Jump to content

June 22-26, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

It was only a thought. Whatever is going on with GH on SoapNet I am sure it isn't good given the network's silence. For all the boasting about AMC and OLTL's increases, SoapNet's audience is so small that it is hard to believe that it is benefiting from the re-airings in any major way. It is not surprising that SoapNet is looking for inexpensive alternative programming.

I have seen the switch blamed for lower daytine ratings, but it is difficult for me to believe that Neilsen has thousands of boxes in the homes of elderly and poor people. Nielsen carefully screens the individuals in those homes they place those boxes or ask to fill out the diaries. Also, even those thousands of people are lost because of the switch, most of them not in the all so important 18-49 women demo that the advertisers prize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 227
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Except they're not looking to replace AMC, OLTL, or GH, because they're the most inexpensive programming they have--they cost nothing to them. And they're the two highest rated shows on SoapNet. And SoapNet is up 25% over last year. And it's now in the top 25 basic cable stations, on par with MTV, yet with more women 18-49 viewers.

In other words, much as I can't stand AMC....and I'm not all that fond of OLTL, either, lol....neither one is in any danger of dying anytime soon. They're keeping a very lucrative cable net afloat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I understand what you are saying but they just sank 3 million dollars into going hd with GH and now I don't see them getting anything in return with the bad ratings they have been getting. AMC and OLTL are least expensive than GH and they are getting better ratings than GH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually the first full week of the DTV switch was not last week it was the week before and the ratings for all ABC soaps were down same with Days and Y&R the rest of cbs went up so your right about them being down cause of the DTV switch but the DTV switch was 3 weeks ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IF AMC is doing so well on Soapnet, why are the marathons for the show shown at Midnight to 6 am Monday Mornings? :rolleyes:

Unfortunately we'll probably be stuck with Pratt for another year, let's just hope AMC makes it another year with him at the helm. The show is so disjointed, nothing makes sense day to day. Scenes like the one with Liza hugging Zach and Kendall seeing them, then nothing after that, I guess that's more of the off screen happenings Pratt is so fond of.

Oye

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The marathons are "encore" presentations, as when other cable nets air their popular shows for second and third times in overnight hours. It's the primetime ratings on SoapNet that tell the story, and AMC and OLTL are both doing phenomenally well in that regard.

And as I said before, they're "free" shows for SoapNet, so no matter how many times they air, and no matter where they air....the money from advertising is all profit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Where does it state that they are the highest rated shows, it only states that the shows received their highest ratings big difference. It seems like soapnet is more interested in original programming then being none as the station that shows repeats.

With the digital conversion I read that only 0.6 people over 55 have not converted a very small number which should no longer be used to justify the ratings drop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just because the soaps are free to SoapNet, it does not mean that there is no cost associated with airing them. The network has to pay people and use equipment to monitor the studio, send signals, etc. Ad revenue has to cover those costs as well as make profit. Frons definitely in a recent article that one of the reasons that they were looking for alternative programming was because not enough people were watching the repeats to bring the ad revenue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's what I'm trying to say "How can this be truthfully ascertained" if Y/R has 5 million viewers how do they get these #s when 5 million viewers don't have these boxes?"

I don't have Tivo or a Neilsen box so am I being counted? I record off WinTv. I watch Y/R online most of the time. People's viewing habits have technologically superceded some box from the 50's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know Neilson is the granddaddy of this stats thing, but the shows have so many other ways of assessing how many are truly watching. Perhaps rather than looking at what soaps have to change, perhaps we should be looking at different sources for information. If a company in Denmark (I think it was) can tell you who's texting the US from Iran, you know the technology exists to see who is tuning into the shows through cable or online or TiVo or any other number of ways you Americans are watching. (As a Canadian we are limited and not counted, so it's all intellectual to me.) And I find it rather difficult that we are all picking over the bones of the numbers for a technological system (appointment TV) that is itself a declining means of entertainment.

Arguable I'm still learning the whys and wherefores of this whole thing - and this thread has been most helpful - but are we truly seeing bad numbers for soaps or is it bad number recording systems?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not everyone is being counted because it is a sampling of the population, and yes Neilsen counts internet watchers also. We are only seeing part of the ratings the part that abc or Troups purchases there are also other indepth ratings available that breaks down demographics, etc.

I would like to blame the decrease in ratings numbers to the antiquated Neilsen also but the reality is that less and less viewers are tuning in over the years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly. I think part of the problem is that people do not understand that Neilsen draws a representative sample of the viewing habits of the American population since no one can count everyone. The advertisers of various products are only interested in specific types of viewers. Even with Neilsen counting Internet viewers, it is clear that there are less people watching not only daytime, but prime tv as a whole. For all the complaints about Neilsen, there is no evidence that their sampling strategy is flawed or antiquated. It is also possible if Neilsen changed it sampling strategy, the soaps would lose even more viewers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • And here I thought I'd never think about Lauren Tewes again after her brief appearance in Twin Peaks Season 3.
    • I may be the single person who does not mind Transatlantic Campy Pamela. I think it perfectly suits this sort of Absolutely Fabulous-esque supporting character she's playing much more than it did when Cady tried weird and often broad stuff at AMC* or Y&R, or later stints at ATWT. She's not Dixie and she's not trying to be. I will freely admit some of the other chances she took at other shows often came off stiff, hammy or downright mortifying (Kelly Andrews, come on down). (* - and I say that as one of the few who was somewhat into Cady trying to make Dixie more cosmopolitan in the Rosanna Cabot mold in mid-2000s AMC, just to liven the character up again)
    • There’s absolutely nothing exciting happening storyline wise but I’m always happy to see the vets on my screen so I’ll take what I can get. It’s also just nice to see them all dressed up in the same room, it always gives classic Y&R vibes. The best part? No Phyllis. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Well now we had Ashley's reaction-and weren't we all gasping when she appeared to hate it-but she was just joking!! She loved it. Now we have to see Abby's reaction, and maybe Mamie could come back to say she loves it. How about Jill via Zoom giving her opinion (she'll love it) and bring in a day player to play Mrs Martinez to say she loves it also... I feel bad to keep dumping on this show (not really) but when the choices they make are so inane, it's the only entertainment value the show has. Let's unpack the Nikki birthday story. So Claire wants to throw her Nana a birthday bash as away of endearing Kyle to Victor. Don't quite get the logic there,but OK. She hires a party planner who makes ridiculous suggestions. Slightly annoyed that Y&R are hiring someone for this role for 5 episodes when we never see doctors, co- workers etc. But OK to that to. With all the talk we are expecting something special. What we get is the Jazz Lounge hideously decorated with some ugly tablecloths and a few tacky decorations. They needed a planner for this? Then the guest list consists of family members (no grandchildren)and a few others. Hardly a party. As usual the costuming is pretty awful. A red and black theme ? And our guest of honor is sporting a do that looks like a cross between Cameron Diaz in Something about Mary and Marie from Roxette. They should have had an intimate dinner and ditched all the fanfare. Would have been way more believable.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Her accent sounds horrible and doesn't fit in line with the character or the dialogue. I was just messing around on YouTube and perusing early Tad and Dixie videos. Notably, Dixie, a resident of Pigeon Hollow, West Virginia, has no discernible accent. i have no idea why she would add a defunct accent to this character now. I want to do an honest survey here. I watch BTG every day and I love it. It's not perfect, but I find it 99% entertaining. For those that find fault with it - what is actually bothering you? I'm not going to argue at all, or disagree with you. I just want to know what others are seeing that I'm not.
    • It's a choice and today, she made it more British than ever before. It's almost like she's making Pamela act like how she thinks she should be acting.
    • I cannot believe there is a whole storyline about the Abbott house renovation. They really are grasping over at Y&R. I don’t see a big difference in the set. It is refreshed. Why make a storyline out of it? 
    • Cady is using what sounds like a transatlantic accent which is so odd these days. Sharon's hostility is entertaining already. That look she gave Anita when she opened the door was pure attitude.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy