Jump to content

Soap actors who never had a defining role


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Maureen's another character I think has had the good fortune to be cast more than once successfully. I could accept Ellen Parker (who should've been snapped up by another soap when GL let her go, gosh darn it!) as Maureen just as easily as I could Ellen Dolan -- and believe me, I don't just accept ANYONE as a Reardon. ;-)

I think many of the first- or second-generation (TV) soap actors were those who never had defining soap roles - actors such as Val Dufour and Ann Williams come to mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I know. I think she didn't get more work because she was over a certain age, and not stick thin. Even when she was on GL, they didn't use her very often. It was yet another reminder of how out of touch with their audiences soaps can often be. Someone like Maureen is someone who is easily dismissed by the elites as "boring," when that's actually a touchstone for many fans.

I do think Margo and Tom were very lucky in their recasts. Probably Margo moreso than Tom, but the only Tom I ever saw until Youtube and the occasional holiday classic rerun was Scott Holmes, so he was fine with me. I did like seeing Justin Deas as Tom, he had great passion. Gregg Marx is more of the classic leading man type, and had strong sex appeal.

Speaking of ATWT, I was just thinking about Sharon Case, who went around for years on GH and ATWT in roles which didn't go anywhere, and then she was cast as Sharon on Y&R. She's a good actress but she was also lucky to have gotten that part when she did because the first 3-4 years Sharon was a superbly written character.

Liz Keifer is another who went around for years until she found gold with Blake on GL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yet another great example of a character (Blake Marler) w/ more than one successful actor attached. Each GL fan has his or her particular favorite (mine was/is Sherry Stringfield), but I'd be hard-pressed to argue that LK or even Elizabeth Dennehy, the original Blake (after the writers came back from the '88 WGA strike and turned her into Roger and Holly's daughter) didn't do a good job w/ the role.

Conversely, although Mart Hulswit played Ed Bauer the longest, and is probably the most iconic in that role to GL fans of a certain age, I personally think Peter Simon did a much better job conveying Ed's personal sense of angst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think some fans may almost prefer Hulswit because he didn't play the angst as much. Ed's sorrow and sadness under Simon is something which some people seemed bothered by, although I thought it fit the character.

Most of the time now when soaps recast they seem to put everything on the actor, but really, it's the writing. The best recasts are often those who have the strongest writing, like LK's Blake, the various Vickys on AW (minus the one after Ellen Wheeler), Jack and Jill on Y&R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I got another one. Amelia Heinlee. She's been on City/Loving, AMC and Y&R and I dont think either of these soaps had a defining role for her. She's been on Y&R the most as Victoria, but to this day she is still compared negatively against Heather Tom. Mia from AMC was a mess and I dont think Steffi was all that memorable from the City/Loving

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
    • OMG...Robert Mandan! And Donna Mills is a child. I keep hoping for more of early Ross/Vanessa.
    • I get your point, but I also know that if the roles were reversed -- if a man were screwing around on a woman this way -- everyone would be all "All with his head!" When I say Vanessa needs therapy, I'm actually being kind, because I could begin and end with the fact that she's a cheating slut.
    • Is nobody going to mention the cringefest that is 'Carl Ivati'?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy