it lay an egg. And I don't think I watched the second episode. But luckily, Knots Landing came along a few months after that and gave me something to keep me riveted for the next 14 years. NBC was really CRAP during that period in their history, and was a joke among TV viewers, especially after CBS hd just come off a stellar decade filled with Programs prdoced by MTM and Norman Lear, I think I only watched BJ and the Bear at this time on NBC.. luckliy in a year or two, NBC would make a comeback with some great sitcoms. But back to Anderson, I was stunned to find out he's only 18 months older than me.. that hair makes him look SO much older. And I don't see much hope for Katie Couric when her contract is up. I still watch nightly news, and LOVE nightline... and am thankful that I can get KMIZ ABC-17 reliably at night since the digital transition, so I can see Nightline at 10:30 PM, instead of 12:30 AM that I had been stuck with in the past from KMBC in Kansas City. And when it comes to the nightly news, I'm sorry, but Diane Sawyer just annihalates any other competition in my mind. She speaks with dignity, knowledge, authority... she asks questions that I want answers to. No other anchor on television today can compare to her. She's as good as Cronkite, IMO. I loved Barbara Walters, too.. but my problem with Barbara, is that she never seemed to ask the RIGHT questions. I see what everybody means about Couric appearing "fake"... Jane Pauley came across as a genuine personality and a true journalist. Couric is just the "Corky Sherwood" of network news. And for the love of God... did you all hear about Hasselbeck getting a new stint on GMA? Man... ABC it great in the eveningsm but total CRAP in the mornings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If Hasselback were a left-wing loudmouth, I would STILL say the same thing: her kind of tearful, emotional editorializing has NO place on a news show, whether it is GMA or the 6.30pm network news. The View is different because it actively draws out different opinions. But I don't want that woman yapping her "cunvicshuns" at me first thing in the morning. I don't want her screaming and crying every time her co-anchorperson or interviewee questions her reasoning. Even if she had more than one braincell to rub together, i still wouldn't want to know her opinion. I liked the fact that I could never guess Jane Pauley, Walter Cronkite and Tom Brokaw's political leanings back in the day. I'm still not sure about Diane Sawyer or Barbara Walters. I'm guessing most journalists on the Big 3 networks lean more towards the Democrats, but who knows? I just want them to present me with a couple of facts, maybe an interview or two, and let me make up my mind as far as it is possible to do so in this heavily-controlled, corporate-dominated infotainment universe.

As for Anderson Cooper (yummy, though I know he's lost to the female sex, sigh), I think he should plenty of personality when he subbed in for Regis with Kelly Whatshername. He dissed Dina and Ali Lohan -- fist pump -- and has the most adorable little giggle. Pair him up with a brainy fag hag and maybe some hot male ass and you've got an Anderson Cooper talk show, as far as I'm concerned. Can't wait til he interviews Dina LoBitch. Let that inner attack dog out, Andy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That would be a good idea for a premise for Anderson's show. He might have an inner bad boy just waiting to get out, there *have* been the occasional rumors of recreational drug use and him doing anyhting with a dick.... but who knows if that's true. It will definately be something i'll want to check out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • And Kevin Mambo beat Shemar Moore for those two Emmys. I chalk up the wins to the voters not wanting Jonathan Jackson to eventually end up with a five peat (he won 1995, 1998, 1999). These were the 1996 and 1997 Younger Actor races. 1996: Nathan Fillion, Jonathan Jackson, Kevin Mambo (winner), Shemar Moore, Joshua Morrow 1997: Steve Burton, Jonathan Jackson, Kevin Mambo (winner), Shemar Moore, Joshua Morrow
    • https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/legacyremembers/denise-alexander-obituary?pid=209074143
    • Today's episode was excellent. Clearly it was confrontation day and they didn't disappoint. I'm glad they didn't forget Mona in all of this and gave us an opportunity to see how she's dealing with this. A major highlight for me were the Kat and Martin scenes. Their chemistry is off the charts and I don't understand why we haven't gotten more of this. I love how they take turns calming each other down. They feel really well matched and believable as siblings. Speaking of siblings, they anvils were dropping strong that Kat and Eva are twins but I do wish someone would mention that they are essentially hood twins which might throw people off the scent.  I'm one of the people who enjoyed Joey and the gambling storyline so it was nice to see him again. It was nice to see different characters like Mona and Eva in that element instead of the usual players. When Doug arrived I don't know what hit me but I just see a funeral in his future. He seems so hopeless and has the worst luck. I just can't see him surviving the year at this rate.
    • In fiction there has become an expectation by some that every Black character should represent excellence and perfection. It's not like we are talking about a Tyler Perry show where none of the characters are happy and everyone hates each other with a passion.
    • And on rewatch, I could've done without the unsubtle praising Matt like he was the only one who ever accepted Van as she was...but TPTB and their agendas.  It was totally in character for Vanessa to shut down emotionally until she was alone. While she could be volatile, both she and Henry believed in keeping emotions private.  Thank God it's still Bryan Buffinton in the role for both Henry's and HB's funerals. It just wouldn't have been the same with Ryan Brown, who couldn't act his way out of a wet paper bag. Roll My Eyes.
    • I can probably believe the Spauldings reacting that way, as Alan barely cares about anyone but himself and maybe his family, while Amanda only had that one experience with the Coopers, but I see your point. I do think 1997 was a better year than the last 3-4 before it, for whatever that's worth. You are right about Marcus. Kevin Mambo winning two Emmies (the latter during periods where he had nothing to do) helped.
    • I think @Darn @Faulkner and others have a fair point re: it being an unfortunate look and coincidence. I can see their point about the two Black husbands in rapid succession, without much time in between. Frankly, based on the early casting notices I thought before the show's debut (and I still suspect) that Ted's crimes might be far worse than infidelity or a secret baby. That would've mixed it up more. It's a soap, people are going to cheat, but it might've given them more variety if Nicole was stepping out first. Still, I wouldn't trade the Leslie/Eva reveal material for anything right now. Still, Fanfic Account #3 is just looking for any weapon to attack the show for not accepting his unsolicited scripts. When it's not the husbands it's Martin, or Chelsea or Dani. He's seething it got renewed.
    • I'm pretty sure Lucy and Bridget never even have another scene together for the rest of the time they're both on the show. Bridget isn't even invited to the wedding! The lack of community feeling and continuity of non-romantic relationships during this period is very jarring. Characters suddenly only seem to interact with a handful of other characters, rather than characters across the canvas. I'm deep into 1997 in my watch right now and find that it's even stranger because the show goes back and forth between ignoring history in order to manufacture some kind of separation between characters (for example, at one point Amanda refers to the Coopers as a family that the Spauldings "barely know," despite her and Alan spending the better part of 1996 going to war with Buzz over 5th street, and Alan has absolutely no reaction when he finds out about something bad that's happened to Abby, which seems pretty out of character given how close they were in 95/96) and ignoring history in order to create a sense of community that doesn't quite fit (characters who couldn't stand Amanda are suddenly acting all buddy buddy with her). The wheels really feel like they're coming off in 1997 (although I know some would argue that the wheels started to come off years earlier). Watching the Marcus/Dahlia romance again from a 2025 perspective is so weird. Marcus is a full grown man who must be at least in his mid-20s and he's dating a teenager who is not only still in high school, but is still fully a year away from graduation, and no one says anything about how creepy that is. I feel like the buzz around Marcus gave the illusion that the show was more invested in him than it ever actually was. Even during his "big" story where he's arrested for Cutter's murder, he actually doesn't appear on screen very often. He's imprisoned, Griffin is brought on, other characters make a fuss about trying to get him out, but there's a long stretch of time where he doesn't appear at all. I've been keeping episode counts while I watch and between Cutter's death in mid-November of 1995 and the end of the year Marcus/Mambo only appears 7 times (and of that only twice in December).
    • The letter reading was very emotional, and Maeve really got to me too. I was a little worried because Vanessa doesn't give a speech at the funeral, which surprised me, but then we got the private letter reading and her true emotional reaction and I was satisfied there. The YouTube channel I watch these episodes on (if not on our Vault), also had upset commenters talk about how Nola's line about Henry not accepting her at first/seen as a gold-digger was totally untrue. It's sad the writers don't do their homework and give fans the respect (and the characters respect). And yep, Bill got up and spoke at the funeral too, which was nice.  I didn't even realize that was Sharon Leal until you said it!  I had to Google it. I loved Sharon Leal in Boston Public back in the day haha. LOL at your Reva/Josh ALWAYS commentary. What is RME though?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy