Jump to content

Nicollette Sheridan suing Marc Cherry


Soapsuds

Recommended Posts

  • 8 months later...
  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Earlier this year, TV star Nicollette Sheridan sued her former 'Desperate Housewives' employers--including the show's creator Marc Cherry, Touchstone Television Productions, ABC Studios and ABC Entertainment--for $20 million in relation to her firing.

RadarOnline.com reports that on Friday, new papers were filed, dropping some of the more shocking accusations from the original lawsuit. The actress previously claimed assault and battery, emotional distress, gender violence and wrongful termination.

In the new papers, Sheridan removed the claims of physical injury and emotional distress--and as a result, she will not have to submit to a physical and psychiatric evaluation.

She previously stated that she suffered--and continued to suffer--physical injury and emotional distress and in response, the defense demanded a physical and psychiatric evaluation.

http://www.popeater.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Members

Well, I guess you guys heard the news today that the judge has declared a MISTRIAL, and everything is going to have to start over. Marc Cherry must be shitting bricks.

By Harriet Ryan and Victoria Kim, Los Angeles Times

March 20, 2012

Four years after a sweeps week audience watched Edie Britt, the bed-hopping real estate agent in "Desperate Housewives," draw her last breath, a Los Angeles jury said Monday that it could not decide the cause of her death.

A judge declared a mistrial in Nicollette Sheridan's wrongful-termination suit after jurors said they were deadlocked as to whether the actress' character was killed off the ABC show in an act of retaliation or for creative reasons.

Eight jurors — one short of the nine required for a verdict in civil court — sided with Sheridan, who alleged that she was written off the show because she complained that the program's creator, Marc Cherry, had struck her in the head during a 2008 rehearsal. The other four voted with Touchstone Television Productions, whose lawyers said Cherry never hit Sheridan and had plotted Edie's death months before the actress made the allegation.

The jury had deliberated for four days and on three of those days, sent notes to L.A. County Superior Court Judge Elizabeth White, saying they were unable to reach a verdict. In a note Friday, the foreman said the split hadn't changed since an initial vote the first day of deliberations.

During the two-week trial, numerous witnesses from the show recalled the 2008 incident that ended with Sheridan yelling, "You hit me! You can't hit me!" and storming from the set. The actress testified Cherry had given her a "wallop" to the temple after she repeatedly questioned a line of dialogue. Cherry and others present said he had only tapped her to demonstrate a playful smack he wanted her to give her on-screen husband at the close of a scene.

Two jurors who voted for Sheridan said the case came down to witness credibility. Juror Beverly Crosby said she found Sheridan believable while the accounts of defense witnesses "didn't hold water for me." Speaking to a throng of reporters on the courthouse steps, she dismissed defense suggestions that the actress' story was suspect because she had variously characterized the blow as a slap and a hit.

"The evidence showed she was struck, so we didn't get bogged down with the terminology," Crosby said. "I looked at the fact that she was touched without permission."

Sheridan's lawyers had argued that producers, executives and writers at ABC and the studio had coordinated their testimony to help Cherry, but juror Johnny Hyunh hesitated when asked if the witnesses seemed rehearsed.

"I wouldn't say scripted. It's more like the story didn't match," Hyunh said.

No jurors who cast their votes for Cherry attended the news conference.

The trial offered jurors a behind-the-scenes look at the soap, which is to end this spring after eight seasons. The picture painted was often unflattering. Jurors heard that tabloid leaks from the set were a constant problem. There were salary disputes and tiffs over forgotten lines. Sheridan said Cherry condescended to her, and he said she was rude, tardy and unprepared for rehearsals. He recounted the frustration of co-star Teri Hatcher when Sheridan missed her lines and said two other stars, Felicity Huffman and Eva Longoria, were "relieved" when they learned she was leaving the show.

Much of the testimony focused on the timing of Cherry's decision to kill off Edie. Ten witnesses said he made it months before the on-set incident, but two writers for the show said her fate was not sealed until afterward.

Lawyers for both sides said they expected to retry a case that involves millions of dollars. Sheridan, who earned $4 million a year playing Edie, is seeking at least $5.7 million for economic losses and potentially much more in punitive damages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One short of what she needed....but certainly victorious in comparison to the Cherry/ABC side.

I have felt Nicollette was in the right from day one and the testimony from the ABC executives only confirmed my instincts. Things were coordinated and they were coordinated poorly because ultimately the truth is obvious and the truth is that ABC colluded to fire her for rocking the boat with the claim that Cherry hit her. A claim that, while not satisfying the court's definition of assault, has been admitted by Cherry and ABC.

Ms Sheridan is a confident and credible witness and ABC should do what is in their best interest and settle this case and settle it for what Ms Sheridan is asking for which should be in the $10 million range.

Had she had one more viewer on her side, she would have seen a punitive damage windfall that could have gotten her $20 million. ABC should just bite the bullet on this one because they're in the wrong annd 8/12 of their peers saw it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Meh I feel like Nicollette story changed too much, and she acts like her character was the only one ever killed off on DH.

MC doesn't have the right to strike her, but this whole things seems blown out of proportion, would she have even filed suit if her character hadn't been killed off? Nope very doubtful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But don't you understand that her lawsuit is for wrongful dismissal? That she's suing precisely because she was fired?

Her suit isn't even about the assault, what Marc Cherry admitted to, while inappropriate, doesn't satisfy the legal definition of assault and/or battery. Wrongful dismissal? 8/12 jurors felt she was wrongfully dismissed. She only needed one more and she can keep on trying this case until she gets her 9th juror.

I have found her story very consistent and the variety of her witnesses (DH writers, low level people at ABC who accidentally received an email informing them that their computers were going to be wiped of all email, television executives and Sheridan herself) instead of the circle jerk of ABC executives who are all biased as hell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's a shame what happened to Nicollette, but in interviews I always was under the impression Marc Cherry didn't like her. He made it clear in interviews she WASN'T the 5th housewife, something it seems ABC pushed. Every now and then she'd get her chance to shine, but he kept her in her place for the most part, only giving her bigger stories following her success after Marcia Cross went on maternity leave.

The worst part of this is that Nicollette will probably get blacklisted, which is a shame because I truly felt she was the most entertaining actress on Desperate Housewives. When the writing went to shyt, it was her keepin me tuned in. I think they were stupid not to look at her chemsitry with Neal McDonough and tried to find a way to make it work. I thought he breathed new life into the show and had they pulled back again they could've had a great villain. Unfortunately, they love those season long arcs which did him in.

I think Nicollette's best hope is that Dallas is a huge, huge hit and they decide to pursue a Knots Landing reboot. She'd be the obvious choice for that and it could help put her back on the map.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nicollette will absolutely be blacklisted by anyone in the ABC/Disney sphere, plus the ripple effect. That said, there are going to be studios and producers out there who hate Marc Cherry, hate ABC and might delight in hiring her to put the screws to a competitor because Nicollette does have her defenders, Jackie Collins has been very vocal about how much she enjoyed working with Nicollette on her NBC mini series. Really, I think Nicollette would be great on one of those NBC sitcoms like The Office or Parks and Recreation, she was the best thing about DH and I have to think others in the business noticed it.

The good news for her is that she WILL defeat ABC the next round. She WILL collect millions and that will help feather an already secure nest. Nicollette has her Knots Landing residuals to keep her warm at night in addition to her Desperate Housewives residuals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I do agree that I wish there was more gay representation in terms of singles. I also had hoped we'd get a Black couple since it was a Black soap and I don't know that we've ever seen that on a US soap.  With that said, it's still early days so I can imagine we'll get that at some point. I am impressed they launched with as much LGBT representation considering how US soaps can be.
    • Thank you. I know we're all supposed to see that BTG is progressive when it comes to queer characters, but it's telling that they won't commit to showcasing gay or bi males who are single and looking. That relationship couldn't be any more traditional. Will we ever get a bedroom scene with Smitty and Martin? I have my doubts.
    • This is a pretty huge thing IMO, but I guess we will see what happens? Can't get any worse then already. 
    • This can be difficult for a soap to depict. So far she's only shown an interest in women. Will a man come into her life? If she commits to a male, there will be  backlash, but if it's women only, them where is the bi/queer aspect? Personally, I would have liked a single gay male on the show dealing with hook ups/relationships etc. Smitty/Martin married with kids is limiting in those terms.
    • Of course, how could I have forgotten those thrilling episodes depicting the fire? Also we had the GCAC rooftop set that came out every Summer. Moving on to Friday's episode. Victor is propped in his chair, answers his cell and tells the caller 'Let him in'. Seconds later Kyle enters. So does Victor have security on the front porch? It would have been better had Victor taken the call, and then said to himself 'Well Kyle, let's see what you have to say'and fade out. Next scene Kyle enters, indicating that the first call was from the Ranch entrance and time had passed . Nit picky but I get frustrated when they do stuff like that.
    • Jordan was gone from '87 to mid-'89. He left just weeks after Robert's late '86 return.
    • Jordana Brewster is making a new movie. https://deadline.com/2025/06/rob-riggle-jordana-brewster-the-pirate-king-1236426287/ Kelly Rutherford posing for a magazine cover with her son. Kelly Rutherford Photographed with Model Son Hermés, 18, Years After Custody Battle  
    • I don't think Chelsea has a true label just yet. She's just finding out she has an interest in women. I think the awkwardness is aligned with the character as we've seen. This is the fool who keeps filming her family when embarrassing things happen and live streaming it. I actually think it's refreshing she isn't just jumping into a relationship  and that they're playing the beats of her trying to figure out who she is.
    • Wow, do I agree with you. Chelsea is coming off as ridiculous. All she does is look for a woman to date while not caring about her business at all. That she's bi is great, but they're not writing her like she's bi. She seems to be lesbian. Yeah, I know -- "no labels." I just don't find the writing for her story to be anything other than awkward.   -- I hope we get some diagnosis finality with Bill's trip to the hospital. I don't want to see these trips to the ER every other day. -- Naomi is going to blame herself for Bill's health problems? GMAB. -- Ashley doesn't read as a real nurse in the slightest. -- Another day, another rinse and repeat conversation with Derek and Ashley. YAWN. -- Kat is making mistakes, but she's fun to watch and listen to, regardless. -- I still think the Joey/Vanessa/Doug gambling story sucks. I know Doug is deeply in debt, but I don't like him acting this meek and submissive.  -- I'm not sure what Joey's plan was from the beginning, or why he had to seduce Vanessa at all to get his way. I'm not sure what Vanessa ever saw in Joey -- why doesn't he give her the ick? -- I'm fine with a story where Doug and Vanessa take out Joey.  -- The fades to commercials were pretty bad today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy