Jump to content

Y&R Episode Discussion for the week of July 20


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think that's just a lose-lose situation all around. Obviously they knew Sabrina and the chipmunk were not the smartest moves - Sabrina died within a year of being introduced, and the chipmunk only lasted seven episodes. So they find themselves in a situation where they either pretend it never happened, or they try and spin it out into something that works, instead of ignoring it.

I don't know how I feel. Part of me admires the tenacity to try and make lemons out of lemonade, but the other part of me just thinks they need to cut their losses and NEVER MENTION THESE THINGS AGAIN. But then people would complain that they're ignoring things that happened on-camera, whether they were happy with the original stories or not. Like Tad being the murderer/torturer on AMC. Worst story decision ever, and one that's just ignored now - and AMC fans grumble that it was dropped and never dealt with. So I'm at a loss myself as to what the best course should be in cases like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 277
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I was one outside of, like, three people (the other two prob being Eric Baeden and the actress herself) who actually grew to like Sabrina. But TPTB need to let her go. Brimike, I don't see the constant repetition of Sabrina/Chipmunk being TPTB's way of dealing with stories that didn't work. Mainly because the dialogue keeps trumpeting how Sabrina was the "love of Victor's life" (I would think the years he spent with Hope, Nikki and Ashley would overshadow the 4 months he had with Sabrina, tragic as her death was) and how the Silver Chipmunk is this "breakout" self-help metaphor allowing Kevin to make money, reconcile with himself and giving him new mini-SLs.

This isn't dealing with duds and tying up loose ends (something MAB can do quite well, actually). This is about perpetuating those damn SLs. As if TPTB were pissed at us, the stupid audience, for not "getting" their amazing creations. This is our second (and 3rd. And 4th!) chance to reconsider our error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I totally agree with you on the "love of Victor's life" dialogue. I think the tragedy of what happened to Sabrina and the baby speaks for itself. She doesn't need to be "the love of Victor's life" for it to motivate Victor to act/behave the way he did in the months after her death. I agree that bothers me as well.

I guess I don't see TPTB as being that arrogant. Foolish, maybe. Detached from their audience. But not arrogant. (I can already hear everybody typing the "What about the 'my vision' interview?!", and I just can't put that much stock in one sentence written a year ago in an interview that was obviously a retort to people saying Sheffer was the reason the show turned around after the Gala Car Crash, and nothing more.)

I could totally be in the wrong here. I just see a lot of decisions being made based on "We need to find a way to make something that didn't work somehow work". It's desperation, not arrogance.

Blah, blah, blah. In any case, I would be happy if they just let these stories go, in this case. I'm not nearly as bothered by Kevin wanting to get into the self-help business, as I am by the "Sabrina is the love of Victor's life" mentality. I'm not sure why - just a personal thing. I don't particularly like the chipmunk, but like I said before, as long as I never have to SEE the chipmunk again (and if we do, I will raise holy hell), hearing it mentioned doesn't really affect me one way or the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Despite the huge missteps of the past couple of months, on balance I like MAB's "vision" in that she has attempted to rectify what fans felt were big SL wrongs. And I don't think MAB is any more arrogant than any other Daytime HW. I honestly think that they are sticking with this "Sabrina 4-EVA" stuff because the marketing department built up a huge campaign regarding her death and it helped to bring back a few viewers who had been hitherto discontented with the show. So they obviously think they need to keep mentioning her because her death launched a bunch of new SLs and heralded the beginning of Hogan Sheffer's co-tenure.

But the Chipmunk is a universal dud and even MAB must realize that it didn't worked. Just like P3's return, while good on paper, has been a bust in terms of execution -- but there is still time to fix that. I wish they weren't bringing SC back but I think part of that is due to TPTB having no clue what to do with Michael, Kevin, Jana and the rest of the Baldwin circle. Eden hasn't been seen in weeks, thank goodness, and neither has Lauren. Maybe because this group's last couple of SLs have flopped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The fact is that both Thom Bierdz and Sean Kanan are NOT on contract, so hopefully MAB will see our reactions to their arrivals and decide if it is okay to keep them or not.

I'm okay with Cassie because she was a legacy character. French-talking Sabrina and that irritating chipmunk were nothing like her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh! I meant to say this before, and I forgot. I wonder if bringing up the Chipmunk stuff wasn't just a quick device to bring Kevin and Ryder into the same circle. Clearly, Ryder's using the Chipmunk stuff to worm his way into Kevin's life, so maybe it's just using it to introduce the character, as opposed to building an entire storyline around it.

That worries me too, only because the little we've seen of Wilson Bethel (sp?) I really, really like him. But he's already attached to two storylines the fans don't like (the art story and the chipmunk story), and both work against him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

MAB. Keep Sean Kanan!

Yes, it's a misogynist SL, blah blah. But I have such a soft spot for Deacon Sharpe, especially when he did his patented reptilian laugh yesterday. LOL.

^^ Oh, and sidekick Ryder is HOT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm another person who liked Sabrina, or at least saw potential in her. This gaslighting story would have been more believable with her, and an Adam/Sabrina relationship would have been good drama. It's sad to think that a 25 year character cannot create drama, but Ashley is a blank space in this storyline.

I was a fan of Sean's on GH and on B&B but I'd rather they not keep Deacon if this is the version of Deacon we are going to get. He didn't operate this way (he was a sleaze but never in the convoluted and frankly silly way he is in this story) and he never cared enough about Amber to justify his current obsession. He would be more likely to see Amber as pathetic, because this is a woman who has gone from having a husband, child, and career to acting like an overgrown teenager, spending all her time wailing and doing capers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wilson Bethel would have made a great Phillip IV, and he even fits in line with the thin boys that previously played the character. I also think he's in a more appropriate age range for the character than John Driscoll, who I guess, is OK for the part anyway.

But if Phillip IV were in the early 20's range, he'd be in with Lily and "Colleen" and I wouldn't wish that on anyone...

He's brainwashed, you know they'll go there. LOL!

I really like the actor, but I HATE that's he's tied to this stupid art story and is working his way in this Chipmunk MESS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I haven't seen Driscoll yet, but I hope he'll do good in the role. From what I've heard, it's writing that's completely destroyed the arrival of this character. Thankfully, Bierdz isn't on contract so maybe it'll help later on.

I hope not. He killed a man and he's already blacklisted in my book, just like Jana will ALWAYS be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Driscoll's good, but they did completely BOTCH the character's return and his reaction to seeing his very alive father. They haven't given the character much to do yet, except planting the seeds to a friendship with Chole.

Bierdz, just needs to go. This sooner this Phillip III storyline is forgotten the better, I think...

Oh, I agree, but look at how many criminals are on this show already, stuff like murder is not enough to send many of these characters away for good. They don't care about redeeming characters as much as they care about ignoring past crimes of certain characters or just totally whitewashing them.

And yes, this show has TOO MANY actors already, it's in DESPERATE need of some CAST CUTTING for both budget and story reasons. Too many characters are neglected already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The contract cast has its problems, but it is mostly still the same amount of people. However, we have around 20 recurring players and a lot of them are used more than half the contract cast.

Poor Tracey Bregman. Nothing since June 12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The last Phillip may be a hunk today on Gossip Girl, but he was actually a big boy when he played Phillip. I don't recall the boy during most of the 90s being what I'd call thin either. I don't know where you're getting that from.

On the subject of today's episode, I'm heartbroken! Kitty is gone!?! Where were the spoilers to prepare me for that? Where was the goodbye scene? Why didn't Mary Jane just grab him and put him in his carrier? WTF?! Is that truly it for Kitty? He was one of the saving graces for Y&R and I'm devestated by this loss. How could she even get him back at this point? I'm sure the police will collect all of her things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy