Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


edgeofnik

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I do hope the writers chosen will be up to the task of adult, layered, nuanced writing.

Some of the names announced so far fill me with unease and/or foreboding, but I hope I am proven wrong and there ends up being quality writing involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2970

  • DramatistDreamer

    1958

  • Soapsuds

    1716

  • P.J.

    823

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Every single character on YR and BB is either upper-middle class or filthy rich.  They are dressed to the nines and with not a hair out of place.  It's completely unrealistic and unrelatable.  Viewers don't want yet another soap that shows excess and corporate takeover storylines.  We want a soap about real people struggling with real problems.  I'll be tuning in to "The Gates" but I'm worried it will be more of the same.  Glam, Botox, and name brand clothes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even the name sounds like its a "Real Housewives" show..not a soap.  It would have been interesting for them to center this in an urban neighborhood going through gentrification and show the push and pull with a multiethnic cast. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

From the promotional material available so far, BTG does appear to be focused on glam, high fashion, gaudy excess, and at least one petulant vixen with an attitude problem. It might be an advertising ploy, however, to attract a certain type of audience (fans of over-the-top 1980s' soaps and todays "Housewife" nightmares). TPTB tend to underestimate the intelligence of the audience, and dumb down everything to the lowest-common denominator.

The actual show may be much deeper than the shallow images we are being given so far.

I am hoping for the best, but if it ends up being slap-fights, tiaras, tantrums and glitz, without real and meaningful human characters and storylines, I think many people are weary of seeing that sort of show, and yet another one will be a hard sell.

I would prefer that as well: having a solid mixture of haves and have nots, with a multi-ethnic and realistic-looking group of actors, dealing with identifiable issues.

I guess we will soon see what the show turns out to be.

Fingers crossed.

The more successful this show is, the better it will bode for the future of daytime soaps.

I'm jaded from decades of mismanagement by the executives, but I really do want this show to be a winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think there is a wallowing in unreality now that affects all forms of entertainment. You look at The Substance, which was hyped based on a cautionary tale of wanting to remain young and beautiful, but most of the talk ended up being about how hot the actresses were. You look at SNL, a show that for many years had a large number of "normal" looking cast members, but in the last 10-15 years increasingly is populated by attractive, slim figures. Then there's Ozempic and Ozempic brothers and sisters, which have dangerous side effects and are meant to be used with caution, being pushed on everyone to help "prove" that if you don't have six-pack abs and a nonexistent waist, you are just a lazy pig. 

The move to HD also seemed to put more of an end to a grittiness or reality anywhere on TV. 

ATWT always had its share of glamorous figures, even in its earliest years, but there was a sense of the everyday and an emotional weight.

I'm not really expecting anything out of Beyond the Gates - as soon as I heard Guza, Ron Carlivati, etc. were involved I checked out mentally - but I would like to believe the show can capture some of those elements and won't just end up choking on more camp or going the way of Tyler Perry's shows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

BTG is Michele Val Jean's baby. Guza is a co-writer and Ron Carlivati is a staff writer. I don't really think it's fair to judge her brainchild according to the white men working under her, though I personally think Guza in particular has his merits.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This discussion probably best belongs in the Beyond the Gates thread but, since it's happening here...an article from Entertainment Weekly.

The most relevant quote from it as to what to expect: 

“We wanted to have a show on the air that spoke to a different side of the Black experience,” Val Jean tells Entertainment Weekly over a joint Zoom with Ducksworth. “Not the downtrodden, not the ghettoized. We wanted to show rich, Black people doing messy things.”

 

“I've long been fascinated with showing the side that we haven't seen a lot of,” says Ducksworth. “In these Maryland suburbs, there were some of the most affluent African American counties in all of America. So looking at that and the wealth of everything at Howard University, I felt that this was an area that was ripe for the picking. You get the upstairs, the downstairs of it all. It's true to life."

Personally, my best friend has family who lives in one of those suburban Maryland Black gated communities which I've visited many times. And it's something no soap has ever shown before. Sounds quite interesting to me!

 

 https://ew.com/beyond-the-gates-first-black-daytime-soap-preview-exclusive-8752814

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

It may not be fair, but I see those names and I get a lot of soap PTSD, even if they are just driving cars. 

As said above, I know it's probably best left for another thread.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm all for showing previously unshown portions of the Black experience, but why can't we have a soap that focuses on several different classes at the same time?  I agree; I'm also not interested in seeing the "ghettoized" (Val Jean's term) -- but what about the middle class?  Educated, professional people who are struggling to make ends meet (like most of us) and who are dealing with relatable problems.  I remember when "The Bold and the Beautiful" began -- the show focused on a wealthy family and a lower middle class family.  It was far more interesting than the version we have today where EVERYONE has designer clothes and never worries about paying rent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I completely understand your point of view. I haven't been reading the actual BTG thread yet because the show hasn't started and I'm sure many people feel similar. But, for me...I'm lower middle class and have trouble paying rent. I don't want to watch other people do the same.  

Please register in order to view this content

 I want to see rich people in designer clothes slapping each other over being betrayed!

I can't remember who posted it on this forum...it was years ago...but their description of what they want from a soap explained to me what I loved about the genre: "OTT villains and women who wear hats to the office."

I've been watching B&B from the beginning on its official YouTube channel and they dropped the lower middle class people pretty quickly. Within 18 months, the mother, the father, the grandmother, and Katie and Storm Logan disappeared along with Rocco and Brooke's original boyfriend. Like Dynasty before it, the show realized people wanted to see the rich people in the mansion in gorgeous clothes. I joked to my husband, "It's like they finally realized the show was called 'The Bold and the Beautiful,' not 'The Hesitant and the Homely.'" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

this OTT phenomenon began in the early 80s, with the ascent of primetime soaps — dallas, and in particular, dynasty — that coincided with the ‘luke and laura’ juggernaut. 

but soaps had already been around for 30+ years — something that get often gets lost in the shuffle. soap fans of a certain age:) remember  — and pine — the time when soaps focused on intimate interpersonal relationships between and among family and friends — rather ordinary people familiar to many viewers.

here and there some of that slack has been taken up in primetime and streaming. i’ll have a look at ‘behind the gates’ if only to see tamara tunie, but, and i’m paraphrasing here, i have to agree with the poster above who said that in daytime, that ship as sailed  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As I said to a poster above, I completely see and respect your point of view. I, myself, was born in '72 so grew up on the 80s daytime and nighttime soaps. That must be where I get my love of the OTT.

My best friend watches Emmerdale and loves how grounded and poor many of the characters are with just regular jobs. At the time he said that to me, I was re-watching Another World (was probably '89-'90 or somewhere in there,) and I said to him, "See, I'm the exact opposite. If Felicia Gallant wasn't a rich romance author, how could she possibly wear all those gorgeous hats and gloves, and own those fabulous purses??!!" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

not so much about economic status or class, what i miss is soaps with characters grounded in reality and emotional authenticity.

apple tv+ opened their vault over the weekend and i watched ‘shrinking’. the characters were largely well-educated, extremely well-paid professionals. but the relationships between and among the characters were grounded in familiar and relatable emotional conflicts — parent and child, spouses, friends, colleagues. 

would be nice if ‘behind the gates’ is at least emotionally grounded, but i’m not holding my breath. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy