Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Agreed, I like that it is aspirational without being flashy.  They all have careers, dinner parties, and nice homes, without being princes, or super villains.  It seems like it is always trying to be a heightened reflection of the culture at the time.  Even the discussions of family planning seem so much more evolved that the baby crazy women portrayed on soaps today.  Jackie isn't trying to ensnare Alan in order to mother Phillip, she is pragmatic that Phillip was close to his father and marrying him was a good way to join the family; also Alan was unusually magnetic when he wanted to turn on his charm.    

 

Jackie and Justin were so groovy it is hard to believe what a wet sock Samantha turned out to be, but her casting was an excellent use of history given the SORAS-ing of Alan-Michael.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

 

You're right about Jackie's motives. She wasn't some pre-menopausal woman with a biological clock ticking who was trying to reclaim a son. She was a woman who wanted to be part of her son's life, and as you say, join the families together. Her motives were fairly pure. Cindy Pickett was superb in this portrayal and I could never really take to the recast. This said I don't think she should have been killed off in a plane crash, that seemed like a mistake.

 

The reason I really love this storyline about Philip's parentage is because it becomes an open secret. A lot of modern soap writers make it all about keeping people in the dark. But as this story went on, all the adults knew the truth. They kept it from Philip to protect him. That is why several headwriters were able to keep it going for seven years of airtime. The adults were not in a rush to reveal it to him. Today's writers get too impatient and want the big ratings episode where the bombshell is dropped six months later. But it became more interesting and more involving for it to just continue along, with all these extra layers added. It made the story much more powerful and the ramifications run that much deeper.

 

The fact that both mothers were not around when Philip finally learned the truth hurt the story a bit at the end, in my opinion. We really needed to see Philip confront all four of them. He should have visited Elizabeth wherever she was, and he should have gone to Jackie's grave. Instead, it became more about him and the two fathers. After Justin left it became more about Philip and Alan, with Ross there as a sounding board.

 

The aged Samantha didn't work for me, because I think Long brought her on as a sister to Philip more than anything else, instead of making her into a lead character that could stand on her own. It didn't surprise me when Suzy Cote left two or three years later and the part was never recast. In fact I don't even remember Philip mentioning Sam after 1995, did he?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

The revelation had been anticipated for years but Long and Culliton bungled it. The reveal with Phillip learning the truth from Bradley in the country club stables happened sometime in August 1983 as I recall. Within a month, Justin was gone...off to Arizona. The following spring, Alan was written out. So all four of the key adults in the story were gone. Such missed opportunities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I wholeheartedly endorse these views.  It worked because it was a story about the parents.  Today the whole story would be told from Phillip's POV, but that was the least interesting part.  I'm guessing there were some influences from OLTL's long running Jenny Woleck baby switch story; it is as if there was a competition to see which soap secret could be kept the longest.  I believe as long as the audience knows a soap secret it works, its when a secret is held for months, and then explained with long exposition scenes, that do nothing to intrigue me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Another mistake soap writers make, and the British soaps make this mistake too, is they think the whole town needs to find out about the secret. No, it should only involve those in the immediate orbit of the story. That's what made the Dobsons' tale so effective-- it was not about all of Springfield knowing the truth about Philip's parentage. It was this one extended family dealing with it.

 

The story about whether Roger or Ed was Chrissie's father was also handled expertly by the Dobsons. It just affected the Bauers and Thorpes. People on the wrong side of tracks across town did not need to be drawn into it.

 

Going back to my earlier point about the chaotic 80s. In addition to so many new families and characters being added, the show added too many new sets. Back when the Dobsons were writing, it was really just Cedars and the homes of the core families. Maybe a small set was used for Mike's office, which probably also doubled as Alan's office, shot from a different angle. They did not need Company, suites of offices at Spaulding Enterprises, Frank's chop shop, the Beacon Hotel, Towers, the courthouse, WSPR, Springfield U, Lewis Oil, and so on and so forth. The Dobsons wisely kept the action centered at the hospital and inside the homes of the main families. Again, they kept things basic.

Edited by JarrodMFiresofLove
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 I realize why they did this in the 80s and 90s...all the shows were doing big multi sets and since the "critics' were always kind of dissing the P & G soaps as not being as 'hip" as the ABC soaps..(apparently Geary's fro was very hip for daytime at that time..)they had to do it.  But GL's budget problems could have been help along as I said before, by just having less sets built.. but really good sets built on the ones they do. I see a really good Cedars set lobby...I would have Beth and Holly both set up a rape crisis center in Cedars so it makes sense they are walking around, have Olivia leave the Spaulding sphere and be the hospital administrator, Alex take charge of the Spaulding Foundation so she can spar with Liv and flounce around the halls, have Alex take Dinah in as her assistant to keep an eye on her...build a mayor's house set for the Mahlers it make sense that people are coming in and out all the time...keep Company as that would be a community get together, keep the Towers set for blow outs and fancy dinners...keep the old Spaulding living room set for infighting drama, the Bauer kitchen and that Lighthouse hotel thing would be condos and just show the lobby as people come in and out and talk and gossip and fight and engage in bitchy repartee with each other.

 

I think the other thing was that all the P & G soaps should have kept their styles instead of trying to be ABC "hip." ATWT was always the midwestern "family heartfelt show, while GL always seemed more "sophisticated and upcrust."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Which is the Peapack experiment didn't work on GL because the show was always about the upper middle class and the upper class with the Reardon's, than the Coopers, being working class on the upward swing.  The sets were upper crust, but not over the top.   Even Reva's (later Holly's) house in the rougher part of Springfield looked comfortable and cozy.  The Peapack experiement made it seem like it was a poor, struggling town (even though Spaulding and Lewis Oil were still big players).. perhaps if the show had picked a more ritzy town in New Jersey.. it could have worked.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually Peapack is upper crust and beautiful..(Reva's aborted wedding to Kyle was filmed there..) and so many places could have doubled as SF locations.,,the Wildwood Arboretum would be a great stand in for places in the Jessup farm and the grounds of the Spaulding mansion..you would think they would love to have the blurb "Filmed at..." in the credits. P & G was just too cheap and unimaginative to do things like that so we were stuck with the junk in Harley's back yard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yes, I agree...that would have been better. I think Rita had reached the end of her dramatic shelf life. But Elizabeth had more life in her, from a writing standpoint. She should have been brought back later. She could have been someone Alex brought to town again to rattle Alan.

 

Plus I always wanted to see Lizzie have scenes with the grandmother she was named after.

 

I also think Hope should have been brought back. Elizabeth and Hope were two legacy characters that could have added a lot to later storylines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Indeed, Peapack is upper crust and beautiful. It's lovely. As I've mentioned before, what could have worked was for Guiding Light to film on occasion in New Brunswick, which isn't far from Peapack. New Brunswick is a bit more similar to what we saw with pre-Peapack Springfield -- a university, hospitals, urban areas, tall buildings, beautiful parks. With Rutgers University (where I work) right in town, they could have used the college setting to re-establish Springfield University.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I had suggested before that Edmund was the real Spaulding heir...I have no idea who you would work the mechanics with that one but we have had clones and paitings as portals to time travel..so.  I didn't really like Edmund but I loved DAM and he would be more the age and no..Gus was not a Spaulding it was all a big mistake...

 

I actually think they should have brought a "new" character on for the real Spaudling heir...a blue collar guy but this time, unlike Lujack etc...really, really happy to be super rich and he would be ruthless like Alan. It would be a nice add on angst if Prince Phillip got a real rival that was more then happy to be Alan's son. I can't believe they never went there. Instead of Alex Collins could have been Elizabeth..having found out her kids really survived...(no doubt Brandon was involved with faking his death) hiding it all of these years.

 

Also, they could have establish an internship program with PG and the university..using cheap production labor (hey we all did it) in exchange for experience..including the writing staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I think we all agree that it was the tone not the location that was the problem with The Wheeler Experiment.  They could have been strolling through the most luxurious cites in New Jersey, but the focus on monotheistic values and punishing aspirational characters put me off after one viewing.

 

 

Oddly, Alan's one redeeming quality is that he never brought the issue of biology into his relationship with Phillip.  He fought harder for custody of Phillip than for Alan-Michael, then he shot Roger, and went to prison, in order to protect Phillip.  Alan-Michael had a problem with the fact was Alan wasn't Phillip's biological son, but to his credit,  Alan never made it a concern. 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

The Spauldings didn't need any more long-lost kin crawling out of the woodwork. Esenstein & Harmon Brown tried to revisit the Jamaica story from the mid-80s by bringing a young Victoria Spaulding on to the show in the late 90s. But after a solid introduction she quickly became just another token black character who stopped appearing after a year or so. I don't even think Labine, Gold, Weston or Kreizman ever addressed what happened to her. Did she die? Did she go back to Jamaica? It was like she had never existed. At one point she was living in the Spaulding mansion and involved with David Grant, another token black character who didn't amount to much in the scheme of things.

Edited by JarrodMFiresofLove
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There was a scene in the past week or two with Leslie looking at some papers and mementos, which included an invitation or souvenir from Alan's memorial service or funeral -- it was dated as November 2024. Me just guessing but it seems to me that Martin's nightmares about the accident are from something longer ago than November.
    • ah thanks! do you know who the third one was in the blonde? the fifth one i know ive seen before in the brown wig but i forgot, and then ive never seen the psychic one before lol
    • I felt for Ted early on but as the story unfolded it has changed my opinion on him. To know he was cheating while his wife was struggling to give him a baby is a lot to deal with. Plus, this happened ages ago and still he's paying Leslie off and threatening her to leave town.  What really caused me to lose him in this episode was how even though he was busted, he still refused to take responsibility and come clean and the way he talked to Martin and Eva was terrible. To tell Smitty he better get Martin away from him when that is his SON who he used to cover up his affair? That is true dog behavior. Ted seems upset he got caught but I'm not seeing the remorse I would need to want Nicole to forgive him. I'm curious how I'll feel after Ted gets to talk to Nicole but I need him to fix it with the rest of the family as well.
    • I'm sorry. I well remember Jake doing Doris but I have no independent memory of the story around it.  Krystle with a K Lake, sure, both Tony the Tuna stories & NOT.  And, Jake also impersonated a woman named Bunny Eberhardt but he didn't know she was a woman so there was no drag. This weekend I re-watched Kevin & Mac, GH, and my strong impression is exactly what it was when I watched it in real time: They did not let them look very pretty. Of course, I think the best ever drag on GH was Alexis posing as the Q butler.  In a different use of drag at AW one Halloween, Jensen Buchanan went as Charlie Chaplin & Judi Evans went as, I think, a male gypsy.   

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I'm not sure who wanted them to dump REUNION & instead do a "Dallas-like daytime show" but it seems that it def came from NBC to AW through Rauch, so, yes, it absolutely could have been his (cough-another-stupid?) decision!!!! I've just begun the new Lisanti book so maybe I will find out. (I waited for the kindle version to come out.) I would apologize for being so critical & so sarcastic, too, but, well, I'm not actually sorry!  Silverman was NOT a friend to AW.  And, I believe the critique is on point & deserved! I wanted to explain why I think the timing is off for the 90 minute show to be a reaction to the GH Luke & Laura story & its hype. Because, for sure, networks & production companies did react to it! The first 90 minute show was Monday, March 5, 1979.  And, there was some unknown amount of time ahead of that with people arguing about it & then, planning it.  The Luke & Laura wedding was mid-November 1981.  They were on the run from Frank Smith & stayed overnight in Wyndham's Dept. Store early August 1980. 
    • terrible at using forums and inserting photos, but jake in another world had a drag persona named doris, anyone know the episode or year? http://www.anotherworldhomepage.com/ffad19.jpg
    • Yes, I am familiar with Fred Silverman. Agree, the 90 minute AW a very poor decision by Silverman. I think Silverman was behind the decision to go with Texas.
    • Thanks -- you're doing God's work The Gio reveal was everything I hoped for and more. GH got it right. Head to toe, GM is a stunning physical specimen.
    • I really wonder how they'll handle Netflix's usual long breaks between seasons. That girl is going to grow up fast... makes me wonder if this wouldn't have been a better fit for HBO Max considering they're leaning into a more broadcast style of production model with The Pitt.
    • I agree -- I didn't suspect Ted, either. I think a lot of people are giving themselves way too much credit in predicting Ted's problems

      Please register in order to view this content

      And can I have a different take on Ted here? Yes, he's made a huge mistake with this Leslie debacle, and yes, he has to suffer and pay for it. But does that make Ted a terrible human being? I don't think it does. He made a horrific mistake over 2 decades ago, and as far as we know, he's been a good husband and father since. As far as we know, he hasn't strayed or violated his marriage since. He didn't know that he fathered another child, and thought he "removed" Leslie from his life. I won't blame Nicole if she doesn't forgive him, but I also won't blame her if she decides what they have and what they've had more than makes up for what he did. Ted is getting dragged far more than Bill is on these boards, and I think Bill is MUCH worse as a husband and father. How many times did he cheat on Dani during their marriage? How many times did he do vile things in his role as fixer? How much did he hurt his daughters by screwing their friend and marrying her? With Keith Robinson coming in as Ted, maybe we'll see a character change in direction and we'll discover that Ted has many flaws and always had a dark side. For now, though, I'm inclined to both be angry with Ted for hurting his family while also sympathizing with him. I know what you mean, but I do think that was intentional. So much was going on in that episode, and I think they decided not to let Nicole's reaction be lost in all that. Nicole will get those scenes that you're asking for.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy