Jump to content

Bravo's The Real Housewives of....


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Cheap21

    4961

  • Taoboi

    4020

  • Cat

    4011

  • NothinButAttitude

    3972

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

perhaps. i just have a hard time figuring how they'd work her in there in as a friend. I think she'd look very out of place in OC. Who would be her connection. Tamra, Gretchen? I cant see her hanging out with Jesus Jugs. Not seeing her being brought into the group as a friend of Heather's unless Bravo scripts it that they just so happned to meet and hit it off as they "went for an audition"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree but what if they all start getting along? We need a Faye like character for Kyle because I don't want Y/B/L to ever break-up on-screen.

That's why I'm not seeing Faye as a lock - those rumors. Brandi is considered "poor" and "trashy" in terms of RHOBH although some of the richest of these women do adore her. On top of that, adding "the morally corrupt" Faye wouldn't help in terms of attracting really rich name -itches.

It's not like I want Faye. It's that I want a trouble making Kyle ally. Camille could have worked but it never made sense for her to side with Kyle outside of it being scripted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I had this whole long reply typed out in response to the "Teresa is evil" response but the computer shut down randomly and I lost it all...fml.

Anyways I'll just keep it simple. Nothing to date has shown Teresa and Joe's house to be "abusive" and frankly thats just totally made up. Joe Guidice saying the "f word" or telling his kids to shut up isn't some grand crime against humanity nor is it out of the ordinary from what I see here in my state at Walmart or Target each and every day.

Teresa has never shown herself to be a fame whore or desperate for the headlines. If you're saying that she hoped/wanted to make it bigger than the answer Ithink is yes. And its the same can be said for Caroline, Jacqueline, and Melissa. All of them signed up for the show hoping to make it big. I don't its a crime for any of them. The only difference is that Teresa is the SOLE housewife from RHONJ to gain any sort of success along with a massive fanbase.

Face it...without Teresa there is NO show. No one wants to see drunk Jacquiline, fake nice Melissa with probably in the closet Joe Gorga, menopausal irate Caroline, or the "other one" whos not even worth mentioning...

Anyways Faye definitely should not be asked to join RHOBH. It would immediately decrease the value of the franchise and remove the "classy" factor. And no Brandi Glanville is not trash. Just because she's not as rich as the other housewives doesn't mean she doesn't look just as fabulous or carry herself with dignity and grace like Lisa or Yolanda.

EDIT: Teresa has the right to deny she had financial troubles. It is their personal business and just because they're on the RHONJ that doesn't mean each and every detail of their lives has to be public knowledge. The same applies to Jac. That being said I think if Teresa was truly in any financial danger she and Joe would have gotten rid of that gorgeous mansion by now.....

Meanwhile its well known that Melissa and Joe had to leave that house which they apparently never even owned!? How ridiculously embarassing....

Edited by ThePrinceOfSunspear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Or Megan is shot by mobsters as retaliation for Dave's unpaid gambling debts.
    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy