Jump to content

Hot in Cleveland Discussion Thread


Jonathan

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I've seen the pilot and it's hysterical. Betty White is awesome as are the 3 co-stars, Valerie Bertinelli, Jane Leeves, and Wendie Malick.

I'm really stoked that La Lucci is making a guest appearance later in the season. There's a running sub-plot involving Wendie Malick's character and her bitterness towards La Lucci. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Five million viewers? That's, like, "network numbers," lol. Let's hope HiC can retain most of them. I really want TV Land to establish itself as another outlet for original, scripted programming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow go Hot in Cleveland! That's way higher than I expected, but I am glad none the less. ALL of the ladies were great, and I have mad love for Betty White.

I thought it was funny that Wendie Malick's character was on "The Edge of Tomorrow", an obvious referrence to "The Edge of Night" and "Search for Tomorrow".

One of my favorite lines:

"I never one a Daytime Emmy in 27 years! Never! Not even that season I so courageously battled Lyme disease!"

Very funny show, even better than I expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the show is great, TV Land must be thinking the ratings are better than great. All 4 actresses, Malick, Leeves, White and Bertinelli, should be toasting themselves.

It's a whole new world out there in television, TV Land has managed to make a show that beats most anything on network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not necessarily this show, because an original sitcom is something I've always wanted to see them do, but after High School Reunion and She's Got the Look and First Love, Second Chance and How'd You Get So Rich!?!?!? and all of their other random reality shows, any time I hear "all new TV Land original series," I get a sour taste in my mouth. It's the exact same thing as SOAPnet with their Southern Belles and Bank of Mom and Dad and HoliDate and blah blah blah.

But like I said, this show, I can give it a pass because it is more in line with their general focus. It's like if SOAPnet ever made their own soap, kinda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Probably. I mean, unless TV Land's programming chief, Larry Jones, is absolutely insane, I think the network's expectations for HiC's reception were probably modest at best. Still, its' performance proves two things: that audiences still want multi-camera, live-in-front-of-a-studio-audience comedy; and that, um, "women of a certain age" can still make an impact on TV in terms of ratings and demographics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Believe me, I do, too, lol! That's why I'm glad TV Land is taking a chance on HiC (and "Retired at 35") and that some critics - and now, audiences - are responding so positively to it. Who knows? This might encourage the network to produce more scripted efforts (dramas and comedies) ... and push the shittier, unscripted fare (which I think even TV Land recognizes as detracting from their mission; hence, the new sitcoms) off the lineup altogether. ;-)

TV Land will repeat the pilot on Saturday (although, I forget the exact time).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And that, right there, is the difference between a network like TV Land, and one like SOAPnet. TV Land saw a hole in the television landscape (namely, the dearth of traditional sitcoms) and, listening to the needs of their audience who missed these shows, decided to fill it. SOAPnet had a golden opportunity to satiate disgruntled fans' desire for new and better soap opera and keep a dying genre alive; instead, they spent a buttload on primetime soap-ish shows that people either didn't need or could watch elsewhere (like DVD); and spent the rest of their time pimping ABC's lineup to the already converted. If they were ultimately too vulnerable to the bloodless and soul-crushing whims of Team Disney, they've only themselves to blame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I have never been much of a Lulu fan either since the JMB days.  I do think Alexa Havins is really a great recast.  When Lulu returned it was at the expense of Sam (no loss to me) but not the best for audience favor, she was barely on screen for weeks after she woke up, then went to run off and put everyone in danger to find Charlotte at the expense of her other child, and finally moved on to this Brook/Dante baby investigation.  Lulu never had a chance to grieve the years she lost, re-bond with her family or her friends, re-integrate herself back into town, or be anything more than a chaos creator. Meanwhile, Brook Lynn is this poor, innocent victim that's being bullied by Lulu.  I don't think Lulu is right.  I would just like a little more subtlety in the writing. 
    • Just beautifully done. I could name some minor quibbles, but I won't, because what DAYS gave us today was golden. That was soap opera at its finest, paying homage to history and legacy and actors and the audience. This is why we love soaps.
    • To clarify, we could argue about the necessity to have John Black speak while in hospital, but the body created an opportunity for people to touch him, and move around him.  Even though I never totally suspended my disbelief, I appreciated their creative choice to form a visual representation of loss.  Certainly there were other ways to tell this story, but it will stay with me because those production choices enabled these performances. However, with disdain, I note that Days has found an odd middle ground between a flashback and a montage.  I define a flashback as least a couple of rounds of dialogue, if not a whole scene.  And a montage would be a visual snippet without much dialogue.  But, these were often just a single line, or an entrance.  It felt like a bit of a tease, and made me wish that Peacock had curated a playlist of John Black's Greatest Hits, like they do for some Bravo shows or SNL characters.  OT - but they have yet to maximize that platform.
    • It's tough for me because I feel like this has always been Lulu. She used to be even worse, slut-shaming, verbally abusing other women, and always being written as being in the right. They should let Brook Lynn get dirtier, but I think the material of Lulu digging and being self-righteous, making everything worse even while not intending to do so, but also not being as in the wrong as Dante thinks she is, all makes sense for her. But I don't have as much experience with Lulu as a lot of fans as I just could never stomach her beyond the time she was a mute kid, so I don't have much right to speak.
    • Thanks @JAS0N47 for all the ratings!   All My Children hits Number 1 in the ratings for the first time in its history during the week of 8/20/73-8/20/73!
    • I think the writing is slanted against Lulu.  I don't think there is an issue with the character in general.  I just think Lulu comes doesn't get many layers or nuance in her writing.  Lulu becomes obnoxious and a bully to Brook Lynn and both characters SHOULD have flaws.
    • Totally here for Anita dumping Sharon in the past for first Dante Green, and then Vernon...
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Hey Anita and Sharon

      Please register in order to view this content

        
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy