Jump to content

Nate Berkus premieres with dreadful numbers


Soapsuds

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Oprah-Season-Premiere-Final-Season.jpg

The final season of The Oprah Winfrey Show premiered to a 6.8/17 household rating/share on Monday. That's up 3% versus last year. Some might have hoped for more for the final season before Oprah heads to OWN (Oprah Winfrey Network) on cable, after being pummeled with series lows during the summer…up is up!

Oprah spinoff The Nate Berkus Show premiered to a 1.2/4 household rating/share, up 20% versus the average for the time period last September.

I watched Nate's show and hated it. It looked so cheaply produced. The studio looked so damn small...ugh....

They are cancelling soaps left and right for talk shows/game shows which are getting worse numbers and demos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I like Nate Berkus, but has he ever been on any show beyond Oprah? Clearly he's not Dr. Phil, although I'd much rather see him with his clothes off...

I still think we're going to reach a point within 5-10 years when daytime is all reruns and no real new shows whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem becomes not whether they're cheaper than soaps but if they're cheap enough to warrant not just putting in reruns or something like a court show. Most of these talk shows aren't replacing soaps, they're replacing other talk shows. I wonder how many losses the talk show market will face before they dry up again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, but just about every talk show has a name. This one is interesting tho, because its an NBC talk show not a syndicated talk show.

Talk shows in general are interesting to look at, because it seems rather random what ones are a hit and what ones are not.

The Talk however is replacing a soap opera, and i dont see how one like that cant have a bigger budget han most with all those hosts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
There isn't a market for a show like his in daytime TV. They can't expect for Nate Berkus to have awesome households and demos when he's giving out furniture and painting walls advice. It didn't work for Martha, won't work for Nate. For Nate to work, they have to be realistic. His brand of advice is for a niche audience.

Aside from Dr. Phil and Rachael Ray, her spinoff talk shows have sets and theme songs that look like infomericals. Dr. Oz's New York studio couldn't look more bland. I wouldn't have expected any less from Nate Berkus. The only problem is that Oz actually has topics that interest everyday Americans and actually has a more lively personality. Nate often comes off to me as stuffy, pretentious, wannabe. Not to mention that hair. YUCK.

And what's your beef with talk shows/game shows? It's not like we've had six soaps canceled in a year. There were only two(that actually mattered) canceled in the past five years: ATWT and GL. And Nate Berkus is syndicated, just like most daytime talk/game properties, so I don't understand why the hell you're getting all pissy about it.

And as other people have said on the boards, even if the numbers for these upstarts are dreadful, they need at least two-three years to build an audience or a following. Hell, The View flew under the radar for ten years before they added Rosie O'Donnell and Whoopi, which pretty much sent the show into the ratings stratosphere. If The Talk pulls in dreadful opening numbers, don't think CBS will panic and just yank the show off the air. They will stick with it for at least a good five years.

And expect to see Nate renewed, especially if he shows even the slightest bit of growth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ouch, that sucks. He's adorable and I was hoping he would do well. I only caught the last few minutes of the premiere episode so I can't comment on how good the show is or not. He managed to almost completely hide his nervousness, though, which is to his credit.

But, what's with the OPRAH part of the news? Another site said she was actually down from last season's premiere (which they tried to make into a big deal, even though it was only a difference of 300,000 viewers).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Having Nate looking at people's houses for shitty furniture and giving beauty tips isn't worth watching....lol

And bellcurve...I can be pissy all I want.....lets see if u arent pissy when your GH is gone!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think @Darn @Faulkner and others have a fair point re: it being an unfortunate look and coincidence. I can see their point about the two Black husbands in rapid succession, without much time in between. Frankly, based on the early casting notices I thought before the show's debut (and I still suspect) that Ted's crimes might be far worse than infidelity or a secret baby. That would've mixed it up more. It's a soap, people are going to cheat, but it might've given them more variety if Nicole was stepping out first. Still, I wouldn't trade the Leslie/Eva reveal material for anything right now. Still, Fanfic Account #3 is just looking for any weapon to attack the show for not accepting his unsolicited scripts. When it's not the husbands it's Martin, or Chelsea or Dani. He's seething it got renewed.
    • I'm pretty sure Lucy and Bridget never even have another scene together for the rest of the time they're both on the show. Bridget isn't even invited to the wedding! The lack of community feeling and continuity of non-romantic relationships during this period is very jarring. Characters suddenly only seem to interact with a handful of other characters, rather than characters across the canvas. I'm deep into 1997 in my watch right now and find that it's even stranger because the show goes back and forth between ignoring history in order to manufacture some kind of separation between characters (for example, at one point Amanda refers to the Coopers as a family that the Spauldings "barely know," despite her and Alan spending the better part of 1996 going to war with Buzz over 5th street, and Alan has absolutely no reaction when he finds out about something bad that's happened to Abby, which seems pretty out of character given how close they were in 95/96) and ignoring history in order to create a sense of community that doesn't quite fit (characters who couldn't stand Amanda are suddenly acting all buddy buddy with her). The wheels really feel like they're coming off in 1997 (although I know some would argue that the wheels started to come off years earlier). Watching the Marcus/Dahlia romance again from a 2025 perspective is so weird. Marcus is a full grown man who must be at least in his mid-20s and he's dating a teenager who is not only still in high school, but is still fully a year away from graduation, and no one says anything about how creepy that is. I feel like the buzz around Marcus gave the illusion that the show was more invested in him than it ever actually was. Even during his "big" story where he's arrested for Cutter's murder, he actually doesn't appear on screen very often. He's imprisoned, Griffin is brought on, other characters make a fuss about trying to get him out, but there's a long stretch of time where he doesn't appear at all. I've been keeping episode counts while I watch and between Cutter's death in mid-November of 1995 and the end of the year Marcus/Mambo only appears 7 times (and of that only twice in December).
    • The letter reading was very emotional, and Maeve really got to me too. I was a little worried because Vanessa doesn't give a speech at the funeral, which surprised me, but then we got the private letter reading and her true emotional reaction and I was satisfied there. The YouTube channel I watch these episodes on (if not on our Vault), also had upset commenters talk about how Nola's line about Henry not accepting her at first/seen as a gold-digger was totally untrue. It's sad the writers don't do their homework and give fans the respect (and the characters respect). And yep, Bill got up and spoke at the funeral too, which was nice.  I didn't even realize that was Sharon Leal until you said it!  I had to Google it. I loved Sharon Leal in Boston Public back in the day haha. LOL at your Reva/Josh ALWAYS commentary. What is RME though?
    • Leslie is an extreme liar and manipulator. I'm not sure what her point was in trying to convince Nicole she wasn't trying to hurt her. As much as Eva did help orchestrate the entire plot I feel like there was too much piling on. Eva never said she wanted to be a Dupree so Anita was extremely out of line for that comment.  
    • Thanks!

      Please register in order to view this content

       That's positive and something to look forward to for sure, because you're right, 1996 so far isn't nearly as good as 1995. Ohh - what is Lonatrat?  Sadly you're probably right. I did feel like David was rarely seen once Marcus came on. That would have been an interesting spin, having Frank and Tina be teenage lovers and Dahlia really being his daughter. I'm getting the sense that Tina won't be seen too much anymore, as she just left Dahlia with Frank/Eleni as she's heading to jail for a while. I like the Tina actress too!  Her voice sounds a bit like Rosie Perez to me, which I love. I tried to find her online, but coming up empty. This was the only thing I could find about Tina Crede - a character snapshot video with clips and stills of her (randomly starting just before the 1:00 mark):

      Please register in order to view this content

      That's wild that the David actor is nearly 40 here! Definitely surprises me.
    • 5-6   Meh. It already looks like a scattershot week.    5-5 was actually a good episode. Damian and Lily. Phyllis finally going on the warpath that I knew she could get on with Billy and Sally. Nate started to question Audra and Victor's alliance. And I was not even bugged by Kyle and Claire.   But then there's Cole's off-screen story. Kyle and Claire going back to being whiny. And them even wanting Adam's penthouse just sounded like trying to keep the set around. And Diane shouldn't even give a flying frak about Billy's opinion. And Tessa, Daniel, and the guitars...yeeeah no.   But hey...JM looked good in that short. And those pants.  I agree. One of Y&R's good points with fans has always been that you do at least see the vets. And IN stories. 
    • One of the things that I found unnecessary and a bit disturbing about Ambitions was that in almost every episode someone was holding or shooting a gun.  Jamey and Ron seem to have the same fetish.
    • I had thought that there was a Tommy Biddles on there, but then I realized I was thinking of Dr. Biddles on Santa Barbara. Never mind! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy