Jump to content

Jay Leno moving back to the Tonight Show?


JaneAusten

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 295
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It mostly has to do with my age. My contemporaries (very bottom of 18-49), I've found, really just don't have an interest in the current late night talk show circuit. The humor is much too "old," even with someone like Conan or Kimmel. The whole "Tonight Show" franchise/legacy is something that I don't see appealing to young people today. What's comedy to us is very different. It's not a bad thing or a good thing, it just is, you know? Network TV is also "old." Sure, there are a few folks I know who watch Grey's in primetime, and of course, the CW's lineup, but other than that, look at the mean ages for various shows in primetime. Even CW's "Vampire Diaries" has a mean age of somewhere around 32-35. If they're not watching the networks during primetime, they're not really gonna venture into broadcast territory for late night, especially when cable has repeats of the network shows that they aren't watching in primetime (Family Guy/NCIS/L&O/CSI).

If a young comedian, like a Dave Chappelle, had a late night talk show on Comedy Central, it would almost be a guaranteed hit with the college crowd. As it stands, Jay Leno isn't very appealing, Letterman isn't, and once you get pass 10:35 (because I live in the Central time zone, and I'll never feel right calling it 11:35), people are falling asleep or they only have the TV on as background noise while Facebook causes widespread insomnia. Jimmy Fallon is totally not what young people want to watch, no matter what NBC might think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, absolutely, but I'm an exception. I watch daytime and I watch primetime shows in their first-run. There are lots and lots of exceptions, I'm sure, but the vast majority? Don't watch soaps (and if they do, it's not in a watch-every-day sense), don't watch late night at all, and might watch some primetime shows on the networks, but mainly in cable repeats.

I don't have anything to back this up, and I could be totally and utterly and completely wrong, but I'm a college student who knows enough people and has seen enough "About Me" sections that barely have anything under the "TV" column.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jesus, you're that young?! LOL. You've really done your TV/Soap research.

And Arsenio was much like Chappelle back in the day. Not so much in the comedy route(because Chappelle would wipe the floor with Arsenio), but Arsenio's show was more edgy, featured more rock/rap/R&B groups, and appealed to a younger audience. Arsenio was pre-internet and was very much instrumental in spreading the rumor that Milli Vanilli was a fraud and, of course, he was right. Extremely instrumental in exposing Bill Clinton to a younger/minority audience, that ultimately helped seal the 1992 election. YouTube some of his controversies(i.e. Queer Nation) and you'll see what I mean. No talk show host, even today, would keep that in their show.

Comedy Central seems very happy with Daily Show/Colbert Report.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But I think you're right. :) This is a major problem for TV business today and I think we are in the transition period, between old, traditional TV and a model which shall dominate the future. And it's unclear what that will be: online, cable, pay-per-view/on-demand...

By the way... Can someone tell me where to find the writers for all these shows (Leno, O'Brien, Letterman, Fallon, Ferguson, Daly...)? Including Jon Steward and Saturday Night Live?

Bellcurve, what are your late night watching habits? And what do you think about Jon Stewart? And also The Simpsons and South Park, since I'm already asking? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sadly, I work most weeknights, but I usually stick with Nightline. Around fall of last year, ABC was the only analog station I could get, so that was the show I became attached to. And I really loved the radical changes Nightline made(turning into more of a newsmagazine) and I love the show's graphics. And after Nightline, I'd catch Jerry Springer for the juvenile, 3rd Grade level audience questions("So he worked at Subway. Did you get the six inch or the footlong?"). Either that or something else in syndication.

Also, I don't have cable so I don't watch Daily Show/Colbert Report and quite frankly, I can't stand the hype surrounding those shows. It's a typical, "OMG, I watch this show. Therefore, it makes me smart!" among those who drink wheat beers or Cosmotinis and want to appear educated and knowledgeable in regards to politics and foreign affairs instead of watching stuff like Sunday roundtables or the actual CNN/Fox News interviews themselves. They prefer the humor, the cherrypicking, etc. Which I guess is fine, but I usually lose respect for people who start a morning conversation with, "OMG, DID YOU SEE THE DAILY SHOW! OMG!!!" With regard to Stewart, I love his delivery from what I've seen and I have immense respect for him changing the game and making the show more about news and politics, therefore making people forget Craig Kilborn even existed. His being mean to Jennifer Love Hewitt(around the time she was promoting Garfield) was great.

The Simpsons still delivers a good laugh, but the Bart-Centric years were way better though(the first five-seven seasons). And South Park hits more than misses. I got really hooked on the show when it was double-airing in syndication on the MyNetworkTV station here. And before you ask, I love the Seth MacFarlane franchise, no matter how offensive it is. The show has great moments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol: EricMontreal had the same reaction when we had a PM convo last week. I'm young, but I like to say I'm eclectic. I grew up on Nick at Nite, and I've an unhealthy obsession with television and the biz. If I had the talent, I'd love to be a part of it, but sadly, I do not.

Oh yeah, I know all about Arsenio, but I would have felt weak (and a little precocious) if I'd said "Oh, I was still in Pampers when he was on."

What made Arsenio successful was the fact that he wasn't trying to put his mark on a long-standing, beloved, time-honored, (stuffy, safe, boring!) television "legacy." That's why Conan kinda annoys me. He's all about wanting "The Tonight Show." If he wants to do his comedy, reach people, inspire young comics, etc, he should be content to do that on any show, whether it's "Tonight," "Today," or "Yesterday Afternoon." No, he seems hung up on wanting to follow in someone else's footsteps and being put in the same company as Carson, Allen, etc. That's all fine and dandy, but when Carson took over in '62, he didn't inherit a "legacy" that he had to "keep going" blah blah blah. He just did his comedy. Just do your damn comedy, and stop being pretentious.

I side with Conan on this one. I get why he's pissed, because the one thing I will shoot a person for is going back on their word. Do not tell a person A and then do B without a valid explanation. That's why I won't boo-hoo over Jay being "forced out." He agreed to the deal knowing the terms. No one screwed him over. If he didn't like their deal, he could have left, but he stayed.

Exactly. In the end, the only thing the people behind the shows (and I mean the shows themselves, not the networks) can really do is put out what they feel is their best product. If they do that and still fail, then they know for certain that one (or both) of these two things must be true: Their best is no longer what most people want, or the problem is beyond the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm seeing some interesting takes on this thread regarding Dani's behavior/personality, including right now. Here's my take on her: I think that Dani relishes in lighting people up. I think that's for multiple reasons.  I feel like Dani has probably largely been like this throughout her life. And that she gets joy in dragging people whenever she feels like it's necessary. I believe she feels like this is her being herself. I think one big reason why she's particularly giddy right now is because she's able to go back to acting this way, minus the hurt she's been dealing with due to Bill's affair. She got in Bill and Hayley's faces after their affair/wedding, but she was miserable doing it due to dealing with the hurt of that situation. Nicole's situation with Ted/Eva/Leslie allows her to act this way minus her suffering like she did at the hands of Bill. I believe she does empathize/care for her sister but is also interestingly enough rejuvenated by this situation. This situation is energizing her and making her act more like old self again, minus the being hurt by her own's husband's infidelity. I think it's a distraction for her from dealing with her own failed marriage to Bill.  
    • Great episode, better than what the spoilers said. The gambling story was tolerable but Jon Lindstrom sucks in the role. Ambyr Michelle continues to shine. The diner and country club scenes were very well executed.  The Jan and Leslie scenes were very good! My favorite is Eva, now followed by Nicole.
    • Today's show was good. The only part I didn't care for were the Derek/Ashley scenes. I think they are bland together and Derek is very bland by himself. He is the least interesting character on the show IMO. I don't think they have much chemistry together. I appreciated Jan's reaction to Leslie. I like how regular/realistic her and Mona are as characters. Jan came across as very believable of being appalled and even hurt by Leslie's treatment of them and towards Eva in the diner.  Leslie continues to try and manipulate people with IMO her fake caring routine, only to show her true colors after she's confronted/called out for her treatment of others. I continue to dislike the way she mistreats Eva. Speaking of Eva she was great again today. I love her and I like how Martin comforted her in the diner. I liked that Vernon showed concern for her as well. They (especially Martin) will come around quicker to her before others (like the Dupree women) will. I also am glad to see her and Ted continue to bond and him behaving like a father towards her/helping her. He's the only one in her life who is fully trying to stand by her. I look forward to seeing their relationship grow.
    • Xander was screaming at Felicity.  He did do something wrong.  Felicity was clearly upset by it and Cat/Chad told him to stop.  That's fair.  No one deserves to be yelled at their job-and even I think this plot point is too preachy.  It's not acceptable behavior for anyone to do that.   
    • When Derek finally appears with only a towel, and his chest and pecs/nipples are finally shown, I say yes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Now, actually not. That thought had not even made it into my head, so, no, so far anyway, I've not seen that. Haven't seen today yet. What you're describing is warped & I think she's feeling genuine empathy & sister bond. 
    • Xander was the bigger person apologizing to Cat when he didn't do anything wrong.  he wasn't yelling at Felicity whatsoever, he was asking if she possibly had given them the wrong order by mistake.  He was trying to get to the bottom of what was going on, but Chad/Cat were trying to white knight Felicity even though Felicity was being treated just like anyone else in that situation.   She was the one to bring the order out to them, and usually the person that brings the order out is the one that puts the order together.    I'm still getting a read on the Cat character.   I think she seems to work well when interacting with everyone other than Chad.   Perhaps the new writers can move Cat out of Chad's orbit into another orbit. Paulina has been written quite well the few times she's been on since the writer change.  I think Jackee is enjoying the new writing.. you can tell when she's on screen.  
    • LOL - well, Peter was included in the grandkids' section, each named specifically with their $100K trusts.  It must have been the abs...

      Please register in order to view this content

        In Henry's will, he said it had to do with Hart having a chance at being a better person than his father, since his father isn't providing for him (I'm paraphrasing here, but it was about Roger).  Still a little surprised...
    • I'm glad the truth is all out regarding Roman and Kate's secrets from each other, and also happy Roman didn't make much of the letter forgery, because why would he even care? They are a good solid couple. However, not to be mean, when Roman had his little flashback at the DiMera mansion he seemed more like an old man that was lost. How wonderfully aggravating that we still don't know what the hell happened with Johnny the night EJ was shot. I can't wait to find out. I've my feelings clear on Paulina, but she was definitely written much more adult and Jackée even seemed a bit toned down, for the better. Nothing boring about either scenes for me. I like the little drama between Xander and Cat, for the newness of the interaction alone. AnnaLynne McCord is much better at material where she's not acting dementedly lovesick. Seeing that side to Cat was integral to remembering she's not a moron, and I am definitely intrigued by the heck could be calling her. Kevin Lambert returning is a cute little surprise. I never watched Chadwick Hopson in the role though, was he any good? 
    • Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy