Jump to content

AMC: Thursday, June 18


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I don't get how that's hypocritical. How is he saying one thing and doing another?

That's a lame comparison. Not to mention insulting. Something didn't just "go wrong" in David's life. His wife walked out on him and now he's learned he lost a FOURTH child. David has shown he can drink responsibly countless times before. When's the last time JR drank responsi-- wait, he's an alcoholic! So whenever he drinks he stays in the bottle for weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

David deserves what he gets.

That simple.

Amanda has every right to keep David from her childs life. yeah i get it, tis his child too, she slept with, etc.... but whatever. He is an awful evil person whos ets out to destroy peoples lives for fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I missed this episode. Reads like I ought to just skip it and move on to today's.

:wub:

No AMC, I didn't want another preachifying, Babe clone (Now! With No Baby-Stealing Baggage!). No, I didn't want another/yet the same Carey screwing up JR's life. Set him free. Give her to recently missing Scott, better yet leave town. I hold no hope, however.

I am a big David fan but he's had several bouts of drunkenness now. Some of those moments have lead to him shaking and hurting women. Even acknowledging his profound losses (and that most anyone would pull one under the same circumstances), he's taken on some serious drinking (more event-based...just an observation). I think to get so out-of-control and physically abusive to women is completely out-of-character for Dr. Delish. Considering David's behavior over a period of time now, however I believe he has become hypocrite about drinking.

I am fast redlining on plot, plot, plot, plot..... I am entertained some days but find I don't care about or bother getting attached to many of the stories because there's rarely a point to any of them. The plots aren't doing a lot of favors for the likeability of AMC's cast of characters either, imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As long as it's also requirement for Cameron to undergo hefty acting lessons -- so he can legitimately act out Ryan reacting to being called out on his crap... instead of a simple :mellow:. I mean, damn! Even Alicia Minshew gets all shifty-eyed and starts gulping and shaking like a nervous chihuahua whenever someone calls Kendall out on something.

And to sum up my view on David's hypocrisy about drinking... Wasn't Jake also a barhopping drunk when Taylor dumped him and David suspended him from work? Hitting up the Casino bar and ConFusion bar on the regular -- and didn't one of those stops on his drinking tour result in him drunkenly pelting Amanda with all kinds of sluts and whores? And isn't he just as judgmental of JR? And isn't he the one who just finished intentionally driving home the idea that it's David's fault this his baby is dead? THAT'S what I'm talking about when it comes to hypocrisy. Considering yourself a good guy while doing just as, or even more despicable things to someone else. There's a difference between "what's good for the goose is good for the gander" and "I'm judging you for your bad behavior, but I am NEVER to be judged for my own!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, Jake did do the bar hopping scene for the four weeks he was suspended from his duties at the hospital, but no, one of those stops did not result in him drunkenly pelting Amanda with all kinds of 'sluts' and 'whores". He asked her if she was playing "dress up again" this time as a hooker. No doubt he was a drunken ass but what he said to Amanda was a far cry from calling her a slut or whore...playing dress up vs. real life. Although David has called her both of those names several times.

Sounds just like David when he lambasts JR for his alcoholism and then turns around gets drunk, physically assaults his wife or gets behind the wheel of a car endangering not only himself and his passenger(s) but anyone else who dares to be on the roads of Pine Valley while David does what he regularly blasts JR for doing. If JR had done what David just did David would be the first one to call JR every name in the book and take him back to court and challenge his fitness to raise a small child... Sounds like David isn't fit to raise a child either. Of course this is just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, he referred to her as a hooker? You're right. That's not the same as calling a woman a whore. True, a whore and a hooker are both names designated for woman who offer their bodies in exchange for something...

Here's the difference -- and as snotty as this sounds, I really wish people would actually WATCH the show instead of salivating over their favorite actor/couple -- JR's exhibited a pattern of destructive behavior due to his chemical dependency/addiction ever since he was 14 years old! Way back when he was strung out on drugs and drove off with a pregnant Hayley in the car with him and crashed into the side of the road. What's going on with David is recent... within the last month. I don't understand how the past few weeks, when David's been drunk twice compares to the last five years of JR's on/off/on/off/on/off sobriety -- which resulted in toppling over a scaffold of cynder blocks and construction equipment on a pregnant Kendall, jumping out of a hotel window, enabling his son to get alcohol poisoning and then holding a loaded gun and threatening to murder his own father.

Comparing David's bouts of drunkenness to JR's alcoholic fits of rage are ridiculous. If I recall correctly (since I'm not watching this week), the last time David was drunk, he was in his own house. Mabe McGrimace and KWAK went over to him. He didn't seek them out.

As for David not being fit to raise a child -- can he at least be allowed to raise ONE of his children before people just off hand judge him as a horrible father?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • When the announcement was first made, I did wonder if other plans were in the works. I guess we can always keep hoping, especially as the show has a small core cast.
    • @chrismlAbout Lisa, agree to disagree. Actually at the time she was the only thing my partner & I disagreed about. Naturally she was Team Vicky while I was steadfast as Team Lisa.  About John & twin paternity, I think that like the 3 pillows was a transitory idea someone had that no one else agreed with. More of the attempt to accommodate Philece. About MJ, co-sign, 100% agree, if there were more degrees I would claim them. About Wally & Felicia, always a fan. Mitch? Eh, take or leave. Although I do agree that WGE is a really striking man. Who have I left out? I don't know so that's all I got.
    • RIP Wayne Lewis.

      Please register in order to view this content

      (he sings near the end of the episode) https://deadline.com/2025/06/wayne-lewis-dead-atlantic-starr-founder-singer-1236426870/
    • Dallas peaked early, IMO. Maybe not a fair statement as I’m still making my way through the first half of its run, but I think it’s hard to argue to point that S3 into S4 was its high point. Back to Knots. Wrapping up “And Never Brought to Mind.” Greg’s introduction kinda took me by surprise. I low-key dreaded his arrival bc I know he very quickly gets to the center of the show, but even though they wasted no time connecting him with Mac, Abby, Gary, and Karen, it still feels like a gradual intro. The juxtaposition of the ending of the Chip story with the heating up Abby’s plotting is quite symbolic of the changes the show was going through. I absolutely cannot imagine Kenny and Ginger having any part in any of this. Yall, the Gary/Val piano theme that they pull out from time to time is my FAVORITE. I find myself humming it constantly.
    • Bloodshed is inevitable now. It’s another reason I’m glad Black people aren’t getting involved in these protests. As awful as this is, I keep reminding myself that 54 percent of Latino men voted for Trump. These people were put in harm’s way by members of their own communities and sometimes even members of their own families. Too many people decided to touch the stove.
    • Maybe I'm still in denial, but nothing about Neighbours' ongoing social media output gives the vibe of a show that's ending. In today's 'Roundup' video, Alan Fletcher referenced that production finishes in five weeks, but in all the show's posts the cast are as jovial and lighthearted as ever. Remarkably so for people who are about to lose their jobs.    Perhaps they're just putting a brave face on things, and I know they approached the previous axing with a positive attitude. Maybe putting an upbeat face on things is a collective way of showing potential backers that there's still life in the show? Or is it possible that they already know the show has been saved, and we'll get an announcement next month when filming wraps and the show 'rests'?   Does any of that make sense?!
    • A very good week for male eye candy on GH. New Michael is beautiful, Curtis's arms looked great in that polo shirt, Cody looks even more handsome with his new haircut AND we got Marco in swim shorts rocking his lovely bod and chest fur. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Yeah when Jamey Giddens did breakdowns for DAYS, he would sometimes state in tweets that specific things were his idea that he had pitched to Ron.
    • I don't, since they've clearly incorporated them into Tomas' storyline, and I happen to like his tattoos, but his jackets not fitting doesn't mean they're trying to cover his tattoos. The clothing overall isn't the issue; it's the fit. And I expect(ed) more from Jeresa Featherstone and her team. Very disappointed. He's the only male, overall, whose costume irritates me.
    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy