Jump to content

OLTL: Patricia Mauceri speaks about her firing


Recommended Posts

  • Members

It's about a grudge, Mark. Homophobia can be ignored and apologized for as long as we get the grudge on. I'd say there's a lack of courage for one's convictions involved, but clearly there isn't. It's just the wrong set of convictions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

No grudge. I just think they're all petty and moronic and not living in any sense of reality. Mauceri is a homophobe who stepped over the line and then ran to Fox News for back-up when she was fired for not doing her job, and Valentini is an egotistical, arrogant megalomaniacal ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only person that was done wrong in this equation was me for watching that drivel. It was horrible, over the top, out of character, the recast actress looked out of place and I don't even have the history with the show or the character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In what sense? I mean, are you saying that in relation to the Mauceri situation, or in another / others? I ask for that clarification because (1) that's popped up as if it were relevant or absolving for Mauceri and (2) I see other posters on here seeming to sing Mauceri's praises simply because they - for whatever reasons - can't stand Frank Valentini...

There shouldn't be an implied impression that hating-on-gays is "okay" because of some sentiment that the EP is a jerk. You understand where I'm coming from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I haven't always liked FV's actions or statements, in fact I was offended by some of his moves during the Higley era, but this is a case-by-case basis, and I'm with the above post. I'm not going to handwave homophobia just because someone in the production team may not be a nice person, and FV or RC's good or bad moves or choices with the show do not justify anything Patricia Mauceri's done, or the choices she chose to make. They aren't the homophobes who couldn't play tolerant material. It's show business, not auditioning for prom queen. Nobody worked to force Mauceri out, in fact they tried to work with her. She just couldn't do it.

Saying "well, I hate what they've done with the show so PM must've been right to be a homophobe" is not a valid excuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I strongly believe the homophobia and Carlotta Out of Character arguments were definitely off-topic. People all across the soap board universe have been using that argument in defense of Mauceri. "She was FIRED for her personal beliefs!" No, she wasn't. "OMG! LOOK at that horrible out of character reaction! Mauceri was right!" Who cares? That wasn't the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes that was more about my general dislike of the ABC boys club. And as for what Valentini and Carlivati have or have not done wrong, we'll just have to agree to disagree. Valentini has no credibility with me on anything and IMO Carlivati wasn't true to the character. Mauceri may have her head up her ass but that doesn't mean that she wasn't right on that one point. Ron screwed the character of Carlotta. If its not okay to "hate on gays" because of a dislike for the EP then let's not give bad writing a free pass because we like the backstage politics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But most people on this board and others say it was no big deal, that he didn't "screw the character of Carlotta" at all. It's not like there's been some groundswell of people claiming, "oh, I totally understand now!" Far from it. They're saying "that was it?" And they're right. And as has been demonstrated, it's not out of character for Carlotta to be understanding about homosexuality, because that material is in her past. I'm not giving "bad writing" a pass, because I don't feel the scene was bad writing; it's in Carlotta's history to be accepting of as many people as she's been judgmental against, including and specifically homosexuals, going back to the '90s. If you want to disagree, that's fine. But you happen to be wrong.

I don't think anyone "likes the backstage politics." What I really don't like, however, is an actor hiding behind a character's faith to try and be professionally closedminded, even though that faith has never stopped the character from being open-minded where the actor is not. And what I dislike just as much is people trying to exploit the issue to make another arbitrary attack on a production team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I totally agree. This one action hasn't ruined, screwed or drastically changed the Carlotta character in a negative fashion forever. It was a small thing the actress, foolishly, thought she had a chance at winning if she fought against it... and has turned into this huge thing that's been over done with for almost a week, already. People are just using it to either express their ignorance with homosexuality or their hatred with ABCD executives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Frank being a major douchebag comes way before this. I obviously can't tell any behind-the-scenes stories but yeah, he's a major jerk. So instead, I'll use an example from the Daytime Emmys which I thought was low. When OLTL won the directing emmy, he, of all people accepts the award, when it should've been Larry Carpenter. In 2008, Larry directed 65 epsidoes and Frank directed only 10 (the least amount of any OLTL director). Also, Larry directed the episode that won them the Emmy. If Frank was gracious, he would've let Larry speak, but of course not....it had to be about Frank. This is only a minor situation compared to other stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't see how Valentini being an ass is relevant in this situation either. Mauceri had problems with the writing for the character she played, she didn't want to play what was written, so they recast a role that wasn't even a contract role. Not like that hasn't been done a million times before with other recurring characters, not necessarily those who refused to play a role as written, but it is pretty standard.

The show was pretty set with the way they wanted the character to act, they didn't want to go back and rewrite scenes for a totally minor recurring character, which is understandable. Because really, how often is Carlotta on, and is she even an essential character to be getting all this attention? Whether those scenes were believable or not for the character is to be debated, but in the context of everything and the overall story, Carlotta isn't very essential anyway.

That said, Valentini does rub me the wrong way and I do not like the way he comes off in interviews, and what he did at the Emmy's was eye roll worthy. But if I were an EP and a recurring actress that likely isn't on for more than 10 episodes a year refused to play what was written, I wouldn't order rewrites for such a small part, I'd gladly recast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

PM totally messed up but Valentini clearly wanted to screw her while building buzz for Kish with an Engen-style scandal. And that all goes back to Brimike's post: "...they're all petty and moronic and not living in any sense of reality. Mauceri is a homophobe who stepped over the line and then ran to Fox News for back-up when she was fired for not doing her job, and Valentini is an egotistical, arrogant megalomaniacal ass." Valentini being an ass is relevant because this could've been managed much more professionally.

And for the record, Toups or anyone else should be able to express their dislike and/or distrust for Valentini without being accused of giving homophobia a free pass. The fact that he was is a perfect example of the "with us or against us" thinking that will screw this story. Valentini is as much a part of this as Mauceri.

Also I submit that while she isn't essential,Carlotta does mean a lot to a certain segment of viewers. The same way RJ and Hank aren't essential yet mean something to a certain segment of viewers. I could easily draw corollaries between RC's treatment of Hank's recent return and his treatment of Carlotta in this situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy