Jump to content

HBO: Game of Thrones


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Members

There sure was a lot of focus in that article on how hard it was for Cogman. Not to be hard-hearted, because I'm sure he genuinely was upset with the whole thing, but he also chose to write the scenes, rather than ask them to give someone else that script. It's not as if he was held at gunpoint.  The whole thing has the usual sycophant-EW undertone of "Don't be critical - you'll hurt his feelings" and praise him because he's "speaking his truth," or whatever the jargon would be.

 

The other problems are:

 

- This is not a realistic show. It's a fantasy show. Why is it that when women are brutalized, it's suddenly time for realism? And if we're talking realism, then Ramsay would not have left her alone as she repeatedly shunned and belittled him. He wouldn't have just killed some servant she barely knew. He would have repeatedly raped her, or he would have tortured or killed her. That's Ramsay. He has little self-control when he is not completely in charge. 

 

-  His comments about her wanting to "get the hell out of there" remind me of the ideas that she needed to be empowered through rape. But none of this happened. Said empowerment amounted to a few sassy one-liners to Ramsay and berating Theon. One could say that she eventually broke through to Theon, but this was not well-told onscreen, and it could have been done without a rape scene. 

 

The people who run this show got high on their own hype and they are also lazy in how they write for characters who are not their favorites. So Sansa got shoved into this story because it saved time and they thought they could pass off a season of nothing beyond a rape scene and being locked up with the Boltons and Theon (whose "redemption" reduced him to a bit player and basically just existed to pit abuse victims against each other until a rushed denouement) as some type of strength. And since it didn't get the result they expected, out come the violins. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

The difference is that I think Sansa is one of their favorites, particularly in the last two years. But I also don't think the show is nearly as driven by fanbases as you do. I think they acknowledge them but they don't write for them, any more than TWD really does.

 

I don't agree with the fantasy excuse - this is a world GRRM created which has always, always had this low fantasy world heavily steeped in the horrors of brutal medieval societies. We see people gutted, ravaged, families wiped out, etc. and no one has an issue with that, but when it comes time to deal with sexual violence some people seem to want to fall back on "it has dragons and fantastical elements so this other stuff shouldn't happen". My take is that they either can choose to want the show and its content to be infantilized or not. (I don't think you feel this way, but I think the bounce between the two extremes comes up a lot online.) Do I think there's been too much rape, probably, and I don't think Sansa's was necessary. But I also understand how it happened and I don't think it was exploitation, or shot or written as such.

 

I think they made a narrative and perhaps stylistic choice you didn't agree with, and a narrative one I didn't agree with. I understand their reasoning though, and I don't think it's not genuine or hypocritical. YMMV.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I don't think it's as fanbase-driven as TWD, but it's a self-fulfilling prophecy with GoT. From the start they were, to me anyway, far more invested in characters like Dany, Tyrion and Arya than in most of the rest. And that's where their focus still goes now, as does their attempts at less clumsy, generic writing. If Sansa is a favorite, then not only giving her another woman's storyline, but also taking away about 50 IQ points (would the "player" Sansa really think that the best reaction to a lunatic raping her and holding her captive be to taunt him about being a bastard?) is an odd way of showing it. 

 

Again what bothers me with the "realism" element is it's only realistic when it's time for rape and violence against women. You can say well, they show torture and violence, and that's real, but it's not something that is often repeatedly invented and revived just for the show, the way the rapes are. And it's only realistic within a narrow parameter. Realism would likely include Sansa bleeding to death, or being tortured, or being violated day after day, the way Jeyne Poole was. They didn't want that (nor did I, obviously), because that can't be spun as "empowerment." So it is, for me, trying to have it both ways on their part. As all this type of writing is on this show.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I honestly don't think TWD gives a [!@#$%^&*] about fanbases; if they did, we'd have seasons of possibly-asexual molestation victim Daryl being an utterly different character and overtly agonizing over two women onscreen. They're renewed from now til the actual zombie apocalypse at this point, they don't have to care, and GOT also has a much bigger blank check. I think there's a lot of primetime and cable we can potentially apply the cancerous soap audience-to-brass signal to noise ratio thinking you're talking about to, but I just don't think those two shows are a part of that. And I don't think their social media presences can be taken as part of the active production of the shows, either - that's a whole different wing.

 

I actually felt Arya was considerably downplayed last year, as was Tyrion in a lot of ways - he was a sideline to a lot of Daenerys' story and is left in her wake with the rest at the end of the season. I understood why they wanted to consolidate the stories WRT Winterfell/Ramsay Snow, but I don't think either a. raping her, b. raping, torturing and mutilating her, or c. nothing at all were the only options.

 

I agree with you about some of the rapes and sexual violence that's been added to the show, which is why I agree it's overused at this point. And while I think they had the right idea folding Sansa's story back into Winterfell and Ramsay and consolidating it into one resembling one from the books, I don't think they needed to add that specific incident. I think it was a mistake, but I don't think it was done for titillation or exploitation. And I don't think Sansa's empowerment is all about her rape - I think it began before then and continued after, which is why it didn't need to happen at all. But I don't think the only way they can or should be allowed to do some of these things is to do it utterly horribly or not at all.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not buying into their apologies or sadness either really. They revel in their own filth whenever they write for the Ramsay storyline. The writers themselves have even said that they like writing storylines in which Theon suffers. Sansa was a tool for them to utilize to torture the fan base, and was another trophy for Ramsey to "win." Nothing they say will rid me of that belief. He can take his tears and sprinkle them over his food for seasoning, as far as I am concerned.

Edited by Skin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well he failed to give a compelling reason why Sansa had to be raped, which is what makes me feel this way. I felt that it was a gratuitous choice in the first place, and it always seemed like another tool for them to utilize to flagellate Theon further, and to emasculate him more as a cowardly figure. But we are all entitled to our own opinions.

Edited by Skin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm happy for him and I think he's a good choice. I just know it will take until he appears on the Luke Cage series for the Internet to stop shrieking because they didn't cast an Asian-American actor. (I would've been perfectly fine with that though Danny Rand is historically white and that's a substantial part of his backstory - admittedly a somewhat dated one which could've been modified. I just don't like when the Internet thinkpiece culture gangs up to try to wish something into reality with magical thinking and then becomes outraged when the extremely predictable opposite occurs, as though they were 'owed' it.)

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh. Thanks. At this point I'm surprised people were expecting it from Marvel. Then again people were upset that Dr. Strange was cast with a white man...

 

Finn's rarely had anything to do on this show so I don't know how he'll be as Danny, but I'm very happy for him. He deserves the break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I have to be honest I’m really struggling with this show. I love everything with Eva/Leslie/Ted/Nicole/Kat and enjoy Dani and Bill’s shenanigans (I’m on the Hayley needs to be recast train now tho), Chelsea is second to Kat as my favorite Dupree grandkid and I loved her coming out to her mom. The show was on a truly great run with the big Leslie and Eva reveal at Nicole and Ted’s anniversary party and the fall out has still been good even with the unnecessary Ted recast and them making Leslie kind of dumb by exposing herself too much unnecessarily. The real problem for me started when they rotated back to way too damn much screen time for Derek/Ashley/Andre (if anyone should have been up first for a recast it was these three IMO). They tried way too hard to drum up drama between Ashley and Derek and the actors were clearly fighting for their mediocre charisma less acting lives to make it work but none of it landed, just horrible. Naomi and Jacob and this weird homeless woman story are also BORING. I can see where its potentially going but IDGAF at all, my only hope for them is that they’re building a triangle with Naomi/Jacob/Kat because Jacob and Kat have stronger chemistry together than their current love interests (Eva is the only one who can make the awful Tomas work). Martin, his secret and still cringe worthy acting got kind of interesting with Bill dropping hints to Smitty but they completely lost me with that lil fakeout scene at the country club. The lame “teenagers” (air quotes because Samantha is no Bianca Lawson and never beating the black Andrea Zuckerman allegations) can get off my screen as well. Joey creeping on Vanessa is grossing me out at this point, I actually quite like Vanessa and Doug now but Joey falls totally flat as a villain and someone we’re supposed to buy Vanessa being enamored with. I’m glad they’ve finally set up something interesting for Vernon and Anita to do with this girl band reunion instead of Anita wringing her hands and telling us she feels darkness coming and Vernon giving a civil rights speech every episode but yeah… People who’ve posted with me for other shows know I’m not one for fast forwarding or hate watching either, if I find a majority of a show is not working I usually just quit but because of what this show represents for me as a Black male soap fan I really want to stick it out. Its just become a challenge lately. I saw Guza has left the building and I REALLY hope we hear about some more BTS changes. The additions of Tracy Thompson and Jamie Giddens don’t exactly inspire a lot of confidence from me tho. Honestly praying hard for a new EP to replace JHC, a lot of the stuff that annoyed about her PC and AMC runs has started to match up here. I’m giving the show through the Summer to rectify some things but IDK how long I can hold on tbh. Its been a struggle to even finish some of these episodes lately.
    • I agree. I liked the episode but it felt jarring to suddenly return to a bunch of plots that had been put on pause since the Nurses' Ball started. Although I did like Laura popping in at the end to tell Alexis that millions of dollars have suddenly disappeared from Ace's trust fund. One set of scenes that made me feel optimistic for the next few months were between Sofia Mattsson and Rory Gibson. While Rory has been good as a darker, colder Michael this week, I was worried that he might not have much range. But he really warmed up with Mattsson, and I thought that (for the first time) Michael and Sasha had some genuine chemistry.
    • Next week is going to be such a sad time... I just feel it based on what was shown today. I'm wondering if the whole John being bandaged thing being a throwback to how he first arrived on the show was a Ron C idea since it just seems as though this would be something he would come up with.  If so, it's good that Cwikly/Ford are in charge with the implementing of the idea instead of him. Just a delayed thought from the Ciara scenes earlier in the week, or last week.. and how she had an odd way of dressing/acting.  I chuckle because little Ciara did say that she admired and wanted to be just like Kristen when she grew up.  So the fact that her outfit choices are so odd/off beat and her manner is a bit OTT just fits.. especially since Eileen's Kristen had an odd sense of fashion and that frantic OTT undertone to her delivery. With that said, a part of me wonders how Eileen's Kristen would have handled the scenes being done this week in regards to John's situation.   
    • My god the smirking was back in full force today. He almost started smiling after Johnny mentioned he wouldn’t be there if EJ hadn’t raped Sami. I will say I did like seeing him with Dee as they’ve always had great chemistry.    They really are giving a lot of false hope with John getting better. I wish they hadn’t done that. Monday is going to be devastating. I really liked all the characters mixing and mingling today.  Nu-Rachel is still too sweet for me. Loved all the flashbacks. Everyone looked so young. Really enjoyed Brady’s scenes with John today.  
    • Valerie Mahaffey Dead: ‘Northern Exposure,’ ‘Dead to Me’ Actress Was 71 Loved her. I've never seen her Doctors work. 
    • Valerie Mahaffey Dead: ‘Northern Exposure,’ ‘Dead to Me’ Actress Was 71 I just loved Valerie on my early '90s TV shows. This one gets me. 
    • I assume they did at some point during the finale...
    • Kelly was a horribly-written character overall. Just think, two Emmy-winning actresses (including Cynthia Watros, Nina, GH, and Annie, GL) couldn't make it work. Pamela is campy, but so are Dani, Vanessa, Leslie, and Joey. And, I don't want to be too judgy because my love for camp changes depending on the show. OLTL, DAYS, and some eras of GH had me rolling with the camp. However, Passions was overkill and I hated it. And, here, I can take it or leave it. It's ok in small doses (note to RC). I see this show as more of a serious drama.
    • I think one of the reasons that pilot didn't get picked up was because Vicki L was associated more with being Thelma Harper and playing older then she was playing her own age.  It was a blessing it didn't get picked up, or we would have been deprived of the syndicated era of Mama's Family.   Also, worth noting a Pre Night Court Marsha Warfield and pre Perfect Strangers Rebecca Arthur in the cast.  All talented women, but stuck with a bad script. And the other pilot had a pre Fran Fine.. Fran Drescher as the best friend.  I think that pilot might have been picked up if Karen Valentine and Fran Drescher switched roles.
    • So, on rewatch....did Rick and Mindy never have sex? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy