Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Yeah, it doesn't seem to have been well thought-out as far as what would come after Meg was born. Dramatizing the struggles of a family with a Down's child is basically the antithesis of what these shows have been trying to do for the past 15-20 years. I just haaaate dangling threads like that. It bugs the crap out of me that Holly that this daughter with special needs (and Blake a little sister) and she was never even referenced for the last decade of the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always liked it too. I always thought of it as Vanessa's home, as I always thought of that weird place that was built into a mountain, or whatever, as Reva's place. I know a lot of older fans hated the latter and wanted Reva back in "Revabend," or as it was called by then, "Hollybend."

Wow the GL ladies did a lot of house swapping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't mind Vanessa's new home, I rather enjoyed seeing the set in a few episodes from late 1993 and so forth(the episode where a recast Billy has or will shoot Roger). Just was using it as a example of another one of JFP's quirks that was conceived on GL.

Carl, I recently watched the episode of where that particular home of Revas caught on fire and Michelle was trapped inside. From the camera angles and etc. I suddenly gained a new liking of that set,

Among Vanessa's many homes while on the show, the one that Matt built was my least favorite, for multiple reasons :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That house never felt like a home to me, mostly because it epitomized Vanessa being weak and written as some burden to Matt. I also have awful memories of stupidity like Dinah getting identical nightgowns for herself and Vanessa so Matt would try to make a move on her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I simply never and will never understand the Matt/Vanessa pairing.

I think it was an early example of JFP trying to live out her own fantasies vicariously through characters on her shows. She later did it with Vicki and Nora on OLTL.

There's an article from 1992 where Maureen Garrett talks about how much better the production values are on the show than when she first joined. They credit JFP for a lot of it.

http://articles.lati..._cbs-soap-opera

Edited by Y&RWorldTurner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Supposedly that was supposed to be a short term story which then took off because of viewer popularity. I think the initial idea may have been for Josh/Vanessa.

I never liked Matt and I thought he was kind of patronizing and empty, but mostly I was annoyed at the endless implications of Matt/Dinah and the show's obvious eagerness for this pairing. I think GL resented that "Mattessa" fans fought against Matt/Dinah. I'm glad it never happened - or that it at least when it did, Vanessa got to exit the relationship with some dignity and finally got together with Billy again. All of this mostly happened offcamera, and more should have been done, but it was still better than anything she had under Laibson/McTavish, or Rauch.

Edited by CarlD2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember it was suppose to a short-term affair and then they were to be paired off with other people... I wondered if Josh/Vanessa were the intended goal...imho, I think it would have been interesting especially if Billy returned after they hooked up.... what coud have been LOL

I recall that Lucy and Matt were suppose to be paired... or at least were tested (i remember several scenes where Matt/Lucy bickered and annoyed each other.... and then it was dropped... I even think they tested Lucy with Josh briefly as well.)

Michael,

Holly having a down syndrome baby was created by Mctavish.. and at the time, the plan was to showcase parents raising a down syndrome children.. ... I think the regime changes put a kibosh on that...and I think Holly becoming the nursery rhyme stalker was a result of her being a horrible mother to Blake and Meg. And they did mention Meg a few times in early 2000's.... and I hear there were suppose to be scenes between Fletcher/Holly in 2009. but they didn't happen for some reason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't know that about 2009.

I remember the endless, and boring, Alan-Michael/Lucy stuff. I guess one reason it was so endless was the show was looking for other options, yet never seemed fully committed (remember the thrilling Alan-Michael/Tangie story). Such a wasted character. They shold have put him with Gilly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They def did test Lucy/Josj, I remember Josh saving Lucy off of some rooftop in 5thstreet during some disaster. I also remeber the Matt/Lucy story.

I def did not like Matt/Vanessa because I knew right off the bat it wasnt supposed to be long term and shouldve been short term, the characters didnt fit enough to be long term imo. I wouldve def gone with Vanessa and Josh because off all the soryline potential and the history of the charcters. They def teased a Josh/Bam pairing during Reva's PPDO story and hsouldve weent there after she dided; Harley shouldve been a spoiler for those two I def did not like Harley and Jsoh. I never understood the appeal of Harley lol.

Def liked the AM/Tangie potential pairing with Alan as a spoiler and def LOVED AM and Gilly, uh AM and Lucy sucked arse , so boring.

One thing I hated about the Cooper's is they were all the same, there was absolutely no diversity in the family; Harley, Lucy, Marina were basically the same character as were Frank and Buzz, even Nadine and Eleni turned out to be the same character, ugh disliked the Coopers as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Oh wow. After reading your post, I realized that they had "Carl Ivati" in the script AGAIN yesterday June 6.    Eva said she was reading his latest, and Tomas said "Work's been so busy, I haven't had time to get into his new series". Then Eva proceeds to tell him that "the first book is called 'Mercy and Goodness' and it's all about how the couple first met and how they got separated".   She goes on and on about how great it is. And she says she has the book in her hotel room if he wants to borrow it. She says it has twists and turns. And meanwhile Kat is snooping in Eva's room to look for the helmet and gloves, and finds the book and dismisses it as "basic". I saw that whole scene -- but I wasn't paying attention to the name of the author.  And when Tomas said the name, I heard it in his accent so I didn't hear "carlivati".  II was mainly trying to see if the acting had improved with the actor playing Tomas, and I think he has improved somewhat.   I only see it when typed out. So they had several scenes yesterday about a "Carl Ivati" book?  Barf! Well at least Kat had the good sense to dismiss it as "basic". Ron Carlivati wrote the breakdown yesterday!   Featuring himself in it! Addressing to the collective "you" whoever you may be: Some of you, months ago, said Oh Ron is only doing breakdowns.  The story comes from MVJ, so he won't influence things, you said. May 27 started it, with Christopher Dunn breakdown and Lynn Martin script. But they didn't need to continue it June 6 with Carlivati breakdown and Jazmen Darnell Brown script.
    • I was completely lost. But it is wonderful that it exists. I didn't really know Robert Mandan had done soaps...well, besides SOAP.
    • Jack and Jennifer are tired. I just don't care about them when they return. They add nothing to the show.
    • Did they really bring back Jack and Jennifer for Jack to prop up Leo and Jenn to serve as an obstacle to Chad/Cat? Are we sure Ron still isn't in the building?
    • We can only hope that they finally kill off Leo too 
    • We can only hope that maybe the new writers might read this.
    • You can get so many storylines from a Will/Sonny/Paul/Andrew/Dimitri mess And I'm sure Colton would do a great job 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Sounds interesting. Too bad we never got that story.
    • Not to go too off topic but if you ever want to see more of his Search run just look for SFT Summer of 1966 on Youtube.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy