Jump to content

Y&R: Week of November 16, 2009 Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think the opposite. MAB clearly stated that Adam is a sociopath in an interview with Branco which to me they have sold that aspect. Clearly they didn't need to take the character there, but I think in that aspect Muhney has been giving them what they wanted. This is why I kind of understood Engen's "issues"; he no longer knew or understood the character and by all indications he disagreed with the characterization going this route. Now I will say this sociopath(ism?) as depicted in Adam is not even romantic on a soap. When I see Adam and Sharon I think predator and prey (not in any good sense). I always try to respect the opinion of others, but when I read posts of fans who claim to like the Adam/ Sharon pairing I admit I'mma bit bewildered. I mean viewers saw what Adam did to Ashley right? I havn't felt any vulnerability or remorse from the character since Engen left the role. Then we saw what he did to Sharon. Remorse was an "afterthought", almost forced in these plot points. I no longer believed the character felt any kind of sorry. Sorry MM never sold me int hat way. This pairing is wrong for many reasons and it is not just because it victimizes both the characters of Sharon and Ashley in its wake, it's also because part of the problem with the writing has been the misogyny. The approach here has been to me: a glance at men who are d!cks and the women who love them anyway' no matter the loss of self respect. Phyllis, Heather, Sharon, Mac, Chloe, Patty, Ashley etcetcetc. The Adam and Sharon pairing crosses the line for me a bit more. IMO if the writers are this fascinated by more , darker misogyny they need to make it clear it is not romance because it is not.

I havn't watched much of them but the scenes I saw of both Adam and Sharon I just got a feeling that SC was not very comfortable with the overall tone of the character dynamics but I could surely be wrong.

The dynamic between Sharon and Adam shoould have been the writers opportunity of redeveloping Sharon. I think what should probably have occured is maybe more friendship and no coupling before the big reveal. It would have given the audience a bit more opportunity to sympathize with each and the baby switch wouldn't then be for nothing. I don't get how you are Mark but I am not at all compelled by any of this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

If something is too contrived and is poorly built up, then it's not soapy, at least in my opinion. That's how I feel about Adam/Sharon.

Sometimes you can avoid the obvious and still tell a good story.

It would have been very, very easy, and some would say soapy, for Sharon to have gotten together with Victor early on, when he was paying her mother's hospital bills and when he was, I believe, starting to split from Hope. Yet, if they had done this, would Sharon even be around today?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They are over used IMO because they have weak character development. Last year we were able to stand watching Katherine go off the road and go through her whole ordeal because they used Katherine's and other verteran characters history as a clutch to carry this story. They are unable to do much of that with Billy and Adam and instead of properly developing each character, whilst they move them along within the plot, they pull these manytime confusing, conflicting, ooc characteristics to move the plot along. Of course, as it seems, they are trying to set up new legacy for new generation characters but they are so many discrepancies there. IMO the ADAM character can be salvaged in many ways but I do not view him as a hero or an anti hero at this point. I don't know where he falls it is somewhere between villainous tyrant and cartoon villain. As for Billy I don't even care to watch these writers version of him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Adam yes.

Billy no.

Maria has written Billy way OOC but LML did too.

Victor Jr. though was a relatively fresh character & she screwed him up royally.

Muhney is a strong enough actor to make the character work despite the horrible writing but between his tics & Morrow's complete laziness it's resulted in a world of suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah I know what u mean, to be clear I was speaking of Billy as a developed character in terms of being compared to a richly developed character like Katherine. But that's what I mean when I say "these writers version of Billy" Their idea is for him to be more like Jack reminiscent of Terry Lester's days. It doesn't work because it marks the character as being completly and utterly self indulgent. But then the character is self indulgent and a viewer like me realizes he has no substance, so what's the point of him being front & center and self indulgent again? Anyway I smh at all these things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I liked Ryan bRown they could have kept him but got rid of his Mac. Jack did Billy wrong because they made Katherine & Jill mother & daughter. Is that what your referring too Deeedee? See I had no problem with that. That's why I didn't see Jack Smith did something wrong. But LML writinging Billy as a sufer dude. Those fumes defintely was sipping throuh her scalp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hate Maria. On one hand, today had alot of good things in it. Tricia Cast was brilliant, and Nina is the best thing this show has right now. Mac and Kay and their heart to heart was lovely, and Nick and Jack's scene was tender and good... FINALLY they start playing on the Stepfather/stepson dynamic with those two. And Stafford today is burning like a supernova, her and Haiduk are INCREDIBLE together. And yet.... PHILLIP, what theyv'e done to him!!!! Bring him back from the dead just to ship him off. And THIS BITCH wants us to believe a man whose Ex-wife had to hold his hand, and nearly FORCE him to tell Jill and Kay that he likes to suck dick just WEEKS ago, is NOW going to go back to Australia to bravely protect CANE from evil cattle rustlers? REALLY? And this was supposed to be our long term committment to gay characters, after all the press? After all the publicity Thom and us fans gave her and this show? I just feel USED. F@CK YOU Maria.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I found it to be a rather odd way to deal with a character departing for parts unknown.
    • Today reminded me as to why I’m a little disappointed in the name that the new Pope chose

      Please register in order to view this content

      Luckily, EJ and Johnny, and pretty much every other character saved today’s episode.  I didn’t expect Javi to be the one to save Sarah though, and I don’t mind it at all, because if it means that Javi is finally going to get his own identity/character, away from his douchy bf, I’m all for it. Javi’s scenes would’ve been a lot better had it not been for him. EJ and Johnny were the best part of today. Their conversation hit a lot of important beats and I’m so looking forward to seeing them play out. And now that EJ knows that Johnny is going to work for Xander, that opens up another dynamic to their storyline and to the Kiriakis family storylines as well. Tying them all together could be really good. There are so many story possibilities that can come out of this. And I thought Carson Boatman did a pretty good job again too.  I also liked that Johnny was there to comfort Chanel after everything that happened with Sarah. They’re so good together. But I do have mixed feelings about Chanel possibly forgiving Johnny so quickly. Hopefully, the question that she asked him at the end of today leads to more conflict for the two of them.  And yeah, still no changes in Alex’s character lol 
    • Awesome, thanks so much for taking the time to grab this episode. I had a quick review of your rip because I was curious why it was 700MB and 30 minutes. The first 10 minutes of the episode is 3169 (opening credits at 5 minutes and again at 15 minutes). I thought we had the full HD version of ep.3170 on the YouTube channel, but it appears they added the wrong episode but labelled it 3170. 
    • I guess, according to Mike Manning in the Michael Fairman chat, he was almost Derek 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • OIC Thanks. I saw thzt & looked for a prior  ... never mind. 
    • I imagine Brad will blow through all the money in a year and come crawling back, just as Portia warned him not to.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • That's a name I haven't heard in a minute. Thanks! 
    • Well, since I'm still up unexpected past my growing-into-it bedtime. lol.   I finally got to rewatch Monday's. I even rewatched Friday's to take it all in. Now that we got the reveal and hit the climax of the SilkPress Sheila storyline, now we get to watch the aftermath and/or turns that come with its climax. So far, so good. Friday left us with three cliffhangers. And what I found surprising was how I felt about them over a rewatch.    I know some of you all felt a way about the dialogue during Kat vs Eva. I remember liking it more the first time around and it was nice for them to have these scenes to establish more of a frenemy vibe for them going forward. That still held up. But I found myself agreeing with you all about that dialogue. lol. Still, it was nice to have both of their POVs.   Second up was Silk Press Sheila vs the Duprees. And I was happy to get a brief spat with Dani in there. But the rest standouts for me was Anita and Martin. Haters can hate and given the tail end of the episode, I will agree to a fault, but Brandon has impressed and he was on fire on Monday and had great subtle work on Friday. And that subtle work made it all the better. Like I believe I said when I was watching...BC has a much better grip on his character and seems to be realizing what his tics are so has started to be able to know when to turn it up and when to dial it down. And for the most part (emphasis on most), he got that. Meanwhile, TT was giving fierceness, and I was here for every minute of it. Her reading SilkPress. Her being quip about it. Her 'BE STILL.' Ooooo she had a chokehold on me as Anita gave what I was expecting her to SilkPress. WORTH THE WAIT. I also loved Vernon's CHOOSE SILENCE. I wonder though if SilkPress will figure out Martin's condition from her observing Anita and Vernon with him.   And speaking of worth it...Oooo YES Nicole vs Ted was worth totally worth it. Oooooo I knew DD would nail it, and it was all so well done. The fight between the part of Nicole who is a therapist vs Nicole as a woman who wants to express how she feels. And being so angry. And how there would be moments when it would shoot out of her. And how she would restrain herself. But how she felt she should not be restrain. Just the levels of processing and layers. And DD played it all so well. I do wish Maurice gave just a little bit more, but overall, I thought he did a good job even if it was just Ted coming across as a deadbeat and not at all redeemable. And Kat being there for her mother was so beautiful.   Minority, but I love the montage though yes, it did run a little long. Given how the Duprees like to bond (and also as I mentioned from my own very recent family experiences), it did not seem out of place to me.     That said...let's see how the aftermath worked in today's episode. Overall. Cuz RC can be hit or miss. 
    • I wonder whose brilliant (

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) idea it was to do an almost complete rip-off of the "who killed Tom King"-storyline. That's some quality style writing right there.....  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy