Jump to content

Peter Bergman


Recommended Posts

  • Members

complete and utter word to all of this.

i watch clips of him from the 90's and earlier this decade and wonder, what happened? He just seems to read the lines now. He doesnt embody jack, He doesnt bring him to live and make him breath. And yes i do blame PB for that not the writing. True there is only so much you can do with crap, but damn you can do something with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Not being a watcher of Y&R I always associate him with "Cliff". Nina and Cliff were going full throttle when I started watching soaps and I guess they along with Jenny and Greg were the two big couples on AMC. There was a huge wedding at some estate and Nina was in a big hat. He was always good as Cliff, and the days of Nina, Cliff and Palmer were some of AMC's best and it wouldn't have worked without Cliff.

And yet, his biggest contribution to the culture will probably be the fact that while he wasn't a doctor, he played one on TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL!

I remember that amazing gothic drama. That is when I loved AMC. Myra Murdock always skulking around the corner in dark garb, but we never knew why. Palmer hiding Nina's diabetic retinopathy so she would be dependent, and so that she'd nobly stay away from Cliff (and with Palmer). Palmer pursuing "Monique" with his dobermans. That amazing wedding. Sybil Thorne getting pregnant. The vile Sean Cudahy.

It was in this era, I seem to recall, that at least parts of the Jenny-Greg-Liza stuff was starting (am I right?). And Jesse-Angie not long thereafter. The show was can't miss for me back then.

This was as significant a redirection of AMC (away from Tara-Phil-Chuck and that era) as Bill Bell's near-concurrent shift from the Newmans and Abbotts. And it was TERRIFIC. Alas, as time went on, they dropped the thread. Now, most of the greats from that era don't even have a footprint on the show in the next generation. Opal's still there, and Jesse-Angie are back. And not-Liza, I guess. But none of it feels connected to that glorious past.

Knowing Cliff as that sap, I had an extra-hard time accepting Peter as Jack. But he did win me over eventually. Around the time he pursued Nikki (and Victor chased them down in his jet), I was starting to buy into this version of Jack. I could see why Jack had to become a viable romantic lead to serve as a counter-point to Victor. I realized, when Nikki and Jack were married, that Terry Lester could never have pulled off that arc. Because Jack and Nikki had to have a marriage that was less passionate than Nikki-and-Jack. Melody had to constantly play restrained with Peter. I don't think she was able to play restraint as well with Terry--not from my memory, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Same here! Cliff and Nina were one of my very first soap couples. Nina, Cliff, Sybil Thorne, Palmer chasing Daisy down with dobermans... *sings* Those were the daaaayyys

And Bless his heart, "I'm not a doctor but I play one on TV" is now a permanent part of American culture because of Peter Bergman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sounds like Amanda Beall's rearing her ugly head. Everyone was "getting" each other whenever she wrote.

He started on AMC the year I was born, and left the year I became a habitual viewer. I was too young to critique anyone's acting let alone have any recollection of him as Cliff. I was in junior high by the time I realized "Cliff" was on Y&R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ugh. Yuck. I hope that's not a Peter Bergman and Ronn Moss comparison.

IMO, I don't think Peter Bergman is overrated. Eric Breaden, absolutely. Ronn Moss, I feel like he is always being propped. He's so tragic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Over the years,Bergman has made Jack his own and delivered some sensational performances,but i think he has gotten a little stale in recent times,despite his best efforts.

A lot has to do with the writing.

The Victor retrospective shown last week of the Victor/Jack feud ,highlighted the repetitive nature of the story.it seemed like the same scene being played over.

It's time to move on or rest it for a while.

Jack should move into a patriachal role in the family.Remember that Jerry Douglas was younger than Bergman when he was introduced.

Jack should be rebuilding Jabot,controlling a wayward Billy,reconnecting with Keemo and Kyle.

No more marriages where Jack ends up looking like a fool.

Maybe a new rival that would see him and Victor have to team up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also think he's overrated. I don't see a huge difference between 'Cliff Warner' and 'Jack Abbott' other than location and time. The storylines are different but everything else is the same. PB is good a what he does, but he's not especially good at transforming himself in the new role. His characters are always 'stiff'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even though I am not his biggest fan, I see a HUGE difference between Cliff and Jack.

Witness the chair-throwing scene that was flashed back last week. Cliff would NEVER have done that. Bergman says he "stole" heavily from James Mitchell and David Canary. I see that. When he has to plumb Jack's darker depths, he goes to that Adam/Palmer place (well!). When he's lushly romantic Jack...that's Cliff Warner. I loved Cliff, but I dislike the "Cliff-side" of him in Jack...it doesn't ring true with Terry Lester's creation of the character. Jack should be a life-long lech who only wants women for one thing. A part of him could crave wanting more...but it's not really in Jack to love a woman selflessly. That's why I hated the Luan story, or how much Jack lost himself in Nikki.

I remember on interview with Terry Lester in which he complained about Bergman being rewarded with an Emmy when he made such very different "choices" with Jack. I wish I could find that interview. It was kind of sour grapes, and kind of incredulous. Subtext: "This dude is NOT playing Jack Abbott".

But I've come to accept Bergman's version...sappy at times, nasty edge at other times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh wow, I would love to see that article.

I like PB as an actor and as Jack. In the clips I've seen of Terry Lester in the role, I really enjoyed him. I definitely can detect the different ways in playing the character. If fate had taken a different toll, I would have loved for Cliff to never have been written out of AMC as I've always loved the Cortlandts and I wish things worked out different for TL and his version of Jack.

And I agree with TL, LLB was sucking up way too much airtime. I never liked her or Christine. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
    • It's been a while, but we have seen the foyer to Bill and Hayley's house as well as the exterior entrance to their house. The foyer was first seen in the premiere episode when Hayley met Vanessa at the house.
    • There's still a year or two before Larkin arrives. Joel is there already. EON does noticeably youthify, although I think they carry it off. Admittedly I haven't seen most of the Jody stories, which from what people here have said aren't great.
    • I don't mind the actor who plays Brian. He's fine. The problem for me is that Paige seems so wishy wishy. She doesn't seem to have much of a personality at this point so I don't see why Brian would be so besotted with her. She just lurches from one trauma to the next. Granted, it's only been a month, but she's not as vibrant as April or even Deborah who has had minimal screen time by this point.  I do worry about the influence of GH on the show since I'm in fall of 1979 and characters have conversations and there's not the drive to "youthify" the show. However, I think Marceau (sp?) is gone. He was given a rather tame sendoff. How long was the actor on the show? I hope this is not a sign of things to come. I worry the show is setting up a murder mystery around one of my favorite characters and I will be mightily annoyed. I also noticed in recent Search for Tomorrow episodes uploaded to YT that the actors playing Logan and Eliot showed up. I don't watch the show but they were in the screencaps. When does Larkin Malloy show up or has he already left? Joel Crothers hasn't shown up either unless I've blinked and missed him.
    • Dr Linden. She treated Vanessa's drug addiction (although Vanessa seemed to forget that by Henry's suicide attempt) , and she's mentioned during Reva's PPD. Although I can't recall if she's actually shown right off the top of my head. She probably was temporarily shelved when Sonni was a therapist (between her crazy times) And I think Billy sees her after he falls off the wagon after Reva's death.
    • Kinda agree. I have some issues with the sets. Nicole's living room is bland-looks like a display home. Bill and Hayley's is too small and basically hideous. And neither of them have a front door/entrance or staircase. People just appear from the corridor. Those green accents  at Uptown are way too much. Also,Naomi and Vanessa not having an office or a home .
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  That Grainger story always reads like hog-wild melodrama, not very similar to the more subtle stories for Rita in her last few years. I wonder how Lenore played the material.
    • More from 1976 Lynn, apparently making every effort to overcome her alcoholism, accepts a baby-sitting job. However, when the baby starts crying, Lynn begins to get nervous and takes one drink, then another. By the time Bruce and Van arrive home, Lynn is on the floor, ineffectually trying to find the doctor’s number, sure the baby is ill. When the mother arrives; she vows to let everyone know what goes on in the mayor’s house.Bruce insists that Lynn has to go, but Van, learning that Lynn can’t remember drinking the cooking sherry, calls Joe to report Lynn’s blackouts. Joe wants her institutionalized but gives in to Van’ s pleas that Lynn needs loving attention. Eddie has sent some of Felicia’s work to a New |York gallery owner and reports to Charles that Lisa Cooper wants to exhibit Felicia’s work. Charles refuses to tell her this and later admits he feels he has “cowed”her attention because of his being confined to a wheelchair. What Charles doesn’t say is: that he’s plagued with fears she’ll leave him for another man. Felicia is exuberant as she starts painting again. She tells Charles how she feels about it, but, jealous of anyone or anything that takes attention from him, Charles tries to undermine her confidence. Eddie finally professes his love for her. He will be happy to step forward if she will only let Be and admit that they belong together. Charles tries to stop Felicia’s ‘trip to New York by making her doubt her own work, and when that fails, he finds business reasons at his bookshop to keep Di, his ex-wife, who is running it for him, from accompanying her. Felicia finally decides it’s not going to work and tells Eddie they might as well call it off. Instead, he arranges for Lisa Cooper to come to Rosehill. Charles is rude and insulting to Lisa when she arrives at the house to view Felicia’s work, and his derogatory remarks about shady gallery dealings prompt Lisa to tell Eddie that living in such an atmosphere could permanently stunt an artist’s development; if Felicia is subjected to this indefinitely, it’s not even worth Lisa’s while to take her on as a client. Felicia finally decides she can’t be torn apart any longer and must accede to Charles’s demands. She tells Eddie her career is over and she won’t paint any more, breaks down in his arms, crying bitterly, then pulls away, unwilling to acknowledge that her feelings for him are deeper than she dare face. Charles is delighted when she prepares to dispose of her art supplies, insisting everything will be fine once she has accepted that this part of her life is over. But she cannot do it. She promises him that he can set the limits and terms, but she must paint. Arlene discovers that her mother is planning to avoid the surgery she needs, and the accompanying medical bills, by leaving Rosehill and moving in with her sister Dorothy out west. Arlene manages to prevent this by calling her aunt and telling her the truth about Carrie’s condition. Dr. Tom Crawford has been footing the costs of Carrie’s presurgery tests, but Arlene knows that Carrie won’t like this. So she tells Carrie that David Hart, the son of Meg’s late husband, the former mayor, has heard about their plight and forwarded the money as a gesture of friendship, to be repaid when possible. To convince Carrie that she does indeed have the money, Arlene asks Ray to just lend it to her for a few hours, so she can convince Carrie and then immediately return it. Ray instructs her to get dressed for a night on the town and takes her, out implying that the money will be waiting at the end of the evening. When Ian Russell happens to join them, Arlene doesn’t suspect anything is afoot, but when e Ray suddenly leaves, she becomes furious, realizing what he’s done. But she finds Mr: Russell a distinguished and cultured man, and decides there’s no harm in having a drink. After cocktails and stimulating conversation, Ian suggests that they go to his place, and Arlene agrees. But when they get there, Ian matter of factly suggests that they skip the preliminaries and get on with it. Ian is embarrassed and annoyed to discover that Arlene is not a professional call girl and that Ray didn’t explain to her the purpose of their |meeting. He is apologetic and solicitous, until Arlene, explaining why Ray felt he could pull this on her, mentions her sick mother in need of an operation. Ian starts to laugh at this overworked standard line, and a livid Arlene storms out of his apartment. Thinking it over, Ian decides he’s more intrigued with Arlene than he is annoyed at Ray, and calls Ray for her telephone number. But Arlene is not delighted to hear from him, and he has to use a good deal of soothing charm before she agrees to have dinner with him at one of the better local restaurants.During dinner Ian again apologizes for his mistake, and he gives Arlene a diamond pendant as a token of his gratitude for her forgiving him. Ray arrives to interrupt an otherwise enjoyable evening with a business matter, and quietly reminds Arlene that Ian is his customer and she’s not to cut herself in with him. At home, Arlene examines the pendant and is convinced that it’s genuine. She hides it in her dresser drawer, unable to bring herself to show it to her mother.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy